Jump to content

Cam Ward


JbgTenn

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mythos27 said:

I really don't think we are. Hiding your QB is not an impressive coaching feat. It's something that any coach can do and it has a very short shelf life unless your team is very talented. That's not superior coaching or scheming. Using Willis as an example of Callahan's incompetence doesn't make sense from any angle. The problem with hiding your QB when the rest of the team sucks too is that you'll lose anyways. If you can hide your QB and win, it means you have a pretty talented roster. 

It's also a terrible terrible thing to do with a rebuilding team.  So instead of Ward, we win two more games by hiding teh qb. maybe even 3 and get what?  The Titans have tried to win many times hiding the qb.  We know it can be done- its a bad idea.  Just lose, take the medicine until you can get one. 

 

Now if you're a team where its a back up, temp situation-  go for it.  In that scenario, you're just seeing out the clock until your guy is back.   I have no idea if Callahan could have hidden Wills or Levis as well as Lafluer.  I suspect not bc we dont' have the talent around him but I also don't care.   It's such a horrible strategy when you're trying to rebuild and  you don't have a qb. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I was born and raised in Miami.  Went to every 'Canes game through high school.  Even attended some summer classes on the Gables' campus.  Went to college in Florida and came back to every home game p

I think it's obvious at this point the Titans are taking Ward. I'm on board and think his ceiling is pretty high. Callahan gave an interview to A to Z after the season that was super revealing about t

I'm totally fine with the Titans drafting Ward. Enough people think he can be good and he's shown enough NFL traits. It would not be like the Titans overdrafting Anthony Richardson or Trey Lance. 

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Pragidealist said:

It's also a terrible terrible thing to do with a rebuilding team.  So instead of Ward, we win two more games by hiding teh qb. maybe even 3 and get what?  The Titans have tried to win many times hiding the qb.  We know it can be done- its a bad idea.  Just lose, take the medicine until you can get one. 

 

Now if you're a team where its a back up, temp situation-  go for it.  In that scenario, you're just seeing out the clock until your guy is back.   I have no idea if Callahan could have hidden Wills or Levis as well as Lafluer.  I suspect not bc we dont' have the talent around him but I also don't care.   It's such a horrible strategy when you're trying to rebuild and  you don't have a qb. 

 

 

Exactly correct. GB was in the middle of a playoff run and they knew it. They did a great job keeping Willis on the rails and not asking too much of him. Unfortunately, you can't take approach with a young starter you're trying to groom to be the future. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

I really don't think we are. Hiding your QB is not an impressive coaching feat. It's something that any coach can do and it has a very short shelf life unless your team is very talented. That's not superior coaching or scheming. Using Willis as an example of Callahan's incompetence doesn't make sense from any angle. The problem with hiding your QB when the rest of the team sucks too is that you'll lose anyways. If you can hide your QB and win, it means you have a pretty talented roster. That's why GB was able to hide Willis and win while we struggled to hide Levis. 

Green Bay was #4 in EPA per dropback in Willis's two starts - they even outperformed their EPA on the season with Love starting .  

 

Tennessee was dead last in EPA in 2022 with Willis starting.  Including an abysmal -.73 EPA per dropback in the win against a horrible Houston team.  

 

As you see, there are degrees to how much you can hide a bad QB.  You can win in spite of them, or they can be a positive contributor to your success, as Willis was in GB.

 

47 minutes ago, Pragidealist said:

It's also a terrible terrible thing to do with a rebuilding team.  So instead of Ward, we win two more games by hiding teh qb. maybe even 3 and get what?  The Titans have tried to win many times hiding the qb.  We know it can be done- its a bad idea.  Just lose, take the medicine until you can get one. 

 

Now if you're a team where its a back up, temp situation-  go for it.  In that scenario, you're just seeing out the clock until your guy is back.   I have no idea if Callahan could have hidden Wills or Levis as well as Lafluer.  I suspect not bc we dont' have the talent around him but I also don't care.   It's such a horrible strategy when you're trying to rebuild and  you don't have a qb. 

 

 

I'll always be thankful to Callahan for getting us the Ward pick.  Because you're right - SB is a fantasy without the QB.

 

But the thing about coaches who can make good gameplans for bad QBs - they can do the same for good QBs.   Nobody throws to more open receivers than Mahomes.  He averaged under 6 air yards per attempt in his last two SB victories - not much different than what Reid would ask of Alex Smith. And as we can see in Cincinnati and Buffalo, that's a much more successful strategy than putting everything on the shoulders of the QB. 

 

We suck, and that's not on Callahan.  But when this roster improved, we'll need to have a coach who can even the playing field.  And I'm seeing someone in Callahan who is just going up constantly be outcoached on the biggest stage, just like Buffalo has been.

Edited by TerryBoats
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TerryBoats said:

Green Bay was #4 in EPA per dropback in Willis's two starts - they even outperformed their EPA on the season with Love starting .  

 

Tennessee was dead last in EPA in 2022 with Willis starting.  Including an abysmal -.73 EPA per dropback in the win against a horrible Houston team.  

