TerryBoats Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Just now, SleepingTitan said: Are you fucking retarded? Explain how it's debatable that last year's OL + an average LT is worse than the 2016/17 OLs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Just now, SleepingTitan said: Are you fucking retarded? Are you?  He likely meant in terms of cap space % mixed with draft capital investment. In that instance, yes he's correct. TerryBoats 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 4 minutes ago, Callidus said: Ajani? If he’s still there. Maybe Anthony Belton, Charles Grant, Hollin Pierce, Logan Brown, or Carson Vinson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Potential for a dominant run blocking right side of the OL. Omar 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrill Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 4 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Good point, but that's the risk of needing to be great at RT versus okay at LT to get paid.  This absolutely takes tackle out of play at 35. Only way they're going tackle now is bargain shopping or after a huge trade down and BPA. It’s more likely we don’t take one at #35 but it does not preclude us from doing so. It’s a front loaded deal which means we probably have an ok out in two years.  It’s also a copy cat league and the eagles just won a superbowl by drafting a ton of DL and OTs. They lost Kelce and didn’t miss a beat because they’ve been stacking offensive linemen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Just now, TerryBoats said: Explain how it's debatable that last year's OL + an average LT is worse than the 2016/17 OLs. 2016/17 really has no bearing on this decision or frankly even a place in this discussion. The market and cap are different. The team is different.  An average LT who allows you to move your below average rookie to his ideal position in hopes that he could be great is huge. It's a 4 year deal that will look really fucking cheap in 2 years if he works out to be "average" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 This frees up that 1st round pick to use on Cam Skattebo. Supernope, and Nash 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Just now, TerryBoats said: Explain how it's debatable that last year's OL + an average LT is worse than the 2016/17 OLs. That and the fact you didn't just mean actual dollars.  It's possible Moore comes into a League of His Own type shit, but no he isn't as good as Lewan. Latham could be as good as Conklin.  Let's draw it out  Lewan V Moore= Lewan  Saffold V Sko= draw at best with massive capital thrown at both but more capital towards Sko  Jones V Cush= draw if Cush hits. Way more capital towards Cush. Winner Ben Jones by a mile  RG we traded for versus ????= Who knows but probably better then given money or investment  Conklin V Latham= I think this one will even out actually.  Overall, yes better likely play from a dominant group in 17 with more investment in the current group. Your argument is still pretty shitty though. headhunter 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 1 minute ago, Thrill said: It’s more likely we don’t take one at #35 but it does not preclude us from doing so. It’s a front loaded deal which means we probably have an ok out in two years.  It’s also a copy cat league and the eagles just won a superbowl by drafting a ton of DL and OTs. They lost Kelce and didn’t miss a beat because they’ve been stacking offensive linemen. We are still missing a starting guard. As of today that’s a more likely 2nd round pick. Thrill 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTiger3733 Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 https://x.com/NoFlagsFilm/status/1899161425232216138 ChemEngr79, IsntLifeFunny, and Starkiller 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 1 minute ago, Thrill said: It’s more likely we don’t take one at #35 but it does not preclude us from doing so. It’s a front loaded deal which means we probably have an ok out in two years.  It’s also a copy cat league and the eagles just won a superbowl by drafting a ton of DL and OTs. They lost Kelce and didn’t miss a beat because they’ve been stacking offensive linemen. It precludes us from doing so with the investment. We have too many holes man. We just closed one. No way 35 isn't used on an immediate hole. We just let Landry walk lol we have Ridley and whom? No safety...etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 1 hour ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: Â Moore has the most sacks allowed (34) and pressures (181) since entering the NFL in 2021 (per The Athletic). Â Â Â tgo, Omar, and Starkiller 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevenths78 Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 38 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said:  Were they sacks allowed by Moore? How many did Russell Wilson create himself? Fair Question, but who will create more Sacks: Levis/Ward or Russell Wilson? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishTitansFan Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 1 minute ago, BTiger3733 said: https://x.com/NoFlagsFilm/status/1899161425232216138 Kinda similar to what I saw. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 1 hour ago, TampaTitan said: The fact this could end up meaning we drafted a RT at 7 overall is fun... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.