Omar Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 MadMax, IsntLifeFunny, and Rogue 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post OILERMAN Posted July 27, 2025 Popular Post Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 Alzarius, rns90, Btowner, and 10 others 13 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 These liars just lie, then morons like LTF come in here and defend it a parrot it. One of millions of examples LongTimeFan, Btowner, and pat 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 10 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: These liars just lie, then morons like LTF come in here and defend it a parrot it. One of millions of examples They lie knowing they rarely get corrected in real time. And when they are corrected they don’t care and keep lying. OILERMAN, IsntLifeFunny, Come on Titans, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 A few days ago, as the Jeffrey Epstein scandal gripped Washington, Senator Ron Wyden offered a striking revelation in an interview with The New York Times. The Oregon Democrat said that his investigators had discovered that four big banks had flagged to the Treasury Department $1.5 billion in potentially suspicious money transfers involving Epstein, much of which appeared to be related to his massive sex-trafficking network. Now Wyden is ratcheting things up once again. Wyden’s office just sent a new letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi—which The New Republic obtained—suggesting seven potent lines of inquiry that the Justice Department could follow, right now, to dig more deeply into Epstein’s web of financial relations with global elites. “I am convinced that the DOJ ignored evidence found in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Epstein file, a binder that contains extensive details on the mountains of cash Epstein received from prominent businessmen that Epstein used to finance his criminal network,” Wyden writes in the letter. The Treasury Department has this information because that’s where banks file suspicious activity reports, or SARS. Wyden’s letter says his staff has documented that Epstein-related filings by banks contain “information on more than 4,725 wire transfers involving Epstein’s accounts, all of which merit further investigation.” That appears to mean Wyden’s investigators saw evidence in those SARS that a large chunk of the money that passed through Epstein’s network was related to that sex trafficking. As the letter notes: Epstein clearly had access to enormous financing to operate his sex trafficking network, and the details on how he got the cash to pay for it are sitting in a Treasury Department filing cabinet. In an intriguing move, Wyden also presses DOJ to examine “hundreds of millions of dollars in wire transfers” discovered by his investigators that passed through “several now-sanctioned Russian banks.” The latter adds suggestively: “It appears that these wire transfers were correlated to the movement of women or girls around the world.” https://newrepublic.com/article/198247/trump-epstein-fiasco-ron-wyden Question for Trump/Bondi: Has there ever been a wire transfer to or from a Trump account to an Epstein account? For Bondi: Who are the individuals that transfered money to the Epstein accounts? IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 2 hours ago, ctm said: Question for Trump/Bondi: Has there ever been a wire transfer to or from a Trump account to an Epstein account? I've seen reports that Trump and Russia are tied to transfers connected to Epstein. I don't know how credible but it would damn sure explain why Trump is shitting himself over all this. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 26 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: I've seen reports that Trump and Russia are tied to transfers connected to Epstein. I don't know how credible but it would damn sure explain why Trump is shitting himself over all this. Reporters and others are looking in the wrong place. It's not the DOJ files, it's the treasury SARS files. As always, follow the money. Eventually they will figure it out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted July 27, 2025 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 On 7/25/2025 at 9:39 PM, reo said: get ready for that pardon @Little Earl and @Titandan. we all know it's coming. Is Trump going to pardon her? All I heard we they were offering her limited immunity. We gotta give her something to spill the beans, no? Whether or not she's credible is up for debate. But I already criticized the Trump admin for their handling of Epstein. Let's turn the table. Did you like the fact that the Biden admin (AKA DNC Establishment) swept the whole thing under the rug? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 5 minutes ago, Titandan said: We gotta give her something to spill the beans, no? If a pardoned is dangled before her only the dumbest fucking Maga people would pretend to believe a word she says reo, Omar, and IsntLifeFunny 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 27, 2025 Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 6 minutes ago, Titandan said: Did you like the fact that the Biden admin (AKA DNC Establishment) swept the whole thing under the rug? I like the fact Trump is sweeping it under the rug and you're trying to pretend it was Biden who did. Trump and co. promised it, ran on and lied to you saps. Now he's saying ridiculous things only stupid people could possibly believe. The funny thing is had Biden's administration released anything you pea brains would have denied it all. There is a clear distinction between executive power and judicial power, Biden followed it, Trump doesn't. IsntLifeFunny, Come on Titans, Omar, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted July 27, 2025 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 6 hours ago, OILERMAN said: If a pardoned is dangled before her only the dumbest fucking Maga people would pretend to believe a word she says The very next sentence on my post goes as follows. "Whether or not she's credible or not is up for debate." Be nice, old man. I've been trying to be pretty fair and consistent from the get go. Trump screwed the pooch on the Epstein Files. I still hope something will be revealed but that may be just wishful thinking. How's your Sunday going, pops? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted July 27, 2025 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2025 6 hours ago, OILERMAN said: I like the fact Trump is sweeping it under the rug and you're trying to pretend it was Biden who did. They both did (except Trump was only in office for half a year and his base are not all brainwashed lemmings so they called him out on his admin's BS). And any DNC or RNC establishment puppet would have swept it under the rug all the same. Whoever is implicated by the Epstein Files is probably the apex predator among the global elites. Still wish someone with the cojones will risk everything to put them on blast. Nothing partisan about this. I hope we can all agree there are some really powerful people trying to hide some truly insidious shit. OzTitan, and Jamalisms 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 28, 2025 Report Share Posted July 28, 2025 Trump was good friends, hung out and partied with Epstein for 15 years. No evidence that Biden even knew him. So enough with the attemptied false equivalence bs. reo, Omar, Jamalisms, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 28, 2025 Report Share Posted July 28, 2025 1 hour ago, Titandan said: (except Trump was only in office for half a year and his base are not all brainwashed lemmings You know that's exactly what they are, to a degree never seen in presidential history. Trump can even openly say he could shoot someone and wouldn't lose support. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 28, 2025 Report Share Posted July 28, 2025 IsntLifeFunny, and MadMax 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.