Jump to content

Titans secure picks #1 and #35 in the 2025 Draft


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

 

This is absolutely ridiculous. The floor? What's the ceiling? 

There's no way to project that. And listen, I'm not predicting this. I'm just saying that if Callahan wanted to turn him into a rhythm passer, the dude has the accuracy and processing to be that guy. He got wheels too. His awareness is not shit like Levis. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

And fuck ESPN and the NFLN you pricks can't go to a commercial before the #1 pick.

Let us old-school football guys take a moment appreciate to the fact that the Titans earned the #1 overall pick the old-fashioned way.   Not by tanking or by trading up, but by simply being

I'd hate Hunter. The Titans best position is likely CB and you don't take a WR that high. If the Titans traded down to 3 and Carter went 2 I'd rather trade down again and maybe go for someone like Mem

Posted Images

18 hours ago, AvgJoe said:

It is very hard to label a floor, but if he hits, Cam is going to be Mahomes-esque. 
 

He elevates talent around him. I’ve said it before, the best WR he will ever have played with if we draft him is Ridley. 

I keep coming back to this too.  Look back at the pff comments on Mahomes coming out and it could damn well be word for word used to describe Ward.  Not saying Ward will ever be Mahomes, but I think Borgonzi will see enough he likes to pull the trigger

 

29. Patrick Mahomes II, QB, Texas Tech

Mahomes has an incredible feel for making plays outside of the flow of the offense, and when combined with his special arm talent, that allows him to make any throw from any platform—a best-case scenario for Mahomes is tantalizing. The problem is the same feel for making plays also leads to a number of poor decisions with the football, and a prospective team has to find the balance of keeping Mahomes’ aggressiveness and natural playmaking ability while harnessing him to make good decisions within the flow of the offense. — Steve Palazzolo, @PFF_Steve

Edited by cshumak2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, cshumak2 said:

I keep coming back to this too.  Look back at the pff comments on Mahomes coming out and it could damn well be word for word used to describe Ward.  Not saying Ward will ever be Mahomes, but I think Borgonzi will see enough he likes to pull the trigger

 

29. Patrick Mahomes II, QB, Texas Tech

Mahomes has an incredible feel for making plays outside of the flow of the offense, and when combined with his special arm talent, that allows him to make any throw from any platform—a best-case scenario for Mahomes is tantalizing. The problem is the same feel for making plays also leads to a number of poor decisions with the football, and a prospective team has to find the balance of keeping Mahomes’ aggressiveness and natural playmaking ability while harnessing him to make good decisions within the flow of the offense. — Steve Palazzolo, @PFF_Steve

 

Draft Ward now, draft Ward now, draft Ward now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TeamRamrod said:

I’m of the opinion they have to get a 1 in 2026 to move down. Even if they have to fall all the way back to 6 or 7. If you’re passing on a QB this year, you need at least some kind of ammo to move up next year. 

Agreed. And as much as I like Carter, I don't think his value is greater than the #3 overall pick + 2026 NYG 1st rounder (good chance that's a top 5 pick)+ extra picks. He's not a QB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TeamRamrod said:

I’m of the opinion they have to get a 1 in 2026 to move down. Even if they have to fall all the way back to 6 or 7. If you’re passing on a QB this year, you need at least some kind of ammo to move up next year. 

 

Justin Graber had a breakdown of previous trades this century. Aside from the ridiculous SF trade for Trey Lance it's very hard to move down and get a future #1. Moving down will net you extra 2s and 3s

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

Justin Graber had a breakdown of previous trades this century. Aside from the ridiculous SF trade for Trey Lance it's very hard to move down and get a future #1. Moving down will net you extra 2s and 3s

He’s just wrong.

 

Lance

Bryce Young

Marcus Davenport

Justin Fields

Jaylen Waddle

Mahomes.

Goff obviously.

Wentz.

Sammy Watkins.

Julio Jones.

Deshaun Watson.

 

Those are just off the top of my head.

