Jump to content

Vrabel and Russini


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jamalisms said:

It's always amazing how any legitimate angle gets ignored and the dumbest fucking arguments get made and then doubled down on.

What legitimate angle?  Serious question. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 964
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What we all predicted lol

What a coward, doesn’t she know Jamal knows she’s innocent?

Her playing the victim and blaming the media is pitiful. She did this all herself   It sounds like the investigation uncovered more proof about them being guilty, which led to her resigning.

Posted Images

13 minutes ago, TheBukafax said:

Idk if you’re quoting the wrong person or?

 

I never mentioned court. I said there are people who also believe Trump didn’t fuck kids because they haven’t seen direct proof.

 

Person A: There's always someone on the jury who won't convict. 

 

Person B: Except when Trump is in court. 

 

Person C : Something something outside of court.

 

Person B: Take this to court and you'd fail. You guys are dumb. 

 

Person A: They'd totally get a criminal conviction here. 

 

Person B: Nuh-uh.

 

Person C : Why are you talking about court? 

 

--

 

I ignored the change of subject and lumped you in. Maybe I shouldn't have lumped you in. Don't really care. I'm distracting myself from doing my last minute taxes and spending too much time here because it amused me but I'm not engaging in every dumb conversational thread thrown my way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, scine09 said:

What legitimate angle?  Serious question. 

 

What's the actual difference of opinion / approach?

 

Warning: You may have to try actual reading and comprehending posts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jamalisms said:

 

Person A: There's always someone on the jury who won't convict. 

 

Person B: Except when Trump is in court. 

 

Person C : Something something outside of court.

 

Person B: Take this to court and you'd fail. You guys are dumb. 

 

Person A: They'd totally get a criminal conviction here. 

 

Person B: Nuh-uh.

 

Person C : Why are you talking about court? 

 

--

 

I ignored the change of subject and lumped you in. Maybe I shouldn't have lumped you in. Don't really care. I'm distracting myself from doing my last minute taxes and spending too much time here because it amused me but I'm not engaging in every dumb conversational thread thrown my way.

 

please. you know damn well what Oman meant. Just take the L...

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

please.

 

Beg all you want, moron.

 

Anyone who can read knows what was meant by "crime, went to court, found guilty".

 

It's simple, plain English.

 

2 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

If infidelity was a crime and this case went to court they would both undoubtedly be found guilty pretty easily

 

I repeat: 

 

1 hour ago, Jamalisms said:

It's always amazing how any legitimate angle gets ignored and the dumbest fucking arguments get made and then doubled down on.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jamalisms said:

 

Beg all you want, moron.

 

Anyone who can read knows what was meant by "crime, went to court, found guilty".

 

It's simple, plain English.

 

 

I repeat: 

 

 

 

Its always funny when you show you aren't the smartest person in the room despite the fact you think you are. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Little Earl said:


Give it up with the Trump bitching.  As you recall Bill Clinton cheated on his wife in the Oval Office, and the left did not care.


In Little Earls World. Getting a blowjob from a girl in her 20's is the same as raping children.... and trying to get a president fired for a blowjob is the same as trying to get one fired for attempting a coup to overthrow the government. 
 

Wild how dumb the right is morally and politically. 

Edited by titanruss
Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Its always funny when you show you aren't the smartest person in the room despite the fact you think you are. 

 

Ryder Cup Lol GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jamalisms said:

 

Forget explicit penetration. Which of those photos is getting you a criminal conviction for the made up crime of "infidelity"?

 

Why are limiting this to only a photo for a conviction? 

 

There is way more to this criminal case than "a photo". 

 

These two drove two hours to a romantic couples only adult resort. They were photos of them(only them) dancing, embracing, in the pool, in the hot tub, on the roof, which you can only get on through the private rooms, this all took place through the day, overnight and into the next morning....

 

What's the counter argument to infidelity? Who participates in all of these activities at this resort who isn't engaging in infidelity? 

 

You present your laughable case as if the jury is only going to see a photo. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...