Jump to content

Head Coaches Performance Over Expectation


TheBukafax

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, TerryBoats said:

Still, Levis was 3-5.  So he had the same # of wins as the team this year in half the games.    And that was without the improvements to the OL and Ridley.

One of those was a 7pt win over the 1-10 Panthers where Levis had 185yds passing and Henry rushed for our only TDs.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I still think Callahan is a good coach. Maybe I’ll be wrong 🤷‍♂️ 

Can't win without a QB no matter who you are

I'm not defending Callahan here but what a ridiculous data exercise. Shit like this is why people talk shit about nerds and analytics. 

1 minute ago, TerryBoats said:

Now do the offensive passing output from the Miami game.  

Looking at a single game is not how you evaluate a quarterback. We have a full sample size. We know the potential. We also know the reality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Downtown said:

Also have to acknowledge the statistical luck that Levis had last season avoiding turnovers from his bad passes. That did not repeat itself in 2024. 

The team was terrible in every area.  30th in points allowed, 25th in Defensive EPA, horrific ST #s, bad OL, and one of the most penalized.  You can hate Levis all you want, but the results this season were the reflection of a really bad team, not a really bad QB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
1 hour ago, Titandan said:

I was looking for a post regarding headcoaches and I've previously wanted Belichick when he was available last year but I think it's clear we dodged a bullet. 

 

I think his sugar baby is a worse distraction than Mahomes' wife and brother combined. 

 

 

At first, I was like wtf.  The I remember they were in Carolina!!!!Happy Monday Night Raw GIF by WWE

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, japan said:

Still kind of hard to believe that he wasn't cleaned out with Ran.  I assume Brinker probably wanted to but Strunk was sick of paying out so much money to fired guys...

I think they gave him a mulligan year because the roster was so poorly constructed and QB play was so bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, socaltitan said:

Of course. Every HC all of a sudden looks better when they have the right QB

 If the team is good, sure.  This team, however, was outclassed in all areas by even the league's worst units. Compared to the previous season under Vrabel-when they won twice as many games and were at least reasonably competitive in the losses - it's easy to conclude that coaching was a major contributor to this.

 

Improving the most important position obviously helps, but without improvement to the poor offensive and defensive playcalling/gameplanning and STs, it will be another ugly year.

Edited by TerryBoats
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2025 at 4:56 PM, TerryBoats said:

Callahan was so bad that Vrabel went from having to settle for a consultant gig in Cleveland to being a top name in the HC market in just one year.

 

What?  That's hyperbole at it's finest.  He was a top name only for the team that wanted him for the last 2-3 years, and Callahan struggling to get meatheads roster to perform is more a testament to meathead, than Callahan.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...