Edited by TeamRamrod
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

I could be framing it incorrectly. Basically for the Titans to get a future 1 they have to trade way down based on recent trades

You’re actually right.  I took a look at the trades that @TeamRamrod mentioned .  Most of them aren’t  trades down for a few spots.  The Waddle one MIA went from 12 to 6 is pretty close.    Watkins is the other one as the Bills went from 9 to 4. But they are pretty much outliers .
 

You’d have to go down to Raiders (rumored to sign Darnold), Jets (no 3rd rounder and Whatever gave up for Reddick) or Saints at #9.

 

 

The rest of those involved moving down(or up 10 spots).  Young trade involved 7 spots and that’s probably the most similar circumstance.

 

But yeah , might want to pump the breaks on the trade return.

 

There have been trades that you move down slightly that required giving up a future first round (Leaf 1998, RG3 2012) but those seem like outliers.

 

The Sam Darnold trade up (6 to 3)  in 2018 might be closer to what one can expect.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said:

He’s just wrong.

 

Lance

Bryce Young

Marcus Davenport

Justin Fields

Jaylen Waddle

Mahomes.

Goff obviously.

Wentz.

Sammy Watkins.

Julio Jones.

Deshaun Watson.

 

Those are just off the top of my head.

 That Sammy Watkins trade stands out as being particularly awful. 

 

Marcus Davenport didn't really pan out either, but I understand the logic better. Brees was nearing the end and the Saints had gotten so close to getting back to the SB. Repeated heartbreaking postseason losses and they thought Davenport would be the pass rusher to get them over the hump. Just didn't happen.

Edited by socaltitan
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rns90 said:

 @TeamRamrod mentioned .  Most of them aren’t  trades down for a few spots.  
 

You’d have to go down to Raiders (rumored to sign Darnold), Jets (no 3rd rounder and Whatever gave up for Reddick) or Saints at #9.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah. That’s exactly why I said what I originally said

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the Titans trade or keep the No. 1 pick?

Trade the pick: Five votes
Keep the pick: Three votes

The overall feeling is the Titans will trade the top pick of the draft. The execs, coaches and scouts who voted that way believe the Titans lack true game-altering players and say none of the quarterbacks in this draft class can elevate the current supporting cast. So moving back with a QB-needy team for more picks could be the way to go for Tennessee.

"The Titans' roster has a lot of holes," one AFC personnel executive said. "They need more than just a quarterback. I mean, who would Shedeur [Sanders] or Cam [Ward] throw to if they take them? They need help!"

 

An NFC scout weighed in with a similar thought: "They can't put these rookies behind that offensive line and expect them to succeed. The Titans' protection was so bad their quarterbacks had no chance. They have to build the roster up before they add a quarterback."

 

The Titans were 31st in QBR this past season (37.3), but to the evaluators' point, the rest of the team struggled around Will Levis and Mason Rudolph. Tennessee was 27th in pass block win rate (56.1%), 21st in run defense (4.5 yards allowed per carry), 25th in defensive pressure rate (29.0%) and tied for 30th in turnover margin (minus-16) en route to a 3-14 record.

 

The Titans have made it known they're willing to entertain offers for the first pick. President of football operations Chad Brinker said he wants to acquire picks, especially in the top 100. Trading out of No. 1 is the best way to add more draft capital.

 

"They want more picks, so I think they'd come off that first pick," an AFC scout said. "But it takes two to tango. Someone has to fall in love with one of these quarterbacks enough to give up a ransom to get to the top. I'd say it would take a pick swap no later than No. 7 overall and a [second-rounder] this year to go with a first-round and at least third-round pick next year."

 

Not everyone feels that the Titans will trade the pick, though. "You don't want to find yourself making the first pick often," an AFC assistant coach said. "You have to make it count and get your quarterback. I think that's what the Titans will do. Keep the top pick and draft Cam Ward." -- Davenport

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2025/story/_/id/43809756/2025-nfl-draft-top-pick-prospects-quarterbacks-titans-trade-ward-sanders-carter-hunter

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said:

Yeah. That’s exactly why I said what I originally said

So do you move down if you don’t get a future #1 but the draft picks you get kind of add up to like a first rounder in total?

 

This is assuming that they don’t love any of the qbs enough to take them at #1.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...