Popular Post IsntLifeFunny Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 Yes, having a president openly go to the postmaster and try to injure a business over a political grievance so as to manipulate or control that businness’ behavior is the definition of fascism. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/business/economy/trump-personally-pushed-postmaster-general-to-double-rates-on-amazon-other-firms/2018/05/18/2b6438d2-5931-11e8-858f-12becb4d6067_story.html Omar, pat, CreepingDeath, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMax Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 Poor ben4russia reo, IsntLifeFunny, CreepingDeath, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMax Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, MadMax said: Poor ben4russia бедный бен4россия CreepingDeath 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Legaltitan Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 9 hours ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said: Do you even know what hearsay is? Narrator: He did not, in fact, know what it is. ChesterCopperpot1, MadMax, T-RAC, and 2 others 2 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 12 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Yes, having a president openly go to the postmaster and try to injure a business over a political grievance so as to manipulate or control that businness’ behavior is the definition of fascism. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/business/economy/trump-personally-pushed-postmaster-general-to-double-rates-on-amazon-other-firms/2018/05/18/2b6438d2-5931-11e8-858f-12becb4d6067_story.html Well shit, I mean, if you are going to get all technical and stuff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ctm Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 Bezos had a top security firm investigating how AMI got his texts and photos. This is what AMI wanted stopped.....Bezos investigation. It's important to keep in focus what AMI wanted. ChesterCopperpot1, Omar, titansfb, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Legaltitan Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 This story is absolutely fascinating and surreal. There are so many threads to this that are going to get untangled. I noticed Jake has shut up now, but sometimes I am still amazed at his lack of insight. Bezos himself exposed very embarrassing information about himself to get ahead of the Enquirer and keep them from extorting him, yet Jake wants proof that they were extorting him? I mean, does he think Bezos just woke up and for shits and giggles decided to tell the whole world that there are dick pics and other very embarrassing stuff about him? I get it why you want to "see the evidence" in this day and age, but poor Jake doesn't even understand his own arguments. Btowner, Omar, Titans_Win_Again, and 7 others 8 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 AMI has a no prosecute agreement with the Special Counsel, and yet they are willing to risk everything to dive back into this circus, and commit an obvious crime, IN WRITING, against the richest man in the world. I would say this is profound arrogance, but it's beyond that. It is total suicide to anyone with half a brain. Pecker is probably not a stupid man. So you have to ask yourself, why would someone who stands to lose everything by doing something where there is a very big chance he will get exposed for doing it, willing to take such a crazy chance? reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 Trump hates Bezos, but he has yet to tweet about this. Why the silence? Is that a tell? OILERMAN, reo, and MadMax 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChesterCopperpot1 Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 59 minutes ago, Legaltitan said: Narrator: He did not, in fact, know what it is. It’s like he thinks there aren’t ways to get documents or out of court statements into court. Also, not ever out of court statement qualifies as hearsay. Being out of court is only part of the analysis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChesterCopperpot1 Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, ctm said: Bezos had a top security firm investigating how AMI got his texts and photos. This is what AMI wanted stopped.....Bezos investigation. It's important to keep in focus what AMI wanted. AMI fucked with the wrong billionaire. Peter Thiel brought down Gawker — which I didn’t agree with his tactics of funding a lawsuit — and Bezos May bring down AMI. Bezos wants to know how AMI got his texts — a very logical question — and AMI got mad he was trying to figure out how. That’s the meat and potatoes of this issue. Edited February 8, 2019 by ChesterCopperpot1 reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9 Nines Posted February 8, 2019 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Legaltitan said: AMI has a no prosecute agreement with the Special Counsel Is it AMI as a corporation or David Pecker as an individual? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted February 8, 2019 Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, 9 Nines said: Is it AMI as a corporation or David Pecker as an individual? AMI has a non-prosecution agreement with SDNY. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5540299-AMI-non-prosecution-agreement-with-SDNY.html Edited February 8, 2019 by ctm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MadMax Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said: All I want to see is the original in some form. I love how yall just take ppls word on shit and feel that that copy and paste job is considered proof. Hilarious. Answer me one question. Is what is in that article enough proof without the original? Ford also embarrassed herself. Did she not? Where was her proof? Just because someone embarrasses themselves to make someone else look worse, doesnt mean it's true or that there is actual proof. You guys will never learn. You believe anything someone says about someone you already have your mind made up on. You guys take 10 or 20% of a story and act as if you know all about it. Yall know jack shit other than what he is alleging. And what they are displaying as the email. Yall qhere duped by Ford. Yall were duped by the media about those HS kids. Yall eat up dirt and run with it. Until tall find out you were duped. Then yall are the mother fuckers that stfu and find something else to talk about. Well Hell's bells... You expect us to believe your bullshit without anything to back it up. reo, CreepingDeath, Justafan, and 3 others 2 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 'Nator Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 8, 2019 (edited) Jake's accusation here is so insanely, pants shittingly stupid, that it's hard to wrap your head around. Namely that billionaire Jeff Bezos typed up some fake emails about the Enquirer people trying to frame him with dick pics. Edited February 8, 2019 by 'Nator ChemEngr79, CreepingDeath, begooode, and 8 others 11 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.