Jump to content

Titans New Stadium Discussion


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, ctm said:

There are also economists on both sides of the issue.

I tend to think it’s a waste of government money to build stadiums for billionaires and their billion dollar companies (not to mention other government deals to lure other big businesses).
 

That said, I don’t think it’s as bad as the most grim economic analysis appears, especially when it’s downtown and drives traffic to businesses downtown where sales tax revenue is generates, not to mention tourism to the city.

 

Also, it’s a systemic issue that affects most pro sports cities. It’s not special to this deal for this new stadium.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Bud on suicide watch

I'm still holding out hope Austin or San Antonio can swoop in at the last minute!

Get rekt     

Posted Images

I think people are going to be surprised how many other uses the venue is going to have other than football, that's why they're going domed so they can have complete climate control. They'll also be able to poach some sporting events from both Indy and Atlanta such as final 4 and college playoffs. Nashville is a much more desirable tourist destination than either of those cities. You can configure capacity in a domed  facility  in a lot of different ways for muscical events as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2022 at 12:28 PM, BudsOilers said:

Using tax money to build stadiums is the price for being in the NFL business.  Not one city has ever won trying to play hard ball with the NFL.  

 

Houston tried and wound up capitulating a few years later to replace the team it lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Starkiller said:

Why would the city make any money off the sale of the team though? The city doesn’t own the team. Denver didn’t get shit when the Walton kid bought the Broncos for billions.

 

The point Andrew Brand was making is the city pays for a builds the stadium, which is what makes the value of the team sky rocket, the corporate welfare NFL owner than can sell the team and makes billions in profit, while the city, who actually paid for the increase in value gets nothing. 

 

Of course that how it works but it's still fucked up 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Starkiller said:

More would be wasted by keeping the current stadium and the onerous deal for the city to fund it…

 

That's assuming they keep the stadium and uphold their end of the deal,  Since they have yet to do that, I think that's a pretty bold assumption.

 

I know you're all about government spending and will find a way to legitimize even the most egregious expenditures since you believe it to be 'government money.'  In the end, I don't give two shits because my state doesn't have to worry about those major expenditures.  We have far different things to waste taxpayer money on.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, IowaOiler said:

 

That's assuming they keep the stadium and uphold their end of the deal,  Since they have yet to do that, I think that's a pretty bold assumption.

 

I know you're all about government spending and will find a way to legitimize even the most egregious expenditures since you believe it to be 'government money.'  In the end, I don't give two shits because my state doesn't have to worry about those major expenditures.  We have far different things to waste taxpayer money on.  

I’m not “all about government spending” when it comes to benefitting billionaires or corporate interests. But with the NFL, that’s the only way Nashville got a team or will keep a team.

 

And as the city is going to fund it primarily through tourism income and by people actually using the new stadium campus, I’m not bothered by it. Locals who don’t give a shit about football and never set foot on the grounds of the stadium actually benefit from this deal. They will pay nothing extra in local taxes and the city eliminates billions in obligations loading down the general budget.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

I’m not “all about government spending” when it comes to benefitting billionaires or corporate interests. But with the NFL, that’s the only way Nashville got a team or will keep a team.

 

And as the city is going to fund it primarily through tourism income and by people actually using the new stadium campus, I’m not bothered by it. Locals who don’t give a shit about football and never set foot on the grounds of the stadium actually benefit from this deal. They will pay nothing extra in local taxes and the city eliminates billions in obligations loading down the general budget.

 

It's a lie to say you oppose it for all billionaires or corporate interests, but I won't go into it.  

 

"Primarily" through tourism isn't entirely, and local non-football fans aren't going to benefit at all.  Their tax burden isn't going down, and the stadium and increased events will only make things more congested and higher priced.  

 

As I said though, I don't really care.  How TN and Nashville governments want to waste their taxpayer dollars is their own decision.  I am an Oilers fan and will always be an Oilers fan, regardless of what city wants to claim them as their own.   I fully support other states' taxpayers footing the bill for these projects....(see how easy it is to be flippant when it isn't your money being wasted?).

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, IowaOiler said:


like I said...boring bitter little bitches

 

No doubt that book is easy to tear apart based on the factors they use being macro tax-based and likely having zero to do with entertainment.... and of course not Nashville specific. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said:

Some of y’all act like only sports teams get govt financial benefits. Y’all think Oracle is opening a HQ here just for shits and giggles without benefits from the govt?!

Seems like I remember Iowa farmers, both private and corporate, receiving crop subsidies from the feds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...