TeamRamrod Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 Titans not mentioned for Linderbaum. We McGovern boys. headhunter, and tgo 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 1 minute ago, TeamRamrod said: Titans not mentioned for Linderbaum. We McGovern boys. Its a source off between Breer and PK. Breer hasn't listed the Titans in either the Pierce or Linderbaum where as PK thinks the Titans will be heavily in both sweepstakes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 8 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: A couple of weeks ago I saw a stat that Wan'Dale Robinson ranked really highly in receiving yards from broken/off script plays which would pair well with Ward's ability to create something from nothing. Robinson would seemingly have a good awareness of positioning himself to make a play when the QB is in trouble. Yeah , a lot of our WRs weren’t good at this when Ward was scrambling and going off script. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 (edited) 15 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said: Your hypothetical should be more “put Gibbs on the Raiders” and tell me RB isnt important. Put Gibbs on virtually any team in the NFL and they are instantly better. I understand where you're going (I think) but I also think it misses the point. Edited March 6 by Justafan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 3 minutes ago, Justafan said: Put Gibbs on virtually any team in the NFL and they are instantly better. I understand where you're going (I think) but I also think it misses the point. Better? Of course. But that’s not how the Lions were built. The Lions built their team through the trenches first for YEARS and then added in Gibbs as one of the final pieces. Even Gibbs was splitting time with Montgomery his first two years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 1 minute ago, TeamRamrod said: Better? Of course. But that’s not how the Lions were built. The Lions built their team through the trenches first for YEARS and then added in Gibbs as one of the final pieces. Even Gibbs was splitting time with Montgomery his first two years. So the raiders should pass on Gibbs because they don't have the entire offensive line set? That's retarded, of course you take Gibbs and watch the offensive line instantly look better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nash Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 If Arizona trades out or takes Love, Bailey is likely the pick.. Justafan, and airmcnair22 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 3 minutes ago, Justafan said: So the raiders should pass on Gibbs because they don't have the entire offensive line set? That's retarded, of course you take Gibbs and watch the offensive line instantly look better. Who’s gonna tell him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 3 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said: Who’s gonna tell him? Apparently, not you. CreepingDeath 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 14 minutes ago, Justafan said: That's retarded, of course you take Gibbs and watch the offensive line instantly look better. RB are line dependent. Even Henry looked subpar the last two years here. RB’s don’t make lines better it’s the other way around and always has been. Pollard looked better when the line finally gelled and were opening up massive holes for him. DCTitan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 1 minute ago, rns90 said: RB are line dependent. Even Henry looked subpar the last two years here. RB’s don’t make lines better it’s the other way around and always has been. Pollard looked better when the line finally gelled and were opening up massive holes for him. They are co-dependent. We've seen it time and time again. Yes, RBs benefit from a great offensive line. Yes, offensive lines benefit from a great RB. This is why most RBs are not that important... because you can get virtually the same production from 10 different guys behind a decent offensive line. Elite RBs belong in their own category however, and to pretend like Gibbs is only productive because he plays behind a great offensive line is a misguided, at best, argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 Are the Lions better with or without Gibbs? Are the 49ers better with or without McCaffrey? Are the Saints better with or without Kamara? Teams can win without elite, multi-dimensional RBs. But there’s no doubt that elite RBs make their teams better. Justafan, Hyperion, CreepingDeath, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Justafan Posted March 6 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 6 This argument is like saying don't draft a QB until you have two tackles and a dominant WR in place. Then someone would make the argument that you don't draft the WR until you have the QB in place. Just take the guy who will move the needle the most and stop overthinking it. Starkiller, BeedoeLaw, tgo, and 3 others 5 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 Just now, Justafan said: This argument is like saying don't draft a QB until you have two tackles and a dominant WR in place. It’s not at all japan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 2 minutes ago, Starkiller said: Are the Lions better with or without Gibbs? Are the 49ers better with or without McCaffrey? Are the Saints better with or without Kamara? Teams can win without elite, multi-dimensional RBs. But there’s no doubt that elite RBs make their teams better. Exactly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.