Jump to content

Amy Adams Strunk likely behind stripping Brian Callahan of his play-calling(Terry McCormick)


OILERMAN

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 712
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

rumor is Amy was the one demanding all the wr screens

Why hire Brinker and give him total control over football decisions if you're going to meddle and make decisions like this.    She's just like her dad if this story is true and there is litt

It's 1 of 32. It is going to attract a quality candidate. The bears fired Matt Eberflus midseason and hired Ben Johnson.    This whole notion of "no one is going to want the job" is bullshit

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, ctm said:

Not really a mystery to me.  Just look who sat in on the interviews when the hiring decisions were made.

 

As for firings, same thing. Who were the immediate supervisors of the person fired?  That's who she will seek opinions from.

 

If there are differing opinions, then AAS decides, the announcement is made and everyone publically says they are on board regardless of whether they dissented in private.

 

It bothers me that we have to keep explaining this. SOP

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldschool said:

 

look at the last 3 drafts under Jrob and the two successive ones under Carthon. Beyond horrible, its no wonder the roster is devoid of talent

 

 

image.png.9c94af823da0f6bb3235b2360036dee6.png

 

By my count we have...

 

This is play level not pick value

 

Great:  Skronski

Good:  McCreary 

Ok: Gray, spears, chig. With gray trending up and spears with the injury bug

 

Ill put Latham and sweat in their own started ok but going downhill category. 

 

Harrell and williams are ok roleplayers/depth for 7th rounders. 

 

Worthless/gone: 25 players

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

It bothers me that we have to keep explaining this. SOP

Since you seem to have a handle on this. Let's say Amy decides to fire both Brinker and Borgo at the end of the season. Who specifically helps her find and hire their replacements?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

Since you seem to have a handle on this. Let's say Amy decides to fire both Brinker and Borgo at the end of the season. Who specifically helps her find and hire their replacements?

 

she'll hire a search committee or consultant, usually a former GM, just like the Skins did this past offseason. Very common practice as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said:

Man if they fire Borgonzi, I am out lol 

 

If she fires Brinker or Borgonzi in the next 2 years, everything fans and media claim about here will be true. That being said I don't get why firing Callahan when she did is looked at as some impatient reactionary decision. he 4-19 and the team was cratering more and more each week. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

she'll hire a search committee or consultant, usually a former GM, just like the Skins did this past offseason. Very common practice as well.

Are there different agencies that provide these services or do most team use the same one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

If she fires Brinker or Borgonzi in the next 2 years, everything fans and media claim about here will be true. That being said I don't get why firing Callahan when she did is looked at as some impatient reactionary decision. he 4-19 and the team was cratering more and more each week. 

I agree. I was just responding to someone suggesting it as a possibility 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

If she fires Brinker or Borgonzi in the next 2 years, everything fans and media claim about here will be true. That being said I don't get why firing Callahan when she did is looked at as some impatient reactionary decision. he 4-19 and the team was cratering more and more each week. 

People credit Amy for quickly moving on from Robinson and Vrabel when other owners may have waited around and allowed the situation to deteriorate.  Which makes sense.  But Callahan's situation was clearly one where this type of proactivity was needed.  Retaining the NFL's worst coach and making his job even more difficult but tasking him with developing the #1 overall pick was clearly a disaster waiting to happen.

Edited by TerryBoats
Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

If she fires Brinker or Borgonzi in the next 2 years, everything fans and media claim about here will be true. That being said I don't get why firing Callahan when she did is looked at as some impatient reactionary decision. he 4-19 and the team was cratering more and more each week. 

 

I wonder if she would have fired him if we hadn't had the fluke comeback against Arizona. It's like "wow, are we finally turning the corner?" to "nope, I drug my family in to see the same shit I saw two weeks ago in Houston and I've got Commander Control coming in next week. I'm done."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...