Bongo59 Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 (edited) As soon as Pickens gets paid he will become a head case like Antonio Brown on steroids. He will make Rasheed Rice look like an alter boy. Edited January 11 by Bongo59 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTiger3733 Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 I'm hoping for a restructure with Ridley Bongo59, and Omar 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 20 hours ago, BTiger3733 said: Point #2 is why George Pickens is not a realistic option for us in FA, opposed to many posters' predictions here. I guess because he's a headcase? titanruss, Starkiller, and OILERMAN 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 13 minutes ago, japan said: I guess because he's a headcase? The dude started melting down on the Cowboys closing in on a potential monster deal japan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 21 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: The dude started melting down on the Cowboys closing in on a potential monster deal I wonder how much coke is flowing through his veins on any given day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaltitan Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 Top two priorities need to be: 1. Upgrade CB 2. Upgrade weapons around Cam Cam taking a big leap from year 1 to year 2 is critical. We have plenty of cap space. Go after one of the top FA WR options or trade for a WR. I'd even look at TE like Pitts or Otton. No reason to cheap out. Look how the Bears helped Caleb from year 1 to year 2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted January 13 Author Report Share Posted January 13 15 minutes ago, socaltitan said: Top two priorities need to be: 1. Upgrade CB 2. Upgrade weapons around Cam Cam taking a big leap from year 1 to year 2 is critical. We have plenty of cap space. Go after one of the top FA WR options or trade for a WR. I'd even look at TE like Pitts or Otton. No reason to cheap out. Look how the Bears helped Caleb from year 1 to year 2. The Bears have got 5 top 45 picks in their offensive skill position ranks (3WR and 2TE). The Titans currently have 1 under contract in Ridley and his future is clouded due to his injury and contract. If McDaniel ends up winning the HC gig you would have to imagine Borgonzi will need to pump a heap of speed and YAC potential into this roster this offseason. Starkiller 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyle021 Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 If they hire McDaniel i assume they'll target Waddle in a trade in the offseason Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 Iirc, Borgonzi has said he wants to upgrade the DL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 After watching Houston Rams and Seattle everyone better want another stud on the DL. Our pass rush was was bettr than everyone thought and that happened with Femi being out most of the yr. I thought this part of the D was pretty solid. the back end was bad because Borgo just decided to empty the cubbard. Winston's rookie yr was also a wash but it is clear he can play. I think our 6th round CB is going to be a nice piece to at the slot. I think FA may be best at upgrding weapons but I would absolutely try to convince Ridley to redo his deal and keep him. If we do that we likely can get another WR and TE in free agency. Cam deserves to have some vets around him and not wait on the rookies to develop. The defense needs a lot of young bloood so I am hoping the draft is really used to rebuild the D. This draft is solid for DE LB and DBs. It is light for OL WR TE and RB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 2 hours ago, kyle021 said: If they hire McDaniel i assume they'll target Waddle in a trade in the offseason McDaniel as a DC? That makes no sense at all. And has Waddle ever played db before? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 4 hours ago, kyle021 said: If they hire McDaniel i assume they'll target Waddle in a trade in the offseason Waddle will not be be available. DJ Moore is the most likely big name WR they could trade for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TF_Titan Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 3 hours ago, ctm said: Iirc, Borgonzi has said he wants to upgrade the DL. We've seen it throughout the playoffs. If your front 7 is dominant your defense is dominant. It doesn't matter who's in the secondary. It works the other way too...if your front 7 sucks your defense sucks. It also doesn't matter who's in the secondary. ctm, DCTitan, Omar, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 23 minutes ago, TF_Titan said: We've seen it throughout the playoffs. If your front 7 is dominant your defense is dominant. It doesn't matter who's in the secondary. It works the other way too...if your front 7 sucks your defense sucks. It also doesn't matter who's in the secondary. Based on the draft class alone there’s a high likelihood that they are going to add an edge at #4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 28 minutes ago, TF_Titan said: We've seen it throughout the playoffs. If your front 7 is dominant your defense is dominant. It doesn't matter who's in the secondary. It works the other way too...if your front 7 sucks your defense sucks. It also doesn't matter who's in the secondary. I asked a version of this earlier and got little response. Trying again..... Titans have holes everywhere. What position group is lower on the priority scale? Not ignored but lower value resources applied.....later draft picks and cheaper free agents? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.