TeamRamrod Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 8 minutes ago, headhunter said: If he was heavier and ran a 4.4 he said. No he said it would be a more sure fire thing if he did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeedoeLaw Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 NashvilleNinja, titanskick8851, and TerryBoats 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 3 hours ago, OILERMAN said: At 4 the Titans could be in a potential bad spot with a few assumptions Reese and Bailey are both gone, they are not sold on Bain and don't want a RB with the 4th pick in the draft and they don't view Tate as worth the 4th pick. Trade back is a very good option... you can't take at RB at 4. Supernope, and rns90 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 1 hour ago, titanskick8851 said: Yep that is the conundrum, but the good news is then you just revert back to who is the best player on their board (assuming no trade materializes), regardless of who that is (Love / Bain / Tate / Styles / Mauigoa / etc.) and have perfectly sound reasoning for drafting whichever player that is. I do wonder if the Titans could get a team like the Browns, Commanders, or Saints to make a small jump from #6 to #4, if they are worried about the Giants taking Tate or someone like KC, jumping them for Bain. You could just take lesser value in the return if you want and get something back vs. a haul, but maybe taking Love, Styles, or Bain at 6/7/8 feels better to them than taking them at 4. Personally, I don't see a difference and it would be splitting hairs. Take the player you think can be a big contributor if no major trade materializes and Bailey is off the board. I wouldn't want to trade back behind Washington. Anyone we'd want, so would they. We better not be in teh top 5 drafting for quite some time- so they need to make this count. titanskick8851, and BeedoeLaw 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 31 minutes ago, japan said: Trade back is a very good option... you can't take at RB at 4.. I think his ability to do things like this should make him more valuable than a typical RB. japan, IsntLifeFunny, and Pragidealist 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeedoeLaw Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 Supernope 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 1 minute ago, BeedoeLaw said: I think we're more likely to trade down than up. TerryBoats, airmcnair22, titanruss, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBukafax Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 21 minutes ago, BeedoeLaw said: Not a chance I’d send away a third essentially to go up 2 spots. rns90, and Pragidealist 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 1 minute ago, TheBukafax said: Not a chance I’d send away a third essentially to go up 2 spots. I could see us trying to packge Levis in some way to get another second but I dont know what that would take. I have a hard time including Levis in anything bc I have no idea what his value is out there. What his worth combined with X pick would be- but i dont see us trading up to 2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 Probably the most perfect mock draft I have seen for the Titans lol. Round 1 (No. 4 overall): David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech Round 2 (No. 35 overall): Denzel Boston, WR, Washington Round 3 (No. 66 overall): Keylan Rutledge, IOL, Georgia Tech Round 4 (No. 101 overall): Kyle Louis, LB, Pittsburgh Round 5 (No. 142 overall): Trey Zuhn III, C, Texas A&M Round 5 (No. 144 overall): Ephesians Prysock, CB, Washington Round 6 (No. 184 overall): DeShon Singleton, S, Nebraska Round 6 (No. 194 overall): Travis Burke, OT, Memphis Round 7 (No. 225 overall): DeMonte Capehart, DT, Clemson So naturally, none of this will occur. Good chance Bailey is gone before 4. Boston easily could be gone before 35. Rutledge is flying up and likely won't be there at 66. Louis won't be there at 101. Burke is getting enough of a tour to lead me to think he goes 4th or 5th round. Capeheart is too good of an athlete to last that long. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 4 hours ago, OILERMAN said: At 4 the Titans could be in a potential bad spot with a few assumptions Reese and Bailey are both gone, they are not sold on Bain and don't want a RB with the 4th pick in the draft and they don't view Tate as worth the 4th pick. I think Tate is flying under the radar here. I’m not the biggest fan but most of the game now is catch and run/create since the defense is primed to take away the big play anyway. That said , it’s probably a trade down if the two edge rushers . Certainly areas of the roster are still subpar , especially the lines of scrimmage. airmcnair22 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 51 minutes ago, Pragidealist said: I think we're more likely to trade down than up. Would love to see this just to see the tears streaming down Tolar's face.... Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 22 minutes ago, rns90 said: I think Tate is flying under the radar here. I’m not the biggest fan but most of the game now is catch and run/create since the defense is primed to take away the big play anyway. That said , it’s probably a trade down if the two edge rushers . Certainly areas of the roster are still subpar , especially the lines of scrimmage. Flying under the radar here??? Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireInTheHole Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 I can’t believe people think Tate is an option at 2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted April 6 Report Share Posted April 6 Just now, FireInTheHole said: I can’t believe people think Tate is an option at 2. He’s real good at playing football cshumak2, and FireInTheHole 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.