TitansFan777 Posted March 29 Report Share Posted March 29 1 hour ago, Starkiller said: The fact that Comer wins reelection at a 75% clip really reminds me how dumb the south is MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No1TitansFan Posted March 29 Report Share Posted March 29 (edited) 20 hours ago, LongTimeFan said: "Media organization have identified" STFU Yeah, they have all the information. The government has refused to release any info based on phony security issues using a law specifically meant for emergency war powers from the 18th century that has already been stayed due its lack of constitutional authority. How a conservative can support rounding up people off the street and being shipped out of country with zero legal review is beyond me. I thought you didn't support big government operating with zero restraint. Edited March 29 by No1TitansFan IsntLifeFunny, Smokes, and Jamalisms 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rogue Posted March 30 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 30 13 hours ago, No1TitansFan said: The government has refused to release any info based on phony security issues using a law specifically meant for emergency war powers from the 18th century that has already been stayed due its lack of constitutional authority. How a conservative can support rounding up people off the street and being shipped out of country with zero legal review is beyond me. I thought you didn't support big government operating with zero restraint. They’re not conservative. IsntLifeFunny, Smokes, MadMax, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted March 31 Report Share Posted March 31 20 hours ago, Rogue said: They’re not conservative. For decades and decades, conservative republicans supported free trade and NATO. Now under Trump, the opposite. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Titans279 Posted March 31 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 31 Starkiller, pat, ChemEngr79, and 3 others 5 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted April 1 Report Share Posted April 1 Almost half of Republicans don't think we should be a republic anymore. @LongTimeFan what say you? "I wouldn't believe em unless I saw them, but [these numbers are] here loud and clear"... A large minority (44%) are against the idea of judges even being able to review Trump's policies. A majority (59%) of Republicans are good with impeaching judges who rule against Trump. https://x.com/ForecasterEnten/status/1907138469228372132 MadMax, OILERMAN, and IsntLifeFunny 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted April 1 Report Share Posted April 1 35 minutes ago, Titans279 said: Almost half of Republicans don't think we should be a republic anymore. @LongTimeFan what say you? "I wouldn't believe em unless I saw them, but [these numbers are] here loud and clear"... A large minority (44%) are against the idea of judges even being able to review Trump's policies. A majority (59%) of Republicans are good with impeaching judges who rule against Trump. https://x.com/ForecasterEnten/status/1907138469228372132 No, no, no… Republicans aren’t in favor of ending the republic. They just want to keep the other side from being able to vote or have any say in how the government is run… Mythos27 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeFan Posted April 1 Report Share Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Titans279 said: Almost half of Republicans don't think we should be a republic anymore. @LongTimeFan what say you? "I wouldn't believe em unless I saw them, but [these numbers are] here loud and clear"... A large minority (44%) are against the idea of judges even being able to review Trump's policies. A majority (59%) of Republicans are good with impeaching judges who rule against Trump. https://x.com/ForecasterEnten/status/1907138469228372132 Reluctantly, i will play. wanting judicial overreach and not being a republic anymore is a big stretch. IMO, a better solution would be if the judge's order is overturned, that judge should not be allowed another challenge during that presidents tenure. Or some other restriction like it only applies in that judges jurisdiction, not the entire country. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted April 2 Report Share Posted April 2 (edited) 1 hour ago, LongTimeFan said: Reluctantly, i will play. wanting judicial overreach and not being a republic anymore is a big stretch. IMO, a better solution would be if the judge's order is overturned, that judge should not be allowed another challenge during that presidents tenure. Or some other restriction like it only applies in that judges jurisdiction, not the entire country. If Trump’s policies are above judicial review (which 44% of Republicans believe he should be) we definitely are no longer a republic anymore. It’s weird to me that you want to live under an authoritarian dictatorship. You honestly think a Democratic president should not be able to be stopped by courts? Edited April 2 by Titans279 IsntLifeFunny, MadMax, Smokes, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strunk'sDessert Posted April 2 Report Share Posted April 2 When the shoe is on the other foot, it's always a different story. Mythos27, pat, and Little Earl 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jamalisms Posted April 2 Popular Post Report Share Posted April 2 Biden wants to forgive loans? Thank God the judiciary stood up to the tyrant. Trump wants to send people to a foreign gulag with no due process and despite court order not to? Judicial overreach to question that. pat, MadMax, Mythos27, and 3 others 4 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted April 2 Report Share Posted April 2 Republicans have spent a couple of decades attacking any decision from the bench they didn’t agree with “judicial activism”. Meanwhile their judges are inventing presidential immunity, making unlimited political contributions freedom of speech, overturning 50 year old legal precedent on abortion rights, etc. pat, MadMax, and IsntLifeFunny 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeFan Posted April 2 Report Share Posted April 2 3 hours ago, Titans279 said: If Trump’s policies are above judicial review (which 44% of Republicans believe he should be) we definitely are no longer a republic anymore. It’s weird to me that you want to live under an authoritarian dictatorship. You honestly think a Democratic president should not be able to be stopped by courts? Again, you take things to extremes and that is usually why I hesitate to respond to the posters here. Your sides use of nazis and racists and authoritarian mumbo jumbo is old and tired. It doesn't resonate with anyone you want to have a civil conversation with. If a GOP leaning judge does the same thing to a Dem president, same rules. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted April 2 Report Share Posted April 2 2 hours ago, Starkiller said: Republicans have spent a couple of decades attacking any decision from the bench they didn’t agree with “judicial activism”. Meanwhile their judges are inventing presidential immunity, making unlimited political contributions freedom of speech, overturning 50 year old legal precedent on abortion rights, etc. ... refusing to allow a pretty cut and dry classified documents case to even move forward. But that's almost less a problem than the prosecutor and others slow playing justice and not objecting more vociferously. One historically corrupt judicial maneuver is only a problem if they let it be. And they very much did. Cannon will forever be a trivial bit of historical trivia and an example of purest judicial malfeasance. Complacency was the real problem. Still is. IsntLifeFunny, and MadMax 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted April 2 Report Share Posted April 2 1 hour ago, LongTimeFan said: Again, you take things to extremes and that is usually why I hesitate to respond to the posters here. Your sides use of nazis and racists and authoritarian mumbo jumbo is old and tired. It doesn't resonate with anyone you want to have a civil conversation with. If a GOP leaning judge does the same thing to a Dem president, same rules. The thing is this is not hyperbole to say that if "A large minority (44%) are against the idea of judges even being able to review Trump's policies" that those people want to live in a different form of government than we are supposed to have. If you want a President that doesn't answer to the judicial branch you're talking about a king, not a President. I'm not being uncivil at all. You just don't want to actually grapple with what you're in bed with. ChemEngr79, OILERMAN, IsntLifeFunny, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.