rns90 Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM 11 minutes ago, oldschool said: 12 and 20 for 4 and 66 is a no brainer what are we even doing here? I doubt the Cowboys offer up both picks anyway. You can always trade down from 20 or 35 if you wanted to recoup that 3rd rounder anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted Wednesday at 09:48 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 09:48 PM (edited) 18 minutes ago, oldschool said: 12 and 20 for 4 and 66 is a no brainer what are we even doing here? You dont do it because trading up costs a premium. Especially into the top 5. You can get that deal without 66. May cost you 101 or something else but you can do it if they really want someone. Edited Wednesday at 09:48 PM by Callidus NashvilleNinja, and TerryBoats 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTiger3733 Posted Wednesday at 09:50 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 09:50 PM (edited) Todd McShay (who is pretty connected to our front office) said on his podcast today that "it's Jeremiyah Love at #4... But if Bailey or Reese are there don't be shocked if they pivot and go ED....They would add a weapon on offense who a lot of teams have as the #1 player in the draft but if they're staring at Arvell Reese at 4, they could go in that direction. That's the information I'm getting." Sounds like our board, according to McShay, could be: 1) Reese 2) Bailey 3) Love Edit: Adding that this could make sense as to why we leaked our Love interest so early. We're happy taking Love at 4, but if we can get someone to trade up with ARI for Love then we get one of the ED's who's higher on our board. Edited Wednesday at 09:59 PM by BTiger3733 rns90, and titanskick8851 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Wednesday at 09:52 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 09:52 PM 1 minute ago, BTiger3733 said: Todd McShay (who is pretty connected to our front office) said on his podcast today that "it's Jeremiyah Love at #4... But if Bailey or Reese are there don't be shocked if they pivot and go ED....They would add a weapon on offense who a lot of teams have as the #1 player in the draft but if they're staring at Arvell Reese at 4, they could go in that direction. That's the information I'm getting." Sounds like our board, according to McShay, could be: 1) Reese 2) Bailey 3) Love It’s basically your second point , if one of the edge rushers is there , that’s the pick . If not it’s Love. He just restated it in a different way with a focus on Love. BeedoeLaw 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted Wednesday at 09:54 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 09:54 PM 1 hour ago, Callidus said: Is water wet or does it make other things wet? Something wet just means water left behind... so both? rns90, and Callidus 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted Wednesday at 10:01 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:01 PM 31 minutes ago, oldschool said: 12 and 20 for 4 and 66 is a no brainer what are we even doing here? Nah. NashvilleNinja 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted Wednesday at 10:24 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:24 PM 13 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Nah. The Cowboys can pay that premium if they want us to walk away from Love/Tate/whoever. Save the pick swapping for day 3. Callidus, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted Wednesday at 10:27 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:27 PM Oh Supernope, and titanskick8851 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted Wednesday at 10:34 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:34 PM 8 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said: Oh Jets doing Jets things again? IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBukafax Posted Wednesday at 10:36 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:36 PM It’s funny all the pages that have passed. Y’all running around in circles when it’s always been Love lol Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted Wednesday at 10:36 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:36 PM 1 hour ago, oldschool said: 12 and 20 for 4 and 66 is a no brainer what are we even doing here? They could get a year 1 starter at WR and on defense with that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM 13 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: The Cowboys can pay that premium if they want us to walk away from Love/Tate/whoever. Save the pick swapping for day 3. This isn't a deep draft and we would be trading away from the elite talent with a roster bereft of elite talent. There's no way I'm giving up the 3rd rounder. If we do then obviously Borgonzi disagrees and doesn't see the positional value of a guy like Love or Styles as worth it, or doesn't grade Tate as an elite talent. Who knows how it works out, but the Jags paid a fortune to move 3 spots and we are supposed to pick swap for the Cowboys to jump from 12 to 4? I would pass. Callidus, NashvilleNinja, and DCTitan 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted Wednesday at 10:43 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:43 PM 1 hour ago, TeamRamrod said: We have no idea what the back issue is or isn’t. It is reportedly a disc issue for Mauigoa and it was Albert Breer who reported some teams feels it will eventually need surgery to fix. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChosenTitan Posted Wednesday at 10:43 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:43 PM 16 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said: Oh That means jets are locked in on taking him Supernope 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted Wednesday at 10:44 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 10:44 PM 7 minutes ago, TheBukafax said: It’s funny all the pages that have passed. Y’all running around in circles when it’s always been Love lol What else we supposed to talk about? Derrick Henry or Chris Johnson again? Supernope, and IsntLifeFunny 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.