Jump to content

Titans Offseason Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Just now, headhunter said:

We can get $30 million cutting Ridley, Sneed and Pollard.

But then you’re also adding running back to the list as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No idea where this nugget fits so thought it might worth starting a thread for all Titans non HC offseason discussion.   This was meant to happen last offseason but Sweat never showed up so

Who will we draft? The answer has been there the whole time.     

That’s a lot of hooch 

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, Callidus said:

Nabers went 6 because that class was absolutely stacked. Also ridley has terrible hands and cant block.

Ridley's drop rate out of college was about 7% (going by memory).  He was productive, fast and a good route runner. Who would you comp to Tate?   Exactly and Nabers is better than Tate.. he's more what I expect in a top 10 wr. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, cenj said:

I'll accept Love at our pick if they can develop him as a pure WR on the outside. 

 

That's what would make it worth it; not some two-way BS with Travis Hunter, but a top 3 NFL RB with homerun speed who can also straight up play WR on the outside.

RB playing  both WR and RB is not near the same as hunter going two ways on both sides of the ball.  That Love can be a legit WR as well as a RB does add to his value. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pragidealist said:

Ridley's drop rate out of college was about 7% (going by memory).  He was productive, fast and a good route runner. Who would you comp to Tate?   Exactly and Nabers is better than Tate.. he's more what I expect in a top 10 wr. 

 

 

Nabers is better than tate, my point was he went lower because of who else was in that draft. He should have gone 4 though. He was superior to mhj imo

 

Ridley isnt the worst comparison style wise but tate is better across the board and vastly superior in a couple ways. Tates drop rate for his whole college career is 3.8, 0% this past season. Ridley was 9.3%

Edited by Callidus
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said:

Obviously lol but it’s a joke meant to undermine my argument 

Haha. I understand your point of view believe me but at the end of the day you have to ask yourself who is the best offensive player this off-season in the draft or free agency. I think we'll add enough pieces on defense to make that kinda move 

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, cenj said:

I'll accept Love at our pick if they can develop him as a pure WR on the outside. 

 

That's what would make it worth it; not some two-way BS with Travis Hunter, but a top 3 NFL RB with homerun speed who can also straight up play WR on the outside.

 

He didn't have a ton of receptions, but he is known as a more natural hands catcher than body. Notre Dame did send him out into the slot. Used him on wheel routes and angle routes. His route tree is still basic, but he's known to have a strong work ethic so he can probably develop there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rns90 said:

He’s also 32 and highly paid .  It’s an easy decision to cut him. 

That's not been the conversation topic. Its about who Tate comps to and where he belongs in the first round. I don't really see Tate as a generational player like a Calvin Johnson. He's a fine mid first round WR and will be a decent pro probably. But he's not Calvin Johnson or Chase.  He comps to a slightly better version of Ridley when Ridley came out of college. maybe a bit higher but Ridley went 23.   so.. mid round first.. I prefer - if tehy can- get a generational talent in teh top 5.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pragidealist said:

  He comps to a slightly better version of Ridley when Ridley came out of college. maybe a bit higher but Ridley went 23.   so.. mid round first.. I prefer - if tehy can- get a generational talent in teh top 5.  

They are not similar players at all. One is a well rounded player and more physical .  
 

The other one is more of a deep speed guy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rns90 said:

They are not similar players at all. One is a well rounded player and more physical .  
 

The other one is more of a deep speed guy.

Ridley is known since college as a very good route runner with speed. He's never been just a deep speed guy.   

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...