Jump to content

Levis named the starter moving forward


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

New era begins.   Please declare yourself for or against in the comments, so we can figure out the new teams.

I would have joined the mob if he said anything other than this.   RIP Fanboys.  I know it’s been miserable being wrong at every turn the past 3+ years.  But @OILERMAN @BudsOilers and @oldsc

Posted Images

Just now, rns90 said:

Cmon, that means others (Ran and AAS most likely) had a say in the decision as well and they came to a consensus.

I know, I just need him to say it so I can point out fanboy hypocrisy when they:

 

1) knock Vrabel for not having better talent on the oline (aka fixing the OL) when adding personnel is the GMs job

2) ovoid giving him credit for making a plainly obvious choice at starting QB, when naming starters is part of a HC job description

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mercalius said:

This feels big and honestly unexpected.  Vrabel was pretty set on Tannehill being the starter when healthy.  
 

I was fully expecting Levis to start this week but only with the same song and dance Vrabel had given the last two weeks about things pending on RT’s health.  
 

I wonder if the charade just got old as the media pressure/criticism of that method was starting to be too much or whether he legitimately wanted to go back to Tannehill ASAP but maybe had some conversations with Ran and/or Amy.  
 

Just a surprisingly big pivot from where he’s been the last two weeks, with a healthier than ever Tannehill and Levis coming back to earth a bit on a loss.  

 

There were rumors that not all the staff was on board w/ drafting Levis. It could very easily be that Vrabel never wanted to draft a QB at all but Ran wanted one and tried to go get one. Then everyone was gone, Vrabel talked them into Skoronski. Then once Levis fell, Ran went up in the 2nd to get him. 

 

Once we got into camp, Vrabel stuck him behind Tannehill and Willis b/c he never wanted him to begin w/.. until his hand was forced.

 

All complete conjecture of course but if true, I think Vrabel is gone at the end of the year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Pragidealist said:

Is there any public announcement from Vrabel? I'm just wondering if he managed to state that without saying anything positive about Levis.  He's been impressive in his ability to dodge saying anything remotely good about the rookie (for whatever reason).  

This is where the fan base is annoying.  In his comments about Levis, Vrabel has been pretty damn accurate in what's he's said publicly.  The fan base is giddy because they wanted anyone but Tannehill but anything less than fawning over him is seen as hate.

 

You guys did the same retarded thing with Mariota.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, BudsOilers said:

This is where the fan base is annoying.  In his comments about Levis, Vrabel has been pretty damn accurate in what's he's said publicly.  The fan base is giddy because they wanted anyone but Tannehill but anything less than fawning over him is seen as hate.

 

You guys did the same retarded thing with Mariota.....

1) What I said was 100% accurate 2) Tongue was firmly in cheek.  😉

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, BudsOilers said:

This is where the fan base is annoying.  In his comments about Levis, Vrabel has been pretty damn accurate in what's he's said publicly.  The fan base is giddy because they wanted anyone but Tannehill but anything less than fawning over him is seen as hate.

 

You guys did the same retarded thing with Mariota.....

You and I finally agree on something.  Vrabel has no buisiness praising Levis for anything.  He just needs to make sure he does everything to ensure he developes....all he has shown is promise, but he could still bomb out.  Its only been 2 games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, VaTitan said:

I know, I just need him to say it so I can point out fanboy hypocrisy when they:

 

1) knock Vrabel for not having better talent on the oline (aka fixing the OL) when adding personnel is the GMs job

2) ovoid giving him credit for making a plainly obvious choice at starting QB, when naming starters is part of a HC job description

 

 

 

Meathead won't name an adequate starter at LT, and likely made the switch to Levis as starter because of pressure from Ran/AAS.

 

You're defense of meathead is hilarious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, VaTitan said:

I know, I just need him to say it so I can point out fanboy hypocrisy when they:

 

1) knock Vrabel for not having better talent on the oline (aka fixing the OL) when adding personnel is the GMs job

2) ovoid giving him credit for making a plainly obvious choice at starting QB, when naming starters is part of a HC job description

 

 

On 1: the point has been that he hasn't taken advantage of the talent there.  In Skronksi, Radunz as options as LT.  Also, you are fooling yourself if you don't think that Vrabel had a HUGE role in signing Dillard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pragidealist said:

Is there any public announcement from Vrabel? I'm just wondering if he managed to state that without saying anything positive about Levis.  He's been impressive in his ability to dodge saying anything remotely good about the rookie (for whatever reason).  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...