 

As you see, there are degrees to how much you can hide a bad QB.  You can win in spite of them, or they can be a positive contributor to your success, as Willis was in GB.

 

I'll always be thankful to Callahan for getting us the Ward pick.  Because you're right - SB is a fantasy without the QB.

 

But the thing about coaches who can make good gameplans for bad QBs - they can do the same for good QBs.   Nobody throws to more open receivers than Mahomes.  He averaged under 6 air yards per attempt in his last two SB victories - not much different than what Reid would ask of Alex Smith. And as we can see in Cincinnati and Buffalo, that's a much more successful strategy than putting everything on the shoulders of the QB.  If we want to compete with that, we'll need to have a coach who can even the playing field.  

 

 

not really-  wait until you see how many "open wr's" the titans suddenly have with ward.  QB is everything in the nfl.     

 

Horses win races-  

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TerryBoats said:

Green Bay was #4 in EPA per dropback in Willis's two starts - they even outperformed their EPA on the season with Love starting .  

 

Tennessee was dead last in EPA in 2022 with Willis starting.  Including an abysmal -.73 EPA per dropback in the win against a horrible Houston team.  

 

As you see, there are degrees to how much you can hide a bad QB.  You can win in spite of them, or they can be a positive contributor to your success, as Willis was in GB.

 

I'll always be thankful to Callahan for getting us the Ward pick.  Because you're right - SB is a fantasy without the QB.

 

But the thing about coaches who can make good gameplans for bad QBs - they can do the same for good QBs.   Nobody throws to more open receivers than Mahomes.  He averaged under 6 air yards per attempt in his last two SB victories - he was essentially a game manager. And as we can see in Cincinnati and Buffalo, that's a much more successful strategy than putting everything on the shoulders of the QB.  If we want to compete with that, we'll need to have a coach who can even the playing field.  

 

 

Once again; this is all easily explained by Willis having better players around him in GB. You just can't get around that. The degree to which you can hide that QB is directly determined by how good the rest of your team is. Had Willis gone to say the Saints or Patriots and done well, you'd have a point because those rosters sucked too. But that's not what happened. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

I really don't think we are. Hiding your QB is not an impressive coaching feat. It's something that any coach can do and it has a very short shelf life unless your team is very talented. That's not superior coaching or scheming. Using Willis as an example of Callahan's incompetence doesn't make sense from any angle. The problem with hiding your QB when the rest of the team sucks too is that you'll lose anyways. If you can hide your QB and win, it means you have a pretty talented roster. That's why GB was able to hide Willis and win while we struggled to hide Levis. 

It also makes no sense since Callahan literally never coached Willis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, scine09 said:

It also makes no sense since Callahan literally never coached Willis.

Yes, but he's trying to make the argument that better coaching got more out of a player that we've all agreed is worse than Levis. The argument just fails because he can't account for a variable that everyone agrees is more impactful. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, rns90 said:

You guys are wasting your time on this one.  Once Terry gets his tunnel vision onto something he ain’t giving up no matter how stupid he sounds (see Smith, Arthur and Robinson, Jon as prime examples).

Was he also the Taywan Taylor guy or am I thinking of someone else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

Was he also the Taywan Taylor guy or am I thinking of someone else?

Matt LaFluer's brilliant coaching gave me a false impression of Taylor, as he posted great separation numbers despite being unable to even run a route correctly.  Davis also averaged the best separation of his career as his WR2, despite barely being passable for a WR2 during most of it.  LaFluer really does work miracles!

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TerryBoats said:

Matt LaFluer's brilliant coaching gave me a false impression of Taylor, as he posted great separation numbers despite being unable to even run a route correctly.  Davis also averaged the best separation of his career as his WR2, despite barely being passable for a WR2 during most of it.  LaFluer really does work miracles!

Listen, I have no intent on arguing against Matt Lafleur. He is a great coach and he did scheme those guys open a bunch. Corey couldn't stay healthy and Taylor had bricks for hands. Mariota was too scared to throw the damn ball. Just more evidence that coaching can't cover up shit play for very long. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LaFleur also fell into a great situation which enabled him to grow as a head coach.  I don't think he'd have had the success that Vrabel had with the Titans.  Mainly because I don't think he was ready.  He took over a Green Bay team with a motivated Aaron Rodgers still in his prime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Willis was always a 3-4 year project before he was even supposed to see the field. He's not a good player nor has he ever been. His floor was so low that of course after 3 years he looked less incompetent. 

 

This has zero to do with LaFleur coaching him up. But putting him a decent spot to produce is a credit to LaFleur. 

 

The argument could easily be made that Callahan is the one that improved Willis. Since BC had Willis in the spring and for part of camp . He was gone for a couple of weeks and then he's magically not terrible? No. 

 

This is also a bigger indictment on Vrabel than anyone. 

 

 

That said, I don't expect Terry to follow anything other than short term answers. He's blind to long term effects of basically anything. You can see that in his political responses.

Edited by titanruss
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...