IsntLifeFunny Posted Thursday at 12:43 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:43 AM 10 minutes ago, oldschool said: Only because you overvalue #4 when both Edges are gone and there really is no premium talent left at valuable positions. I would agree if the top 10 were stacked, its not. It isn't that I even disagree. At 12 and 20 you could potentially Bain and Cooper Jr. Or Cooper Jr and Malakie Lawrence. It's the precedent and is simply a bad trade. If they want to part with a player or 2027 currency then that's different. A pure pick swap for the #4 pick in the draft is hogwash. Callidus, rns90, NashvilleNinja, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Thursday at 12:47 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:47 AM 3 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: It isn't that I even disagree. At 12 and 20 you could potentially Bain and Cooper Jr. Or Cooper Jr and Malakie Lawrence. It's the precedent and is simply a bad trade. If they want to part with a player or 2027 currency then that's different. A pure pick swap for the #4 pick in the draft is hogwash. I might be ok with them giving up a day 3 pick if Dallas insists but 66 is a non starter unless they add in something equal to it. That pick could yield a starter for us. DCTitan, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted Thursday at 12:48 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:48 AM 1 minute ago, rns90 said: I don’t really think we can expect overpays like that. We might have to take less and I don’t think they will do that , not significantly anyway. I mean if the value is close to equal and they can get 12 and 20 or anything close like that from another team (include 2027 high picks ), then they pull the trigger. This is all assuming that Reese/Bailey aren’t there at 4. No, I wasn't expecting it. But if we're going strictly value for value in comparison to the Browns/Jags trade the Cowboys could offer every pick they have in this draft and they'd still only be halfway there to the same value the Browns got. The only way to make a trade where the Titans give up 66 worth it for the Titans is a future high pick. And I think someone said the Cowboys aren't even allowed to trade a 1st from next year anyway yet. Idk the rule for that though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted Thursday at 12:49 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:49 AM 1 minute ago, rns90 said: That pick could yield a starter for us. Kevin Winston says hi. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted Thursday at 12:58 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:58 AM Hyperion 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted Thursday at 01:00 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 01:00 AM Hyperion, and Justafan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted Thursday at 01:07 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 01:07 AM Anything of note in this article? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolfolksunclesuncle Posted Thursday at 01:22 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 01:22 AM 2 hours ago, TeamRamrod said: What else we supposed to talk about? Derrick Henry or Chris Johnson again? Eddie George, @Legaltitan's spider bite, whether you'd rather have a knife or bat in a fight, etc...! oldschool, and Supernope 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted Thursday at 01:34 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 01:34 AM 12 minutes ago, woolfolksunclesuncle said: Eddie George, @Legaltitan's spider bite, whether you'd rather have a knife or bat in a fight, etc...! Definitely a bat. woolfolksunclesuncle 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted Thursday at 01:39 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 01:39 AM Justafan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nash Posted Thursday at 02:07 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 02:07 AM Any significance to the Jets cancelling David Bailey's 30 visit?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion Posted Thursday at 02:15 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 02:15 AM (edited) 8 minutes ago, Nash said: Any significance to the Jets cancelling David Bailey's 30 visit?? It's now a tie for Reese and Bailey to be the Jets pick. They're both listed as -115. Edited Thursday at 02:17 AM by Hyperion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted Thursday at 02:16 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 02:16 AM 7 minutes ago, Nash said: Any significance to the Jets cancelling David Bailey's 30 visit?? It signals they have made their decision between Reese and Bailey. Important to point out the Jets had already met Bailey twice during the pre-draft process. japan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnsideKick Posted Thursday at 03:08 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 03:08 AM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted Thursday at 04:01 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 04:01 AM (edited) 3 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said: It isn't that I even disagree. At 12 and 20 you could potentially Bain and Cooper Jr. Or Cooper Jr and Malakie Lawrence. It's the precedent and is simply a bad trade. If they want to part with a player or 2027 currency then that's different. A pure pick swap for the #4 pick in the draft is hogwash. Hey, let's just get crazy. 3 team trade. Cowboys get #4. Titans get #7 and WR George Pickens. Commanders get #12, #20 and #66. Titans draft Love at #7 Walk away w/ an offense of: QB: Cam Ward RB: Jeremiyah Love WR1: Calvin Ridley WR2: George Pickens WR3: WanDale Robinson haha Hell... I'll give the Commanders Ayomanor. Edited Thursday at 04:04 AM by reo Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.