socaljake Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 43 minutes ago, headhunter said: Yes. We only have added Robinson as a weapon for Cam and that's it. We will add more premium picks on offense moreso than defense Seems likely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lantern Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 50 minutes ago, FireInTheHole said: I mean, my PREFERENCE would be top edge, but it wouldn’t make me think less of Borgonzi if he took Love. That’s based on the moves they’ve made in free agency, his past moves, and the fact he could still grab good depth and starters with 2nd/3rd round picks. I am leaning towards Styles airmcnair22, and Titans_Win_Again 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Lantern said: I am leaning towards Styles He's one of my favorites but I just have a hard time envisioning him as the pick. Most of the notable FA moves have been on D. At some point, they're going to do more to help Ward Edited March 12 by socaltitan Omar, and prometheus 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lantern Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 (edited) 6 minutes ago, socaltitan said: He's one of my favorites but I just have a hard time envisioning him as the pick. Most of the notable FA moves have been on D. At some point, they're going to do more to help Ward If there is not a free agent WR worth bringing in, there's not one. If there's not a WR worth drafting at #4 there's not one. Pollard and Spears are fine. There are WR's in round 2. There are quality RB's available not named Love. It's not a #4 or bust scenario. Personally I would invest in the OL if we are going offense. Edited March 12 by Lantern Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Starkiller Posted March 12 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 12 8 minutes ago, Lantern said: Personally I would invest in the OL if we are going offense. They could legitimately draft a starting guard in round 2 or maybe even at the top of round 3. Nash, Lantern, Omar, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strunk'sDessert Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 44 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Jake, you really don't get to say anything about this after your tantrum of how we shouldn't pay top 5 money to a RB, which is exactly what we would be doing if we took Love. Sit this one out. Wait, is this THE Jake? Did I miss this? MadMax, japan, Supernope, and 1 other 2 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 That’s not Jake. Justafan, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Strunk'sDessert said: Wait, is this THE Jake? Did I miss this? No, not Jake. It's an old handle that changed his name from Jake Locker. Edited March 12 by IsntLifeFunny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 11 hours ago, airmcnair22 said: I would agree that Tate is their WR1, but doesn't mean that they'd take him at 4. It is interesting to note that we didn't even meet with Tate at the combine. Borgonzi stressed in some of the combine interviews how important each touch point with these prospects was. So for them to have not a formal meeting with Tate at the combine is something. He could be WR1 in a class they're not that high on. We don't know what they think of the group overall. Tate doesn't seem like the type of WR Daboll has typically used which is why I'm hesitant to totally buy in on him as the pick. Same with Borg and Brinker. They come from org that have typically valued YAC. airmcnair22 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 I love the ignored users setting...... Justafan, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: No, not Jake. It's an old handle that changed his name from Jake Locker. Right, I thought you were referring to the Jake from PA. begooode 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 9 minutes ago, scine09 said: Right, I thought you were referring to the Jake from PA. I thought it was Jake from State Farm CreepingDeath, and SleepingTitan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, Starkiller said: I thought it was Jake from State Farm I was waiting for someone to make that joke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 19 minutes ago, scine09 said: Right, I thought you were referring to the Jake from PA I can see how their idiocy would be mistaken for one another. MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted March 12 Report Share Posted March 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.