Jump to content

Titans sign Tyler Boyd to a 1yr up to $4.5 million deal


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Starkiller said:

I’d rather risk Burks being a wasted roster spot than seeing him go elsewhere for nothing and turn into at least a competent, productive WR that we just threw away. 

 

They have Hopkins and Ridley starting and multiple options in the slot. He's not doing anything here worthy of getting an extension. Trade him for whatever you can get and let him have a chance to do something w/ his career w/ someone else. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 598
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

11 personnel here we come

I’m not at Liberty to say…

The idea that Boyd, a 29 year old WR who put up over 600 yards as the #3 WR in an offense led by Jake Browning last year is some garbage WR the likes of NWI is hilarious. Boyd has produced 300 first d

Posted Images

They just said on the radio that we are still 4th in the league for cap space... I dont think thats accurate as rookies and Boyd arent accounted for (rookies arent accounted anywhere) But if you just subtact the max value of this contract, Titans are still like 8th with 26.5 mil left. Might get a couple more mil for us depending on the actual wording of the contract.

 

There's plenty of room to make more moves without needing to trade anyone away.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, reo said:

 

They have Hopkins and Ridley starting and multiple options in the slot. He's not doing anything here worthy of getting an extension. Trade him for whatever you can get and let him have a chance to do something w/ his career w/ someone else. 

If he turns things around this year he will still get plenty of snaps as a top 4 WR. And put him in position to increase his workload in 2025 with Hopkins, Boyd, and NWI all gone. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, reo said:

 

Roster spot and a 6th is better than nothing if he's at best 3rd in line to get any playing time in the slot.

 

 

Why do you think he's at best 3rd to get slot time? I dont think that is set yet. He's also directly competing with NWI to back up the other two spots or possibly be than main backup for all 3.

 

Burkes and phillips would also have some different slot responsibilites. Big slot vs small slot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, titanruss said:

 

Why do you think he's at best 3rd to get slot time?

 

Which is why i said if he's the 3rd in line in the slot.

 

3 minutes ago, titanruss said:

Burkes and phillips would also have some different slot responsibilites. Big slot vs small slot.

 

 

If he's splitting time as the 3rd WR... trade him.

Edited by reo
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

Also, who are we saving that extra roster spot for? Mason Kinsey? TreShawn Harrison? The UDFA from Youngstown State?

 

I haven't looked at the depth chart that closely but at WR we currently have

 

1) Hopkins

2) Ridley

3) Boyd

4) Phillips

5) Jackson

6) NWI

7) Burks

 

Traditionally keeping 7 WRs isn't easy as you have to make compromises at other positions.

Edited by reo
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, reo said:

 

I haven't looked at the depth chart that closely but at WR we currently have

 

1) Hopkins

2) Ridley

3) Boyd

4) Phillips

5) Jackson

6) NWI

7) Burks

 

Traditionally keeping 7 WRs isn't easy as you have to make compromises at other positions.

It’s normal for the Bengals. They play a whole lot more 3+ WR sets than Vrabel's Titans ever did. I’d assume we can expect the same. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, reo said:

 

I haven't looked at the depth chart that closely but at WR we currently have

 

1) Hopkins

2) Ridley

3) Boyd

4) Phillips

5) Jackson

6) NWI

 

Traditionally keeping 7 WRs isn't easy as you have to make compromises at other positions.

3 tight ends, and 3 running backs, 3 qb's, 9 olinemen leaves 7 receivers.. if they go with 10 olinemen, then 6 receivers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Nash said:

3 tight ends, and 3 running backs, 3 qb's, 9 olinemen leaves 7 receivers.. if they go with 10 olinemen, then 6 receivers

2 QBs is likely. Probably 10 OL because they are now more valuable on kickoff returns. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

It’s normal for the Bengals. They play a whole lot more 3+ WR sets than Vrabel's Titans ever did. I’d assume we can expect the same. 

 

They had 6 WRs listed in Sept last year

 

https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/archive/275/CIN

 

And 6 WRs listed in Sept the year before

 

https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/archive/262/CIN

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...