Jump to content

Charlie Kirk shot UPDATE: Confirmed Dead


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, KenAmato58 said:


 

Man this guy was such a bitch. He advocated for the rape of women. Good riddance. We should make a video game killing him! Looks like he had a smashing good time. Derp derp. Amirite my fellow democrats? Did I do it right?

If you truly feel that what 9 nines posted was wrong and offensive then why do it yourself other than to lash out? You think you two are on the same level? I didn't think that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

like I said in the other thread, this is not good for america but miss me with the right wing outrage already permeating across social media. They made fun of Pelosi's husband being attacked and didn'

These people have no empathy when kids are shot in schools, Trump cracks jokes when McCain dies/Military service, Trump made fun of Sen. Dingell after he died, "I said, 'That's OK, don't worry about i

Take the L motherfuckers    

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

A lot of us have put him on ignore because he’s a piece of shit

I didn't realize that was his jam but I'll be following suit. I have a very small ignore list so I've got plenty of room.

Edited by Mythos27
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

Snowflake reaction in real time

 

 

Just think about what types of people are big fans of a racist, sexist, pro-violence influencer like Kirk. His fans wouldn’t be fans if they weren’t also racist, sexist and pro-violence.
 

When people defend him you can just assume they are bad people. Maybe they are just a sucker who fell prey to the propaganda, but supporting a racist is enough to label you a racist. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

From what I've seen the guy had no registered political affiliation. So far it's like I thought, this has little to do with actual politics and a lot to do with guns being so readily available that absolute psychos have easy access to them. 

But if the players wouldn’t shoot people they wouldn’t make the make gun access look so bad!

 

Im just trolling but glad we think the same way for shit that’s actually important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Stan said:

Kirk got killed for speaking out against isreal. The only thing I agreed with him.. these crazy maga lunatics took him out 

There are plenty of antisemite conservatives who hate Trump and other MAGA-types for supporting Israel. I doubt that’s why Kirk was killed. 

Edited by Starkiller
Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

So we have the literal president of the United States stoking anger against the "radical left". Let's both be real, he wants political retribution against all leftists for this since it's his MO with everything. We have prominent conservative figures like Elon, Bannon, and Jesse Waters saying they are at war. There are exactly 0 prominent figures on the left calling for more violence. You can't point me to a single person denouncing any of this speech (because no one prominent is) and I'm supposed to pretend not only that I don't see any of it but that conservatives are actually calling for a lowering of the temperature. Are you serious?

 

Republicans aren't emotional idiots? All republicans aren't emotional idiots but  January 6th is a good example that many are. The emotional moment you're all having right now with many lashing out on democrats/leftists that had nothing to do with Kirk's death is another good example. The fact that you can't agree that these are both moments where emotions are getting the best of people on your side is nuts but I can't make you see it. Read this article from the Guardian. This is what we're seeing on our end. Now do you personally have a problem this or don't you? 

 

 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-shooting-death-trump-reaction

You have got to be kidding me. Your interpretation of what others say shows your inherent bias.

 

Earlier you said 'no one' and then backpeddled to say 'oh no, I meant no one of political importance'. So do you think all these people that said 'at war' meant killing. You can find plenty of lefties saying the same thing over the last 8 years.

 

So spare me your bullshit. You can Google what you want to see and ignore the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Stan said:

Kirk got killed for speaking out against isreal. The only thing I agreed with him.. these crazy maga lunatics took him out 

I find that hard to believe. Surely there are people who have spoken out more strongly against Israel than Kirk. Last I heard, he was about to have a conversation with Saagar Enjiti from breaking points so that Saagar could help him see the case against supporting Israel. Sounds to me like he was ideologically on the side of Israel but was getting enough push-back from his young base to re-consider and was kind of on the fence. A rational assassin doesn't kill someone for that.

 

My guess is that this is a case of obssesive fixation from someone in already in a pretty fucked up mental space. My GUESS is that the killer leans right or at least watches a good bit of right-wing content because what self-respecting leftist watches enough Charlie Kirk to think about him during their daily life. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oldschool said:

We know who will pretend the data is fake because thats what they do but if you look this up yourself using reputable sources, Its the same picture over and over again. Obviously there are bat shit crazy people on the left but this idea its the left that resorts to violence and poor conservatives just want to debate and exchange ideas is pure fantasy.

 

 

1. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

CSIS tracks domestic terrorism incidents.

In their 2020–2023 reports, they found that right-wing extremists were responsible for the majority of terrorist plots and attacks in the U.S., compared to left-wing, anarchist, or single-issue extremists.

In 2022, for example, CSIS recorded that two-thirds of all attacks/plots were linked to right-wing actors.

 

2. Anti-Defamation League (ADL) — Center on Extremism

ADL data on extremist killings shows that between 2012 and 2022, right-wing extremists were responsible for 74% of extremist-related murders in the U.S.

Left-wing or anarchist violence accounted for a small minority (around 4%).

The rest were Islamist extremists or cases without a clear ideology.

 

3. FBI & DHS assessments

Both agencies, in threat assessments since 2020, have warned that domestic violent extremists (DVEs), especially white supremacists and anti-government militia types, pose the greatest terrorist threat to the U.S. homeland.

The FBI has repeatedly testified to Congress that racially/ethnically motivated violent extremists (RMVEs), primarily white supremacists, are at the top of the threat list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

You have got to be kidding me. Your interpretation of what others say shows your inherent bias.

 

Earlier you said 'no one' and then backpeddled to say 'oh no, I meant no one of political importance'. So do you think all these people that said 'at war' meant killing. You can find plenty of lefties saying the same thing over the last 8 years.

 

So spare me your bullshit. You can Google what you want to see and ignore the rest.

Good lord. I did not think that I had to clarify that no one meant people that matter and I would actually hear from. In this very thread while talking to maybe Titandan, I made it pretty clear the opinions of randos in comment sections don't mean shit to me. Maybe you saw me say that and are conveniently ignoring it or maybe you didn't see it. Either way, I clarified and rather than take it as a clarification, you're portraying it as a  backpedal. I gave you very clear, examples of how people that matter on either side are talking about this issue and because you can't deny that I am correct, you're choosing to paint me as dishonest or disingenuous.

 

The conversation is about bringing down the temperature in this moment. I have not denied that people on the left have engaged in that rhetoric. What I'm disputing is your claim that there are prominent people on the right calling for peace, calm, and pulling back on on that type of rhetoric right now. I've showed you clear examples of the exact opposite of that and you have provided 0 examples that support your claim. I'm not attacking you and you're becoming emotional for no reason. If you think you're right then make the actual argument, don't deflect by pretending you're being treated unfairly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...