Dangermode Posted January 5 Author Report Share Posted January 5 4 minutes ago, rns90 said: No one is trading up into the top 5 to take a RB. RB rarely go into the top 5 . Even rarer is that team moves up and gives valuable picks to get a RB that high Zeke #4 Fournette #4 CMC #8 Saquan #2 Bijan #8 Jeanty #6 Love has better college stats than all of them. titanskick8851 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangermode Posted January 5 Author Report Share Posted January 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 Just now, Dangermode said: Zeke #4 Fournette #4 CMC #8 Saquan #2 Bijan #8 Jeanty #6 Love has better college stats than all of them. That’s like 6 guys since 2012. And none of them was a team trading up. They all just sticked and picked . No one is trading up for a RB and giving up valuable assets. oldschool 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 31 minutes ago, Dangermode said: So does taking Bain that high with those short arms. At #4 I’d take Tyson or Love or trade back probably. Bain has production. The question is where he will play in the NFL, as a traditional EDGE or more of a 5T. I could see him rushing the passer at DT too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 2 minutes ago, Dangermode said: Zeke #4 Fournette #4 CMC #8 Saquan #2 Bijan #8 Jeanty #6 Love has better college stats than all of them. It would be pretty divisive, but I personally wouldn't be opposed to taking Love at 4. Do I think Borg does it? Probably not. But in a draft with a lot of question marks at the top, he's one of the few truly elite guys. Dangermode, GLinks, oldschool, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 1 minute ago, socaltitan said: It would be pretty divisive, but I personally wouldn't be opposed to taking Love at 4. Do I think Borg does it? Probably not. But in a draft with a lot of question marks at the top, he's one of the few truly elite guys. I can’t see it. They have too many needs to take a RB at 4. Mythos27 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 The raiders winning and getting to 3 wins should be a tiny bit of good news. 3 wins makes them tied with the other 3 team for total wins and subject to the rotation of tied teams at the top in subsequent rounds. This should give the Titans the 1st pick in the 4th, iirc. Dangermode 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 no to any RB in the top 5, has this board not learned their lesson with the likes of CJ and Henry and where they were drafted? MadMax, and Mythos27 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 Just now, rns90 said: I can’t see it. They have too many needs to take a RB at 4. I can't either, but this draft is weak and he looks like one of the only blue chip guys. Dangermode 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 1 minute ago, Dangermode said: Zeke #4 Fournette #4 CMC #8 Saquan #2 Bijan #8 Jeanty #6 Love has better college stats than all of them. Jeanty had 4700 yards, Bijan 3400, Barkley 3800, CMC 3900 (and over 1200 receiving), Fournette 3800, and Zeke 3900 in as many seasons as Love, who had 2800. I'm not saying Love isn't a good RB. He's the best one in this draft apparently, but that doesn't mean someone's trading a haul for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvgJoe Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 For me if we stick and pick it’s Bain. Bailey deserves consideration and if you trade down, guys like Tate, Fano, and Mauigoa come into play pending how far down you go. titanskick8851 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 Just now, oldschool said: no to any RB in the top 5, has this board not learned their lesson with the likes of CJ and Henry and where they were drafted? Obviously not. I’d prefer them take any other spot (outside of G/s/ILB) than a RB at 4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hyperion Posted January 5 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 5 We should want Love too. This team has no long term solution at RB and lacks game breakers. Alcibiades, GLinks, Chance9, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Face Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 21 minutes ago, rns90 said: Who is going to give up draft currency to move up for a RB? by currency I mean at least a day 2 pick Mike Ditka. And he’s still fucking alive. Somebody hire this man. I mean, I know it was over 25 years ago but even more shocking than Ditka trading his entire draft plus the next years 1st to take Ricky Williams 5 was that the Colts picked Edgerrin at 4 after the top 3 QB’s, which leads me to believe they turned down the Saints offer down. rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted January 5 Report Share Posted January 5 Borgonzi will go RBBC in some form until he get the rest of the roster in order, rns90, woolfolksunclesuncle, and titanskick8851 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.