rns90 Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 1 hour ago, TF_Titan said: The Titans still don't have a true #1 WR or a true #1 edge. They also have a top 5 draft pick to potentially fill one of those needs. Waiting until next year means likely trying to fill one with a pick more likely to be in the 10-15 range than the top 5 pick they currently hold. I have no idea if they project any of the top edge or wr prospects capable of filling one of those needs, but if they do they'd be negligent if they didn't consider them strongly at #4 regardless of who else they currently have on the roster. Those positions also cost money especially if you add LT into the fray as well. And that’s where the entire “positional value” argument takes place particularly when you are picking at 4 . 1 hour ago, Callidus said: Combine that with this is a good wr and edge class makes it beneficial to go wr then edge or edge wr at 4 and 35. I’m trying to figure out which one is more optimal combo with regards to this class. I’d probably lean towards edge first then WR in round 2 but you could easily flip flop them . Also seems like the edges in round 2 have more issues (arm length, less than stellar testing numbers). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 I like the idea of loading up on TE this yr over WR. I love Stowers at TE but I think 35 might be rich but the dude is going to be the best TE in this class. prometheus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 24 minutes ago, rns90 said: Those positions also cost money especially if you add LT into the fray as well. And that’s where the entire “positional value” argument takes place particularly when you are picking at 4 . I’m trying to figure out which one is more optimal combo with regards to this class. I’d probably lean towards edge first then WR in round 2 but you could easily flip flop them . Also seems like the edges in round 2 have more issues (arm length, less than stellar testing numbers). Lawrence and young are the only 2 i really like. Both have good size and production. Lawrence tested like crazy. Young had much better tape against the run though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 (edited) moved. Edited March 28 by Number9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TF_Titan Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 2 hours ago, rns90 said: I’d probably lean towards edge first then WR in round 2 but you could easily flip flop them . Also seems like the edges in round 2 have more issues (arm length, less than stellar testing numbers). I think generally speaking you're more likely to hit on a stud WR in round 2...or maybe even 3 if you get lucky...than you are a stud edge. Especially with how this class looks. If Bailey is there at 4 I think you run to the podium. If he's not then I think it gets interesting. If you think Tate is a solid #1 (maybe not Malik Nabors, but a top 15 type of guy) then I think he'd be hard to pass up. If not, Love is not a bad option either. Reese I'm not sure about. I'd probably take him over Bain (who I wouldn't touch at #4), but he's kind of an unknown with so few reps at edge. rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
prometheus Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 2 hours ago, Bongo59 said: I like the idea of loading up on TE this yr over WR. I love Stowers at TE but I think 35 might be rich but the dude is going to be the best TE in this class. I watched every Vanderbilt game last year and was super impressed with TE Stowers. He has a knack for getting open in mud-field. He knows how to use his body and catches everything anywhere close to him. I don't see him in many mocks so far, and will be a major addition to any team drafting him. japan, Face, Justafan, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 8 minutes ago, prometheus said: I watched every Vanderbilt game last year and was super impressed with TE Stowers. He has a knack for getting open in mud-field. He knows how to use his body and catches everything anywhere close to him. I don't see him in many mocks so far, and will be a major addition to any team drafting him. I feel like this could be a great draft for TEs. You have: Stowers Endries Sadiq Roush Kitselman My two favorites are Endries and Kitselman (who might be UDFA). I know Kitselman doesn't have the production (and some dropsies), but I watched a lot of Vols games and that dude reminds me of Kelce. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TeamRamrod Posted March 28 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 28 I keep saying it but they should find the LT of the future THIS year. OILERMAN, Starkiller, Number9, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 45 minutes ago, TF_Titan said: I think generally speaking you're more likely to hit on a stud WR in round 2...or maybe even 3 if you get lucky...than you are a stud edge. Especially with how this class looks. If Bailey is there at 4 I think you run to the podium. If he's not then I think it gets interesting. If you think Tate is a solid #1 (maybe not Malik Nabors, but a top 15 type of guy) then I think he'd be hard to pass up. If not, Love is not a bad option either. Reese I'm not sure about. I'd probably take him over Bain (who I wouldn't touch at #4), but he's kind of an unknown with so few reps at edge. Its a strange year for the WR vs edge debate. Most of the time I would 100% agree you take the edge and grab a wr in the 2nd round. The thing that makes this draft strange is there are no clear holy crap edge or wr candidates(Tackle either for the matter). Yes, as much as I love tate and think he is absolutely worth a top 10 pick and would run to podium he is no megatron must have him guy. Between bailey being stiff, bain's baby arms and reese being mostly projection you have some stuff you have to worry about. Wr and edge are both very deep this year though, to the point some first round talents should slip to the top of the 2nd. These are not guranteed game changers but should be plug and play with good+ upside. I think it is safe to say whichever way you go in round one there will be someone worth picking from the other postion. Number9 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 20 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said: I keep saying it but they should find the LT of the future THIS year. I still really like caleb tiernan, he has short arms and absolutely bombed his 3 cone at his proday but the dude is huge and moves really well on tape. If they can get him in the 4th that would be fantastic. He likely goes in the 3rd and does well for someone like my guy Rosengarten did(fucking ravens). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted March 29 Report Share Posted March 29 44 minutes ago, Callidus said: I think it is safe to say whichever way you go in round one there will be someone worth picking from the other postion. ...except for Love, right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 29 Report Share Posted March 29 2 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: ...except for Love, right? ya, I was speaking directly to the wr/edge at 4 and 35 back to back idea. You can't get both in the first two rounds if you dont draft both lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted March 29 Report Share Posted March 29 4 hours ago, Callidus said: Lawrence and young are the only 2 i really like. Both have good size and production. Lawrence tested like crazy. Young had much better tape against the run though. I came away unimpressed with Young. It was kind of meh. One guy I liked but not at 35 as a DPR/wide 9 fit was Derrick Moore out of Michigan. He’s strictly an outside guy but he consistently got pressure off the edge. I think he’s supposed to go in early 3rd round. Starkiller, and Face 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 29 Report Share Posted March 29 37 minutes ago, rns90 said: I came away unimpressed with Young. It was kind of meh. One guy I liked but not at 35 as a DPR/wide 9 fit was Derrick Moore out of Michigan. He’s strictly an outside guy but he consistently got pressure off the edge. I think he’s supposed to go in early 3rd round. The thing with zion is he is more suited for the edge spot we have filled already. Lawrence is by far and away my guy for 35. I am intrigued by the idea of a pair of good edge setters and just trying to collapes the pocket with pure violence from all 4 linemen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted March 29 Report Share Posted March 29 46 minutes ago, rns90 said: I came away unimpressed with Young. It was kind of meh. One guy I liked but not at 35 as a DPR/wide 9 fit was Derrick Moore out of Michigan. He’s strictly an outside guy but he consistently got pressure off the edge. I think he’s supposed to go in early 3rd round. Starkiller, and Omar 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.