Stevenths78 Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 1 hour ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: Moore has the most sacks allowed (34) and pressures (181) since entering the NFL in 2021 (per The Athletic). TerryBoats, and Lars 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 3 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: That and the fact you didn't just mean actual dollars. It's possible Moore comes into a League of His Own type shit, but no he isn't as good as Lewan. Latham could be as good as Conklin. Let's draw it out Lewan V Moore= Lewan Saffold V Sko= draw at best with massive capital thrown at both but more capital towards Sko Jones V Cush= draw if Cush hits. Way more capital towards Cush. Winner Ben Jones by a mile RG we traded for versus ????= Who knows but probably better then given money or investment Conklin V Latham= I think this one will even out actually. Overall, yes better likely play from a dominant group in 17 with more investment in the current group. Your argument is still pretty shitty though. I think you're underselling some of those guys. Jones had a long track record of being a good C on a team-friendly contract, While Cush is a 1 year wonder who looks like a major overpay at this point. And Latham is the brightest spot on the OL, but Conklin was a top RT at his peak so I don't think that's a given at all. Stevenths78 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 3 minutes ago, IrishTitansFan said: Kinda similar to what I saw. Same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Just now, TerryBoats said: I think you're underselling some of those guys. Jones had a long track record of being a good C on a team-friendly contract, While Cush is a 1 year wonder who looks like a major overpay at this point. And Latham is the brightest spot on the OL, but Conklin was a top RT at his peak so I don't think that's a given at all. I don't think it's a given with Latham it's just what I think as player comps. I believe Latham will be dominant at RT. Lars 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 I said Jones wins by a mile regardless whether Cushenberry hits. No idea what you're talking about there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Is the level of difficulty so much lower that a guy who struggled in pass pro at LT will be elite at RT? Don't they face top edge rushers as well? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTiger3733 Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChosenTitan Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 https://x.com/maxbisHate20/status/1899162117934092631?s=46&t=BXOuo627AXnnsLAwTRGy7g shows some sacks was not on Moore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 I don't want to brag but the Titans are investing big on offensive line again. This time it will work out, I'm sure. Supernope, Callidus, Stevenths78, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleytolar Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 Are these pass-blocking proficiency stats (Pressures and Sacks) on a clock? A QB who holds the ball longer puts pressure on the OL and results in poorer stats. Not sure if this explains Moore's numbers but an indecisive or a gambling QB sure brings pressure to bear on the OL. The game is more complicated and some of these stats might be misleading. And, as someone pointed out, this guy was going up against Garrett and Hendrickson four games a year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrill Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 39 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: It precludes us from doing so with the investment. We have too many holes man. We just closed one. No way 35 isn't used on an immediate hole. We just let Landry walk lol we have Ridley and whom? No safety...etc. I agree but this isn’t a one year rebuild. If we can believe Borgonzi and Brinker, they’ll take a talented guy at a premium position if he’s available. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 I swear to God it seems like they've been trying to fix this dang offensive line since they dumped Munchak and it feels like it's been good for about a year or two total since then. IsntLifeFunny, Stevenths78, Lars, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLinks Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 It’s like a moneyball signing in a way. I can see the Hope for it working out for a while. If this is their tackle solution, I think they could try to get Grey Zabel to play G or C depending on Cushenberry to start the year. Maybe Ersery to play RG. I will say it looks like Latham outperformed Moore last year. Thrill, and DCTitan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevenths78 Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 7 minutes ago, Jamalisms said: I swear to God it seems like they've been trying to fix this dang offensive line since they dumped Munchak and it feels like it's been good for about a year or two total since then. FACTS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TF_Titan Posted March 10 Report Share Posted March 10 2 hours ago, TampaTitan said: The fact this could end up meaning we drafted a RT at 7 overall is fun... I wouldn't be happy about it, but if the end result is we have two solid tackles I won't complain. However, if Moore turns into another Dillard it's a completely different sentiment. DCTitan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.