Starkiller

It’s not a matter of partisanship. It’s a matter of locking threads for no reason. It serves no purpose other than preventing any chance of following up on the story.

Because I created a new thread to continue the same topic

Probably because the threads were locked and we couldn’t comment...

Or... just don’t lock threads...

You can be sure that when Cohen testifies again he will be asked directly whether he was ordered by Trump to lie to Congress.

And yet you magically decided to swoop in to post now...and it has nothing to do with the timing of this statement that defends Trump... right...

Just merge the old thread into this one if the only problem is the title

You mean you were cowering in the wake of bad news and pounced on any shred of good news the instant it appeared...

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html Special counsel Robert Mueller's office disputed an explosive story from BuzzFeed News as "not accurate" Friday night, after the news outlet reported the President had directed his personal attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress, for which Cohen was later prosecuted. "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office, in a statement. Seems to leave plenty of questions. Mueller's team didn’t say Trump never told Cohen to lie. They said the report was “not accurate”. Also, how about not locking threads about disputed stories, period...

Yeah, but that was before the polling made it clear that people blame him instead of crediting him. Now he is trying anything he can to wriggle out of it (other than abandon his dumbass wall, obviously).

Is ordering your underlings to lie to Fox News a felony, too?

"I will be making a major announcement concerning the Humanitarian Crisis on our Southern Border, and the Shutdown, tomorrow afternoon at 3 P.M., live from the @WhiteHouse," Trump tweeted Friday evening. That doesn’t sound to me like he is going to cave. Either he is doubling down or he is going to try to make an offer in public and force Pelosi to make the next move try try and win back some public support.

Yes, though that may not even be necessary if you have already done it. Or it might not even have a password, it could just tell you that a marketing company got hacked and your email was on their list. For example, I put in my email address and it tells me what services were involved and roughly what date. So it says Dropbox got hacked in mid-2012. Well I already changed that password so I don’t need to do anything, but that’s only because I remember they forced everyone to change passwords.

You aren’t giving any info to them. They already have the info. You are just checking to see if your email address (or password) is in their database.