Jump to content

How much better would this team be with Tannehill as our starting QB?


lilkhmerkid4u

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Tannehill stated he was in no rush to sign and would only go to the right opportunity (which may still come up this season). He said there was interest but it didn't feel right so he'd prefer to wait

Tannehill and Henry are remarkably similar in that when their surroundings are good and reliable they can play at an elite level but when things are shitty, they at least look worse than you would exp

Flacco actually is a perfect example. Years ago he was considered as toast as toast could get & he’s lit it up two years in a row now.   A lot of it is injury related which is hard for f

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, EC34 said:

ZERO percent.  Did you notice he is still on the street? 

Tannehill stated he was in no rush to sign and would only go to the right opportunity (which may still come up this season). He said there was interest but it didn't feel right so he'd prefer to wait and see if an injury happens on a good team.

 

Who knows whether such a good team would sign him, we won't know until a good team loses their QB for the season and doesn't want to tank it afterwards.

 

As for the Titans, he'd probably look better than Rudolph did but with a completely new offense, who knows. It doesn't seem like he'd be getting pressured as much as he had the last two seasons at least.

Edited by OzTitan
Link to post
Share on other sites

A player like Tannehill would only be worth it for a team that lost their starter(Indy) and was in contention for a playoff.  Imagine if the Colts were pretty much already in the playoffs and Flacco went down.  Tannehill was the kind of guy who could come in and try to keep it going.  In reality he can't do that anymore.

 

Tannehill was a damn good QB, tough as nails and would do anything to win.  He threw an accurate very catchable ball.  He needed to stay upright and on his spot to do it.  He stood on his spot and took hellacious hits to complete his throws.  He took many more big hits than average QBs. He was tough, but in 2022 you could see the decline.  That's why his career didn't last as long as you would think for a QB with his talent.  Way too many big hits.  He's done.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tannehill looked rough last year but I was rewatching the games and it's clear his struggles had a lot to do with the OL. Not to mention the lack of weapons. While the OL isn't completely solved it's vastly improved from last year.

 

A lot of these games were close and Tannehill would likely flipped many of those losses to wins.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Tannehill went to a team with a good supporting cast(OL and skill people) he could likely still play well. 

 

Tomato Can looks better on a loaded team, so could Tannehill. 

 

As for how good could the Titans be if he was the starter?

 

image.png.ef758a9042fef3a3b2cbbd09af824b38.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BudsOilers said:

It would be better but still flawed.  The idea Tannehill on his couch isn't significantly better than some of the starters and certainly any of the Titans QB's on the roster is humorous. 

 

ABT wanted this.  Congrats.

I mean we wanted better than Levis. Everyone wanted stroud, but you conveniently forget that part. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...