Jump to content

Thought on 1st round(Tate and Faulk


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I actually think the Titans likely take Tate even if Love was on the board. Analytically taking a WR helps Ward way more than a RB. Plus the value in terms of roster construction. Love is the going to

Big dick playas! Swinging past ya knees!

I dont know if the plan was to go Tate all along but I do think that the Cards picking Love made it an easy choice that protected our FO from itself re: Love. I do believe we tried to trade back and i

Posted Images

28 minutes ago, Legaltitan said:

I like this regime because for the first time in a long time we target players and we go get them. We don't fuck around, wait for runs to start and then get a guy, make panic pics, unnecessary trades, etc. The guys set their board, feel confident, and go out and make it happen. That should be the expectation, but we suffered many years here where that didn't happen. These guys will either work or they won't, but you can be damn sure that the guys we drafted were drafted because they loved them and fit perfectly within their plans. Last year's draft felt the same. We doubted Dike and others and it has played out pretty well IMO

Exactly. I'm at the point now of Trust in Don B that when he makes a pick or brings in a FA, if I'm opposed, I need to figure out why I'm wrong. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Legaltitan said:

I like this regime because for the first time in a long time we target players and we go get them. We don't fuck around, wait for runs to start and then get a guy, make panic pics, unnecessary trades, etc. The guys set their board, feel confident, and go out and make it happen. That should be the expectation, but we suffered many years here where that didn't happen. These guys will either work or they won't, but you can be damn sure that the guys we drafted were drafted because they loved them and fit perfectly within their plans. Last year's draft felt the same. We doubted Dike and others and it has played out pretty well IMO

 

I always felt JRob targeting guys and trading up / trading away picks rather often was a flaw in his process. Generally, draft is such a crapshoot that I think opportunity matters more than specifics and trading up raises the stakes of hitting on your (artificially low number of) picks. 

 

I like that they kept pick count with this trade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jamalisms said:

 

I always felt JRob targeting guys and trading up / trading away picks rather often was a flaw in his process. Generally, draft is such a crapshoot that I think opportunity matters more than specifics and trading up raises the stakes of hitting on your (artificially low number of) picks. 

 

I like that they kept pick count with this trade.

There's a balance for sure. Being aggressive for the sake of being aggressive is also dumb. These guys just feel like they have utmost confidence in their board and a pretty good feel for the flow of the draft. Just feels different. Now if it all goes to shit I reserve the right to change my mind lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Jamalisms said:

 

I always felt JRob targeting guys and trading up / trading away picks rather often was a flaw in his process. Generally, draft is such a crapshoot that I think opportunity matters more than specifics and trading up raises the stakes of hitting on your (artificially low number of) picks. 

 

I like that they kept pick count with this trade.

 

Hopefully they up the pick count with a trade or two tonight or tomorrow. I hate that they could miss out on a pool of over 70 players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Athletic gave the Tate pick a B+. Then moving up for a versatile edge in Faulk was aggressively going after guys that fit the scheme and could have easily been off the board by the time we picked in the 2nd round. They have a clear vision of what they want this team to look like. I really thought they would trade back but I’m happy with both players, particularly the way the draft was falling. Tate’s ability to work the sidelines  and come back to the quarterback fits Cams style perfectly and will pay dividends right off the bat. The dude in NFL ready which is what we need right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overall I am happy with these picks.  I would have preferred to have taken Reese at #4 and then a WR in the late first via trade up or with our early second.  This was my preference because I believe Reese is a better prospect than Tate and I think the second tier WR talent is better than the second tier defensive guys like Faulk.  But what we did is my second choice and it's good drafting IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the value of Faulk is pretty dam good.  While I do not like him, it is because TN has never had a Saleh D and it is very clear to me Saleh wants a Faulk like DE.  So I am not going to talk smack about the guy since our scheme has changed.  Now Tate was overdrafted by slot for need.  This guy gives me Plexico Burress vibes.  I think he'll be fine but nothing special.  DL and WR room done.  We need depth now at OL, DB and LB.  I think LB is the biggest need now not OL.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bongo59 said:

We need depth now at OL, DB and LB.  I think LB is the biggest need now not OL.  

 

So... which is it? Do we need depth at linebacker or a starter?

 

And an animated scarecrow as our starting RG works for you?

 

 

Shaun The Sheep Movie Ok GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...