Vrabel and Russini

[TF_Titan]

44 minutes ago, ctm said:

Bob Kraft will be giving Vabel a high five and an atta boy.

 

100%

 

If there's a team where the HC can engage in sexual misconduct and actually improve his standing with the team it's the Patriots.

[TeamRamrod]

“Don’t do dumb shit to hurt the team”

[Tnasty]

3 hours ago, Alcibiades said:

I get your point, but there's still SOME sexism in that. The fact that she's a woman is definitely part of the problem here (for her). I get that it's hard to imagine a male reporter using sex to get info, but that's kind of my point. Plus, for reasons (sexist reasons), she will be seen as a bad person for cheating MUCH more than he will, independent of their careers. But overall, I see your point. Vrabel will be fine. She won't. And a large part of that IS their respective roles. 

Sexism exists. Men get drafted women don’t. Some shit just goes your way when your a particular sex. And these are adults who should know that. 

[Tnasty]

2 hours ago, Jamalisms said:

 

That's my guess as well. And, oh the humanity!

You would have no problem with your significant other going to a couples hotel, getting into the other persons room to go to the roof (only accessible via rooms per reporting) and dancing on the roof together?

 

No we didn’t actively see the act of sex but what else do you need to know that at the very least there’s an emotional affair going on? 
 

this isn’t friendly behavior, this is romantic behavior 

[begooode]

2 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Go show me anything resembling this situation. 

 

The Bobby Petrino scandal at Arkansas was a thousand times worse, much more brazen as a godlike HC run amok on the college town -- including hiring female student athletes to have affairs with them, until his motorcycle crash with one of his women.  Huge uproar, the AD fires him and offers the big apology, the whole nine,... only for Petrino to continue coaching and eventually cycles back to Fayetteville just over a decade later.  Fans don't care about affairs as long as a coach is not a total degenerate and can deliver Ws

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Petrino

[Titans279]

32 minutes ago, Tnasty said:

Sexism exists. Men get drafted women don’t. Some shit just goes your way when your a particular sex. And these are adults who should know that. 

Men get drafted because the men in charge are sexist against men?
 

[Jamalisms]

21 minutes ago, Tnasty said:

You would have no problem with your significant other going to a couples hotel, getting into the other persons room to go to the roof (only accessible via rooms per reporting) and dancing on the roof together?

 

No we didn’t actively see the act of sex but what else do you need to know that at the very least there’s an emotional affair going on? 
 

this isn’t friendly behavior, this is romantic behavior 

 

I was asked to explain anything that could possibly be acceptable about the photo, as if it's wildly incriminating. But it's two people dancing - and not intimately. Big fucking whoop.

 

The pictures aren't the problem. They're innocuous and only a moron would object to the pictures like people have been doing here. It's just poor positioning of an argument and not worth anyone's time.

 

The context should be the focus - as your post attempts - but people here are too dumb and instead confront me with mundane photos. And, btw, the truth of the context (group or not group and what was actually going on) is going to shake out. It's too easy to disprove if they're lying.

 

There's reason to wonder, given the location and suspicions of their relationship historically but that's it until we give it time. And probably not too much time - which is why I'm content to wait before I call a woman a whore.

[Jamalisms]

3 minutes ago, Titans279 said:

Men get drafted because the men in charge are sexist against men?
 

 

Pretty sure the idea that women can't fight and have no role outside of a kitchen is the sexism involved.

[Callidus]

1 hour ago, TeamRamrod said:

“Don’t do dumb shit to hurt the team”

As long as he wasn't giving away useful information it didn't really hirt the team. But it does raise questions into where would he draw the line. 

[oldschool]

27 minutes ago, Jamalisms said:

 

I was asked to explain anything that could possibly be acceptable about the photo, as if it's wildly incriminating. But it's two people dancing - and not intimately. Big fucking whoop.

 

The pictures aren't the problem. They're innocuous and only a moron would object to the pictures like people have been doing here. It's just poor positioning of an argument and not worth anyone's time.

 

The context should be the focus - as your post attempts - but people here are too dumb and instead confront me with mundane photos. And, btw, the truth of the context (group or not group and what was actually going on) is going to shake out. It's too easy to disprove if they're lying.

 

There's reason to wonder, given the location and suspicions of their relationship historically but that's it until we give it time. And probably not too much time - which is why I'm content to wait before I call a woman a whore.

 

What does your wife think about the pictures? and be honest... Is your main hold up that people are calling her a whore? I agree that's out of bounds here; a word that shouldn't be thrown around lightly.

[2ToneTerror]

Jamal, man…Jesus Christ.

 

 

 

 

How many affairs has your wife had?

Your level of cope is unmatched.

[headhunter]

Just now, 2ToneTerror said:

Jamal, man…Jesus Christ.

 

 

 

 

How many affairs has your wife had?

Your level of cope is unmatched.

He wouldn't know because he can't seem to see the signs 

[TeamRamrod]

3 minutes ago, Callidus said:

As long as he wasn't giving away useful information it didn't really hirt the team. But it does raise questions into where would he draw the line. 

It's a huge distraction

[Jamalisms]

15 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

What does your wife think about the pictures? and be honest... Is your main hold up that people are calling her a whore? I agree that's out of bounds here; a word that shouldn't be thrown around lightly.

 

I actually sent her the Page Six article earlier today and asked her to read it and let me know her thoughts. No prejudging - I wanted her honest take. 

 

She said they're at arm's length in one photo, they're sitting on different walls at the pool, the hug is not a lovers embrace (she said it looked mechanical but she didn't feel like that was the right word) and the photos don't show anything remotely intimate. But the location is a problem and she'd be asking tons of questions and want lots of detail to explain it away because even if the pictures don't show anything (they don't) it's still weird and a troubling location. She wouldn't be surprised if more information comes out and it looks bad in a way the photos don't.

 

I thought it was hilarious how perfectly she echoed my own take but that's no surprise because she has a brain.

 

When I told her the takes here, she laughed (at me, really) and said what she has said many times - "I don't know why you spend so much time at that place when everyone is an idiot and just likes arguing."

[Number9]

18 hours ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

 

Cooked.