9 Nines Posted June 19 Report Share Posted June 19 Coincidence, I think not: Rumors that Victus Haze was launched and successfully hit an orbital plane. https://rocketlabcorp.com/missions/launches/victus-haze/ https://x.com/Dillonshrop06/status/2068077532457361460 kyle021 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted June 19 Author Report Share Posted June 19 CreepingDeath, TeamRamrod, Number9, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted June 19 Report Share Posted June 19 2 hours ago, OILERMAN said: 3 years is short enough for him to get another monster deal Apparently it was tacked on and PK said it's through the 2030 season. So that's like 5 years out. OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 2 hours ago, rns90 said: Well deserved. and I’m laughing just remembering all those trade proposals etc from a few years ago that wanted to get rid of Simmons. Yea, the trade Simmons crew needs to speak up. OILERMAN, and titanruss 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 1 hour ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: He looks 100% ready for his cameo on an episode of Dutton Ranch. freakingeek, Number9, Sirjesse, and 1 other 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 9 minutes ago, ctm said: Yea, the trade Simmons crew needs to speak up. Some get locked into fantasy football mode and can't get out of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TF_Titan Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 This deal is really going to tank his trade value. CreepingDeath, Supernope, IsntLifeFunny, and 2 others 3 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 3 minutes ago, TF_Titan said: This deal is really going to tank his trade value. And they seriously overpaid for a guy who only had 1 TD all year… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rap7yCw0SFg Number9, CreepingDeath, and Supernope 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 18 minutes ago, TF_Titan said: This deal is really going to tank his trade value. Idk, browns gave garrett a new deal then traded him and he got... a new deal? Supernope 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NashvilleNinja Posted June 20 Popular Post Report Share Posted June 20 CreepingDeath, Callidus, Btowner, and 2 others 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 (edited) With edge rushers getting $50M per year, this seems like a great deal. Edited June 20 by TerryBoats Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 Skoronski is next Callidus, and KogaShuko 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 Why won't AAS spend? Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 1 hour ago, oldschool said: Why won't AAS spend? Lol Its amazing that narrative won't die. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 12 hours ago, ctm said: Yea, the trade Simmons crew needs to speak up. Trading Simmons was a bad idea because you always retain great/elite players. No one player outside of a top tier QB is going to move the needle in wins and losses, it's a cumulative effect of talented players because it's the ultimate team sport. Trading away a great player just means you have another hole on the roster and a crap shoot of a chance to replace him with a draft pick. But it is annoying that many of the same people chuckling at the idea of trading Simmons are the same people who thought we should have traded away Henry or should've let him walk, and thought it was okay to replace him with a clearly inferior Tony Pollard, a player who's going to touch the ball about 300 times in a season, more than any other offensive player besides the QB, and to think that a clear downgrade was completely acceptable and even applauded. Seeing arguments made that improvements in one player vs their replacement is marginal. And therefore inconsequential. Well, guess what? You always pay a lot more for a little better, That's actually the case with everything in life you purchase. But in football it's because that little edge makes a huge difference in a season. That's why the guy with 11 sacks gets paid three times the amount as the guy with 8 sacks. Just like a guy with 16 TDs is going to get paid more than the guy with 5. And it's even worse bc even the best paid RB makes less than the highest paid OG - it was never crazy money. It's just funny to me. Number9, and CreepingDeath 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.