Jump to content

Titans Offseason Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No idea where this nugget fits so thought it might worth starting a thread for all Titans non HC offseason discussion.   This was meant to happen last offseason but Sweat never showed up so

Who will we draft? The answer has been there the whole time.     

That’s a lot of hooch 

Posted Images

The bottom line is Ward improved noticeably down the stretch and when your QB plays well you're going to win some games. I'd rather see that at the cost of draft position than see him shit the bed guaranteeing a higher pick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TF_Titan said:

The bottom line is Ward improved noticeably down the stretch and when your QB plays well you're going to win some games. I'd rather see that at the cost of draft position than see him shit the bed guaranteeing a higher pick.

It doesn't have to be an either or. He/they looked good against Seattle but lost the game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Callidus said:

It doesn't have to be an either or. He/they looked good against Seattle but lost the game. 

 

Obviously you can lose games where the QB plays well, but over time if your QB is playing well you're going to win some games...especially against bad teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/4/2026 at 5:00 PM, begooode said:

 

Last year's excitement was 100% to see if Cam was/is legit, the future. Secondarily, to see if the new GM's draft was indicative of someone who knows wtf he's doing and hoping the guy can build a team. This year it still is Cam in his second year given the importance of the position, but I think the real Tell-Me-Something-Good (praise be to Chaka Khan) needs to come from Saleh and the new staff of tenured coaches.  Outside of Fassel, the difference in experience between last year's crew and this year's staff is night and day.  I'm just hoping to see that translate on the field.

This year is ALL about progress for the unit he drafted last year and the rise of 2 FA classes. The new rookies are really irrelevant to this year's success. Maybe one of them will have an impact from the draft class. If it's like last year, maybe 2. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SleepingTitan said:

This year is ALL about progress for the unit he drafted last year and the rise of 2 FA classes. The new rookies are really irrelevant to this year's success. Maybe one of them will have an impact from the draft class. If it's like last year, maybe 2. 

Idk. With two first round picks and a guy who was expected to go at the top of the 2nd all likely, starting. If only 1 showed much as a rookie that would be really disappointing. 

 

Unless its tate, then I get to do my I told you so victory lap to console myself. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

Drops always seem to coincide with inaccurate throws, poor pass protection and just overall disjointed passing games. Sure receivers also just flat out drop the balls at times but when drops are used to defend QB play it's usually not that simple. When the receiver is schemed open, gets accurate ball placement the passes are caught way more consistently. 


maybe I'm a homer but I dunno man... felt different this past year than excuse making for other QBs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, titanruss said:


maybe I'm a homer but I dunno man... felt different this past year than excuse making for other QBs. 

 

The Titans WRs and pass protection was horrible this past season. I was speaking more broadly than Titan specific. At the same time Ward played pretty bad at times himself. He improved but he's far from a finished product. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the Athletic Shot discussing how bad the Titans WRs were(Ayomanor, they also slipped in how bad Moore was. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

The top 3 played on the same line in their prime

 

 

 

I have a football card of Childress that says something akin to, "nothing is certain in this life except for death, taxes, and Ray Childress leading the team in sacks."

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Callidus said:

Idk. With two first round picks and a guy who was expected to go at the top of the 2nd all likely, starting. If only 1 showed much as a rookie that would be really disappointing. 

 

Unless its tate, then I get to do my I told you so victory lap to console myself. 

I think Tate has a good year "for a rookie" but don't get you hopes up. Rookies rarely pan out first year. So rare. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SleepingTitan said:

I think Tate has a good year "for a rookie" but don't get you hopes up. Rookies rarely pan out first year. So rare. 

Faulk will heavily rotate, as will all the DL, so he probably won't put up big numbers.

 

Hill will start and make a lot of plays.

Edited by ctm
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ctm said:

Faulk will heavily rotate, as will all the DL, so he probably won't put up big numbers.

 

Hill will start and make a lot of plays.

You never know with the DL rotation. I think it will depend more on the useage when on the field than the actual snap count. 

 

Thats for everyone in the group not just faulk. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...