OILERMAN Posted Sunday at 03:59 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 03:59 PM 1 hour ago, Jamalisms said: Yeah, that's right. I'm lying so as *not* to fit in. Good theory. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted Sunday at 04:03 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:03 PM Except when it comes to convicting Trump. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBukafax Posted Sunday at 04:14 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:14 PM 10 minutes ago, Jamalisms said: Except when it comes to convicting Trump. There are probably a lot of people like you on Trumps side actually. They haven’t actually seen him assault any children, so they’re just waiting for more evidence. Jamalisms, and CreepingDeath 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted Sunday at 04:19 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:19 PM 5 minutes ago, TheBukafax said: There are probably a lot of people like you on Trumps side actually. They haven’t actually seen him assault any children, so they’re just waiting for more evidence. If you took those photos into court and had to prove they were having sex, you would lose every time. Unanimously. The location only gets you so far. Other than that, you guys didn't choose yet another loser argument based on feels despite that you you could make simple points that actually hold water because they describe the difference in approach. Good job, please continue with the court of law approach. DecepticonShawn2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted Sunday at 04:46 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:46 PM 53 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said: Can take it further. Vrabel didn’t want Ran to draft Stroud, so he intentionally leaked it and torpedoed that chance knowing the Texans would take him at 2, which would deprive us the chance to take him. Too many moving parts there. rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted Sunday at 04:50 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:50 PM 3 hours ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said: “What? She tripped? Fell? Landed on his dick?” — Slim Shady Guilty conscience is a great song. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted Sunday at 04:50 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:50 PM 29 minutes ago, Jamalisms said: If you took those photos into court and had to prove they were having sex, you would lose every time. Unanimously. The location only gets you so far. If infidelity was a crime and this case went to court they would both undoubtedly be found guilty pretty easily The level of proof you're demanding is laughable Jamalisms, and rns90 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Sunday at 04:58 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:58 PM Where are the other friends that they were with? A few days out and still crickets. headhunter, titanruss, and Hyperion 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Sunday at 05:03 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:03 PM 3 hours ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said: It’s incredibly weird. And I’m not even seeing her called a whore as much as you might expect given the current political climate. Most of what I’m seeing is that her career is over and that she will never be taken seriously again. No one will feed her info and her whole job is info. It’s also interpretation of information . Look reporters are supposed to be objective. She was sleeping with Vrabel and almost all her stories involving him are all slanted towards him . Hyperion, Callidus, and OILERMAN 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted Sunday at 05:04 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:04 PM Just now, rns90 said: It’s also interpretation of information . Look reporters are supposed to be objective. She was sleeping with Vrabel and almost all her stories involving him are all slanted towards him . Purposely trying to reduce AJ Brown's trade value rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Sunday at 05:07 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:07 PM 1 minute ago, OILERMAN said: Purposely trying to reduce AJ Brown's trade value My fave was the one that she claimed Vrabel was a large and intimidating individual , that’s why teams were reluctant to hire him ! OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted Sunday at 05:07 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:07 PM 16 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: If infidelity was a crime and this case went to court they would both undoubtedly be found guilty pretty easily The level of proof you're demanding is laughable Laughable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted Sunday at 05:07 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:07 PM 16 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: If infidelity was a crime and this case went to court they would both undoubtedly be found guilty pretty easily The level of proof you're demanding is laughable poor jamal, doesn't understand the difference between beyond a reasonable doubt and preponderance of the evidence. @ChesterCopperpot1 get in here and educate the fool. OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted Sunday at 05:08 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:08 PM Just now, oldschool said: poor jamal, doesn't understand the difference between beyond a reasonable doubt and preponderance of the evidence. @ChesterCopperpot1 get in here and educate the fool. Lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted Sunday at 05:08 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:08 PM It's always amazing how any legitimate angle gets ignored and the dumbest fucking arguments get made and then doubled down on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.