Jump to content

Amy Adams Strunk likely behind stripping Brian Callahan of his play-calling(Terry McCormick)


OILERMAN

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, rns90 said:

Let’s be honest.  She owns the team .  Thats different.

 

She isn’t butting in on some complicated business matter.

 

Her only “expertise” that’s she needs is answering a yes/no question that’s been answered before by her: is this the right coach moving forward for  our team?

I would've fired him when he started the rookie's first "series" taking snaps in his own end zone + didn't know the rules of the game he was coaching

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 714
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

rumor is Amy was the one demanding all the wr screens

Why hire Brinker and give him total control over football decisions if you're going to meddle and make decisions like this.    She's just like her dad if this story is true and there is litt

It's 1 of 32. It is going to attract a quality candidate. The bears fired Matt Eberflus midseason and hired Ben Johnson.    This whole notion of "no one is going to want the job" is bullshit

Posted Images

Callahan in-game has been atrocious. His game plans have been atrocious. His challenges: atrocious. I don't know a single thing he's done well except "he's nice and honest." Couldn't have been a more juxtaposed Vrabel hire. 

 

I'm tired of this shit. Give me a coach like MLF, a young OC with creative talent or fuck off and sell the team. But the decision to make a change at HC wasn't meddling or wrong or dysfunctional. Hiring a nepo baby who never called plays: now that's dysfunctional. And I know she relied on Brinker for that decision. Fire his ass too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldschool said:

 

What I said is that they didn't have a clear plan to execute the firing on Monday. Honestly you can argue they should have been prepared for it because it was clear Callahan lost the team and the team was getting worse each week. I'm not sure why some think the bye was worth waiting for. Callahan was done here and there was no point waiting to make a move. business 101.

 

lol at the idea the new HC is now saddled with Ward. This isn't a Levis situations. The new HC will view Ward as a major asset like Vrabel did Maye. I don't get the infatuation with total org teardown to ensure the GM, HC, and QB all arrive at the same time. How often does that even happen? have teams that do it that way have more success? 

 

They didn't have a plan because the decision was 100% AAS (as you said!), and they looked stressed (as you said!) at the presser because they did not expect this to happen. 

 

Clearly the football guys didn't want to do this. AAS did it for non-football reasons (as you said!). 

 

If you think firing him now is the right call, explain why you think Brinker and Borganzi wanted to allow him to keep coaching and why that doesn't make their football judgment suspect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Titans279 said:

If you think firing him now is the right call, explain why you think Brinker and Borganzi wanted to allow him to keep coaching and why that doesn't make their football judgment suspect.

I've said this as well but ... if you assume (as I think everyone does because I haven't heard anyone say otherwise) that they would have fired Callahan at the end of the year then it's really just a question of when is best and what are you risking and how does it play out. It's less about whether or not they recognize he's a problem. How do stable, successful organizations make decisions?

 

I can easily imagine that people who come from stable, successful franchises will rate staying the course as a smaller risk than the instability that arises from foundational leadership changes, whereas people who are sick of losing and impatient for success will see removal of perceived rot as preferable to stay the course.

 

I would have personally fired the guy weeks ago, if not in the off season, but it's my perspective that this type of judgment is the exact reason you have these guys in place. Overriding their will, even if I would independently do what you're doing in overriding it, is a bad indicator for an owner already prone to changes of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheBukafax said:

Oh shit they fired Asst. Tom Jones. Can’t believe they just did that when they fired Callahan 2 days ago. Shows how damaged this org truly is. There was no cohesive firing strategy to align them to happen at once. This is erratic behaviour, the teams doomed.

I dont think i care. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SleepingTitan said:

I would've fired him when he started the rookie's first "series" taking snaps in his own end zone + didn't know the rules of the game he was coaching

He was basically on thin ice.  Ship up or shape out.  You’re on you’re last chance etc.

 

He crashed and burned in a spectacular fashion where they had to fire him.  
 

Gotta admit I didn’t expect this level of confidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is such a nothing story. "Likely" the "impetus"? well no shit. That could just mean she was stressing the need for change and someone in the football ops hierarchy put forward stripping play calling duties. It doesn't actually have to suggest she came up with the idea and enforced it, strictly based on the definition of words used.

 

Also, obviously her fingerprints were on how the firing went down. Would be pretty much impossible for them not to be.

 

Nothing story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, OzTitan said:

This is such a nothing story. "Likely" the "impetus"? well no shit. That could just mean she was stressing the need for change and someone in the football ops hierarchy put forward stripping play calling duties. It doesn't actually have to suggest she came up with the idea and enforced it, strictly based on the definition of words used.

 

Also, obviously her fingerprints were on how the firing went down. Would be pretty much impossible for them not to be.

 

Nothing story.

 

So, basically... if in doubt, zoom out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's okay to admit that we may be in a call is coming from inside the house type situation. What we do know is the entire situation and transition looks unorganized. Given the state of the team and our recent history it's a bad sign and shows organizational dysfunction. Those are facts regardless of whether she mandated a change be made to the coaching structure (taking the play calls away). 

Edited by IsntLifeFunny
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...