Jump to content

Titans Get The #4 Pick In The Draft


Recommended Posts

If we take a RB at #4, even the best RB in a decade, I'm going to be upset. However, I'm sure he's a phenomenal player and will be exciting to watch with Cam Ward. I'll do my best to rationalize it, telling myself that his ability to become the slot WR makes him more important. 

 

But if these EDGE guys all dominate and become 10+ sack guys...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Love immediately makes you a more explosive team. He's going to add 10-20 TDs a year through the run and pass game. He's going to upgrade your pass protection. He's going to force teams to account for

The Jaguars gave up what again for Travis Hunter? This notion we should take less capital is kind of mind boggling. If a team wants to move then they need to pay the full price.

Rickey   

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, rns90 said:

Huh?  Bailey and Tate are worthy of the pick at 4.

 

I'll give you that on Bailey, but if we fill that need in FA with Oweh, that will not be a need. I'm personally not a huge fan of Tate.

Edited by BeedoeLaw
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cenj said:

 

 

But if these EDGE guys all dominate and become 10+ sack guys...

Yeah, it’s like guys never watched the playoffs.  You win with top level line play.  A top level RB is not essential for team success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can totally buy that Love is #1 on their talent board, but it's hard to believe they'd stick at #4 and go RB. Borgonzi has talked so much about getting more top 100 picks and building the roster. He seems to understand positional value.

 

However, I'll admit that if it's between a truly great RB and another lead-footed/short armed tackle that we plan to change positions, then give me a goddamn RB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cenj said:

 

However, I'll admit that if it's between a truly great RB and another lead-footed/short armed tackle that we plan to change positions, then give me a goddamn RB.

Agreed .  But those guys are getting paid too especially in FA.  Even C.


If you’re trying to totally max out a pick that high , outside of trading it,  you are not going to take a position like RB/LB/S, and instead focus on the other ones .

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, cenj said:

If we take a RB at #4, even the best RB in a decade, I'm going to be upset. However, I'm sure he's a phenomenal player and will be exciting to watch with Cam Ward. I'll do my best to rationalize it, telling myself that his ability to become the slot WR makes him more important. 

 

But if these EDGE guys all dominate and become 10+ sack guys...

 

 

I think fans may see it differently if you dont call it RB?

 

If a rookie offensive player you selected at #4 gives you 1800 yards from scrimmage and 10 tds, you will take that no question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cenj said:

I can totally buy that Love is #1 on their talent board, but it's hard to believe they'd stick at #4 and go RB. Borgonzi has talked so much about getting more top 100 picks and building the roster. He seems to understand positional value.

 

However, I'll admit that if it's between a truly great RB and another lead-footed/short armed tackle that we plan to change positions, then give me a goddamn RB.

 

Elite Talent > Perceived Positional Value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, tgo said:

 

I don't think so - several teams will be waiting to grab him and reportedly the Giants at number 5 are considered a prime trade up spot for teams wanting to jump others for him. 

 

I think you have to take him at 4 or the chance of getting him greatly diminishes. Which is dumb. 

I’m sure the Giants love that that’s out there lol and couldn’t possibly have put it out there themselves 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, titansfan said:

 

 

I think fans may see it differently if you dont call it RB?

 

If a rookie offensive player you selected at #4 gives you 1800 yards from scrimmage and 10 tds, you will take that no question.

In my opinion, he does more to help Cam Ward than a rookie WR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rns90 said:

Huh?  Bailey and Tate are worthy of the pick at 4.

 

 

I feel like in a better draft these guys would be looked at as more mid 1st round players. They're worthy of pick 4 because it's a weak draft. Love looks like one of the true elite talents but yes (gulp) he's a RB. We'll see where Borg stands on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...