Hyperion Posted Monday at 08:49 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 08:49 PM The reality is nearly everyone would love to trade down and accumulate more picks. The problem is that it requires a team to be willing to trade up and there are never enough teams willing to trade up to match those who want to trade down. I'm sure Arizona and maybe the Titans want to trade down but the more important question is who wants to trade up to 3 or 4? airmcnair22, and prometheus 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted Monday at 08:52 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 08:52 PM 1 minute ago, Hyperion said: The reality is nearly everyone would love to trade down and accumulate more picks. The problem is that it requires a team to be willing to trade up and there are never enough teams willing to trade up to match those who want to trade down. I'm sure Arizona and maybe the Titans want to trade down but the more important question is who wants to trade up to 3 or 4? Damn I never thought of it thsi way before! oldschool, Pragidealist, japan, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion Posted Monday at 09:06 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:06 PM 3 minutes ago, Legaltitan said: Damn I never thought of it thsi way before! We've had plenty of experience in the top ten of the draft, nine times since they've been in Nashville. The only time they moved down was the year after Mariota when they had the luxury of the first overall pick. In all those years plenty of fans were saying trade back as if that's easy to do. Hell even last year people were wanting to trade back instead of taking a potential franchise quarterback. It's a foolish thing to expect when you're passing up on quite possibly the top player on your board. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted Monday at 09:07 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:07 PM FWIW Josh Norris from Underdog just said some late buzz he’s heard recently that the titans might go OL at 4 and specifically Cici Mauigoa was the name he heard headhunter, AussieTitanFan08, Supernope, and 1 other 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter Posted Monday at 09:08 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:08 PM 1 minute ago, TeamRamrod said: FWIW Josh Norris from Underdog just said some late buzz he’s heard recently that the titans might go OL at 4 and specifically Cici Mauigoa was the name he heard Latham sucks bro Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted Monday at 09:10 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:10 PM 1 minute ago, TeamRamrod said: FWIW Josh Norris from Underdog just said some late buzz he’s heard recently that the titans might go OL at 4 and specifically Cici Mauigoa was the name he heard It would not surprise me but it would hurt. It confirms we wasted a pick on Latham. I don't know of a team who has had to invested 3 top 10 picks in their offensive line to get it decent. TampaTitan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted Monday at 09:13 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:13 PM 2 minutes ago, Pragidealist said: It would not surprise me but it would hurt. It confirms we wasted a pick on Latham. I don't know of a team who has had to invested 3 top 10 picks in their offensive line to get it decent. And not a single pick was for a LT, a position which is still weak. Absurd. Cookie, TampaTitan, and Pragidealist 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion Posted Monday at 09:14 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:14 PM It's more of a need than most of us want to acknowledge. The Wilson and Latham picks have eternally kicked our ass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnsideKick Posted Monday at 09:20 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:20 PM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Monday at 09:21 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:21 PM 7 minutes ago, Pragidealist said: It would not surprise me but it would hurt. It confirms we wasted a pick on Latham. I don't know of a team who has had to invested 3 top 10 picks in their offensive line to get it decent. Nitpick but Skronski wasn’t top 10. He was 11 or 12th. I’m guessing they are looking at Mauigoa as a G. Otherwise taking two RT in the top 7 is uh retarded. Yes, I know Latham was taken as a LT but there was always a distinct possibility that he’d have to move to RT. Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted Monday at 09:21 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:21 PM 12 minutes ago, headhunter said: Latham sucks bro Too early to say Omar 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted Monday at 09:22 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:22 PM Just now, rns90 said: Nitpick but Skronski wasn’t top 10. He was 11 or 12th. I’m guessing they are looking at Mauigoa as a G. Otherwise taking two RT in the top 7 is uh retarded. Yes, I know Latham was taken as a LT but there was always a distinct possibility that he’d have to move to RT. Fair but still bad. Looking at a guard at 4 seems crazy.. maybe a trade down option? rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion Posted Monday at 09:26 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:26 PM 3 minutes ago, Pragidealist said: Fair but still bad. Looking at a guard at 4 seems crazy.. maybe a trade down option? Could be smoke to try to keep Arizona at 3 to draft an OL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted Monday at 09:26 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:26 PM (edited) It also could be absolutely nothing. It’s just worth noting what guys say so we know for the future Edited Monday at 09:27 PM by TeamRamrod Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted Monday at 09:28 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:28 PM 13 minutes ago, TerryBoats said: And not a single pick was for a LT, a position which is still weak. Absurd. Latham will be a good RT. He has slow feet to an extent, but he showed out for a 6 week stretch at LT. The flipping positions set him back. Plainly said, there's 0.0 chance we are giving up on him. And I hated the pick. They aren't taking OL at 4. No shot. titanruss 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.