AussieTitanFan08 Posted Wednesday at 10:44 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:44 PM 16 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said: Oh Love it just throws a little more intrigue into pick #2 a week out from the draft. titanruss, titanskick8851, and OnsideKick 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnsideKick Posted Wednesday at 10:46 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:46 PM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted Wednesday at 10:59 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:59 PM 20 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: the Jags paid a fortune to move 3 spots and we are supposed to pick swap for the Cowboys to jump from 12 to 4? I would pass. Lol Yeah, and for a guy they possibly could've gotten anyway 3 picks later at their original spot. It's almost as if we're (fans) afraid of fucking up a good thing so we (fans) are more willing to acquiesce on shit like this. Nah, Cowboys were dumb enough to trade Parsons away to get the extra pick. They can part ways with it just as stupidly. I still don't know if I'd want to trade with them. Like you said, we'd be moving away from the elite talent. Now... if we'd lost the Cardinals and either the Browns or Chiefs game like we should have we wouldn't have that problem right now. We'd be fielding offers from all these QB thirsty ass teams looking to trade the farm for Mendoza. The Jets could have traded us 2 and 16 (and more). We then could have drafted whoever we wanted or traded down for another huge haul and absolutely owned this draft and turbocharged tf out of this rebuild. *sigh* IsntLifeFunny, and Pragidealist 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted Wednesday at 11:00 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:00 PM 16 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: It is reportedly a disc issue for Mauigoa and it was Albert Breer who reported some teams feels it will eventually need surgery to fix. Hell no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted Wednesday at 11:03 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:03 PM 2 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: Lol Yeah, and for a guy they possibly could've gotten anyway 3 picks later at their original spot. It's almost as if we're (fans) afraid of fucking up a good thing so we (fans) are more willing to acquiesce on shit like this. Nah, Cowboys were dumb enough to trade Parsons away to get the extra pick. They can part ways with it just as stupidly. I still don't know if I'd want to trade with them. Like you said, we'd be moving away from the elite talent. Now... if we'd lost the Cardinals and either the Browns or Chiefs game like we should have we wouldn't have that problem right now. We'd be fielding offers from all these QB thirsty ass teams looking to trade the farm for Mendoza. The Jets could have traded us 2 and 16 (and more). We then could have drafted whoever we wanted or traded down for another huge haul and absolutely owned the this draft and turbocharged tf out of this rebuild. *sigh* But but. those wins mattered, man. I mean.. We'll have a differetn coachign staff, differnet offensive line and different wr- maybe a differnet rb.. but-- they mattered bc winning those two games is gong to build a winning culture and were the difference in Cam coming back confident or totally not confident next year. (did i get all the stupid thing ppl were saying?" NashvilleNinja 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeedoeLaw Posted Wednesday at 11:08 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:08 PM 1 hour ago, BTiger3733 said: Todd McShay (who is pretty connected to our front office) said on his podcast today that "it's Jeremiyah Love at #4... But if Bailey or Reese are there don't be shocked if they pivot and go ED....They would add a weapon on offense who a lot of teams have as the #1 player in the draft but if they're staring at Arvell Reese at 4, they could go in that direction. That's the information I'm getting." Sounds like our board, according to McShay, could be: 1) Reese 2) Bailey 3) Love Edit: Adding that this could make sense as to why we leaked our Love interest so early. We're happy taking Love at 4, but if we can get someone to trade up with ARI for Love then we get one of the ED's who's higher on our board. Doesn't sound like McShay knows that they would pivot. He is guessing that they could pivot. IJS titanruss, and Pragidealist 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted Wednesday at 11:11 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:11 PM 31 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: This isn't a deep draft and we would be trading away from the elite talent with a roster bereft of elite talent. There's no way I'm giving up the 3rd rounder. If we do then obviously Borgonzi disagrees and doesn't see the positional value of a guy like Love or Styles as worth it, or doesn't grade Tate as an elite talent. Who knows how it works out, but the Jags paid a fortune to move 3 spots and we are supposed to pick swap for the Cowboys to jump from 12 to 4? I would pass. IsntLifeFunny, and Pragidealist 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted Wednesday at 11:17 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:17 PM 4 minutes ago, Callidus said: Callidus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted Wednesday at 11:17 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:17 PM 9 minutes ago, BeedoeLaw said: Doesn't sound like McShay knows that they would pivot. He is guessing that they could pivot. IJS I caught that too. I found that interesting actually.. He feels confident the Titans are planning on love at 4.. then he is speculating on IF an edge is there what they would do. BeedoeLaw 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted Wednesday at 11:19 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:19 PM 15 minutes ago, Pragidealist said: But but. those wins mattered, man. I mean.. We'll have a differetn coachign staff, differnet offensive line and different wr- maybe a differnet rb.. but-- they mattered bc winning those two games is gong to build a winning culture and were the difference in Cam coming back confident or totally not confident next year. (did i get all the stupid thing ppl were saying?" The argument wasn't exactly that. It was that the team would never intentionally tank. This wasn't my argument of course and I laughed at the notion those soft ass wins did anything at all for the team. Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnsideKick Posted Wednesday at 11:38 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:38 PM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted Wednesday at 11:54 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:54 PM OnsideKick 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post titanskick8851 Posted Wednesday at 11:58 PM Popular Post Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:58 PM I feel like people are forgetting that Warner was a 3rd round pick. socaljake, IsntLifeFunny, Pragidealist, and 2 others 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter Posted Thursday at 12:00 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:00 AM 1 minute ago, titanskick8851 said: I feel like people are forgetting that Warner was a 3rd round pick. And it's a deep LB draft titanskick8851, and titanruss 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted Thursday at 12:02 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:02 AM 1 minute ago, titanskick8851 said: I feel like people are forgetting that Warner was a 3rd round pick. And if teams thought he would turn out to be as good as he did he wouldn't of been a 3rd round pick. The big difference is Styles is being projected to be NFL level Warner not College Football level Warner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.