Jump to content

titansfan

Members
  • Posts

    14,631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

About titansfan

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Where you want to be

Recent Profile Visitors

19,138 profile views

titansfan's Achievements

Hall Of Famer

Hall Of Famer (5/5)

  1. The reason why yesterday's win didn't feel all the way "good" has nothing to do with a potential draft pick... its that we nearly lost to another bad team because we didn't put the game away.
  2. Cam is the right QB for this team. That's all I got out of that. And, we shouldn't be reading about this.
  3. I just want more data points... Femi and Faulk are two totally different players for example. Im willing to bet that Borgonzi takes Reese over Faulk despite you all thinking Faulk fits his ideal mold perfectly. I think he just happens to value length from a physical standpoint and values power over speed.
  4. I think Reese is less polished than Micah Parsons was as in, but has a higher ceiling as a run defender. He has better instincts there, imo, and uses his power extremely well. As a pass rusher hes more projection but youre betting on high level traits. Parsons pretty much came into the league as an elite pass rusher.
  5. I think we overstate a bit and draw too well formed conclusions of what Borgonzi said about edges. I still can't find all the quotes, but basically he said he valued length and power. Power is more translateable from college to the pros than outright speed. Good OTs can contain most speed rushers, but great power extending to the hands is every OTs weakness. I personally think Faulk is going to end up as a great, possible all pro level 5 tech. Hes more on the vein of Calais Campbell or Deforest Buckner, imo. And I expect thats how NFL evaluators will see him as well.
  6. Hes a demon in the backfield... I think as soon as next year he may lead all safeties in TFLs. He's similar to Derwin James or prime Jamal Adams in a lot of ways. Not as smooth or instinctual in coverage.. but in the box hes high level
  7. Lol that's a program decision beginning at the President level. It's more than just football-- its them withholding their economic pull from the benefit of ESPN
  8. The analytics would say you need to go for two, 3-5 times before you can expect to see favorable odds
  9. Honestly if rebuilding an NFL team is as simple as just losing each season to get the #1 pick then I dont understand why so many organizations spend so much effort on finding a GM
  10. For the losers... when do you decide to start rooting for losses each season? And which season do you finally decide to root for wins!?
  11. For the losers... when do you decide to start rooting for losses each season? And which season do you finally decide to root for wins!?
  12. I wouldn't be upset about Schwartz but I like him more as a DC
  13. Team was on the verge from moving away from Derrick Henry.. Corey Davis was a disappointment up until his final year where he ended up being a great TWO receiver. Conklin wasn't even retained after his first contract. So despite the fruits brought to us by having the 1st pick in 2016-- it really didn't change our trajectory longterm
  14. Lol you guys are looking at this like losers. We're not entitled to the 1st pick or any additional picks so its not like we lost anything. Borgonzi is good enough that if its pick #4 then that means in the 2nd round he'll trade down and get an extra top 100 pick. Sure its easier to get talented players with earlier picks but the talent doesn't run out after the 1st. Trust the scouts and GM
×
×
  • Create New...