Pragidealist Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 5 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Which is fair. I also agree with 9s that if you have a WR rated as a top player it makes it ridiculously unlikely you would take a RB even if his tape was better. We still don't know, and it doesn't really matter either way in my opinion, but I'm okay with the logic of saying if they see Tate as a top 10 WR then yeah he was likely the choice regardless of Love. Would have been really fucking interesting if the Cardinals had of traded the pick for Reese though lol. I mean ppl are always going to believe what they want. In the end, I liked Tate and am happy with the pick. IsntLifeFunny, and Justafan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, Pragidealist said: I mean ppl are always going to believe what they want. In the end, I liked Tate and am happy with the pick. Seriously happy with the pick. I thought for sure we were taking Styles when the pick came in. headhunter, Pragidealist, and Justafan 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 Just now, IsntLifeFunny said: Seriously happy with the pick. I thought for sure we were taking Styles when the pick came in. I was pretty confident on that one being bullshit. begooode, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 8 minutes ago, rns90 said: I was pretty confident on that one being bullshit. Logically yes. Yet ... sometimes logic does not apply. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 5 minutes ago, Pragidealist said: Logically yes. Yet ... sometimes logic does not apply. It was always the same thing when you read about that . He’s a fit for the Robert Saleh defense something something Fred Warner. it was obvious someone spread that misinformation around. . Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post oldschool Posted April 24 Popular Post Report Share Posted April 24 18 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Seriously happy with the pick. I thought for sure we were taking Styles when the pick came in. I assumed it was Reese but was extremely worried it was going to be Styles. I should have known Borgonzi wouldn't be that dumb. Justafan, rns90, IsntLifeFunny, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 3 minutes ago, oldschool said: I assumed it was Reese but was extremely worried it was going to be Styles. I should have known Borgonzi wouldn't be that dumb. Draft media was especially awful this year . i think they had Love rated highly but he was never going to be the pick if another positional value need player was available. this place went nuts over the possible Love selection, even though some of us pointed how unlikely it was. titanruss, and oldschool 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 (edited) 3 minutes ago, rns90 said: Draft media was especially awful this year . i think they had Love rated highly but he was never going to be the pick if another positional value need player was available. this place went nuts over the possible Love selection, even though some of us pointed how unlikely it was. I think that's confirmation bias. Love went at 3. I think he was going to go at 4. Shefter said right before the draft if Cards don't take him, he likely goes at 4. Giants also liked him at 5. I had them Love, Tate, Bailey, Reese and I think that's what it was. Ppl went nuts I was saying we'd pass on both edges and now that we passed on 1- ppl just shrug. I think we passed on both. You could say its confirmation bias for me too on Bailey but they got a bigger DE- just like I was saying instead of a speedster tweener. But none of that really matters. It's been a fun discussion all the way around and most of us are quite happy we got Tate. The Styles smoke made getting Tate even sweeter. Edited April 24 by Pragidealist oldschool 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, Pragidealist said: I think that's confirmation bias. Love went at 3. I think he was going to go at 4. Shefter said right before the draft if Cards don't take him, he likely goes at 4. Giants also liked him at 5. I had them Love, Tate, Bailey, Reese and I think that's what it was. You could say its confirmation bias for me too on Bailey but they got a bigger DE- just like I was saying instead of a speedster tweener. But none of that really matters. It's been a fun discussion all the way around and most of us are quite happy we got Tate. The Styles smoke made getting Tate even sweeter. The Reddit guy who has some sort of connection to the team , says Bailey was #1 on our board. Legaltitan, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 5 minutes ago, rns90 said: Draft media was especially awful this year . i think they had Love rated highly but he was never going to be the pick if another positional value need player was available. this place went nuts over the possible Love selection, even though some of us pointed how unlikely it was. Anymore unlikely than say the Cardinals taking him at 3 without a QB and RT? He is the best player in the draft. It isn't a stretch. Borgonzi didn't say "Tate was our top rated player". He said"he was one of our top rated players". There's no win on either side of the argument. We will never know the answer to that question. Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, rns90 said: The Reddit guy who has some sort of connection to the team , says Bailey was #1 on our board. I need a shrug emoji. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 Just now, rns90 said: The Reddit guy who has some sort of connection to the team , says Bailey was #1 on our board. Bailey was the #1 EDGE by a lot. Prag just has no clue whats hes talking about. rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TerryBoats Posted April 25 Popular Post Report Share Posted April 25 If you had told me that we would have Carnell Tate, Keldrick Faulk, and Anthony Hill Jr. - and it only cost one 4th round pick - I don't think I would have believed it. They have nailed it thus far. Justafan, Omar, Starkiller, and 3 others 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted April 25 Report Share Posted April 25 titanskick8851 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted April 25 Report Share Posted April 25 1 hour ago, TerryBoats said: If you had told me that we would have Carnell Tate, Keldrick Faulk, and Anthony Hill Jr. - and it only cost one 4th round pick - I don't think I would have believed it. They have nailed it thus far. There is going to be very mixed reactions to this Titans draft both within the local media and the national draft media as well. Some love getting help for Ward others think its a crime against football that Borgonzi took Tate over Reese or Styles. Some see the potential upside in Faulk others can't get onboard trading up into the first round for an EDGE that doesn't have great pass rushing production. The Hill Jr pick is the one generally liked by most as they can see what Saleh can do with an athletic LB like him. Justafan, and begooode 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.