Jump to content

Titans New Stadium Discussion


Recommended Posts

Just now, wiscotitansfan said:

I'm just curious why people believe that Nashville is unique that the NFL prioritizes as a fanbase when damn near everyone in this entire forum cries about how little respect the small market Titans receive

I think the NFL likes being in entertainment hubs.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Bud on suicide watch

I'm still holding out hope Austin or San Antonio can swoop in at the last minute!

Get rekt     

Posted Images

1 minute ago, japan said:

I think the NFL likes being in entertainment hubs.  

To the point that they will give up 100s of millions in stadium fees/taxes? Of course not.

 

You don't even believe that the NFL would prioritize a city's reputation over the bottom line. It's weird how you think that I am crying so much for pointing out how illogical some people are being.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

The NFL likes Nashville but they would like Austin or San Antonio with the same stadium/deal.  Or St. Louis. ....and that's really the point.

 

I'd also note San Antonio is 3rd in hosting Final 4's in the modern era and is scheduled for 2025 too so they clearly can hold big events too.  

Disagree on St Louis.  That would be a downgrade.  San Antonio would be a lateral move into an already covered market.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said:

To the point that they will give up 100s of millions in stadium fees/taxes? Of course not.

 

You don't even believe that the NFL would prioritize a city's reputation over the bottom line. It's weird how you think that I am crying so much for pointing out how illogical some people are being.

You definitely are doing a ton of crying in this thread.  It's the cost of business in dealing with the NFL unless you can find an owner who is super rich and isn't the poorest owner in the league.  Tourists will be paying for this stadium.  The Titans fans who live in Nashville are happy.  Some of the Titans/Oilers fans who don't, aren't as happy this morning... 🤷‍♂️

Edited by japan
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said:

I'm just curious why people believe that Nashville is unique that the NFL prioritizes as a fanbase when damn near everyone in this entire forum cries about how little respect the small market Titans receive

It's definitely not unique but it's an attractive option (from the NFL perspective) that also regionally aligns and has been incredibly successful hosting large events.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, japan said:

Some of the Titans/Oilers fans who don't, aren't as happy this morning... 🤷‍♂️

I don't think there's a single person that is unhappy with the city bending over to the NFL. It was expected by everyone because as you said, it's the cost of doing business with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The entire point all along which for some reason people seem to want to argue against is that the NFL doesn't prioritize Nashville enough to the tune of losing out on funding (it's obviously only about money and they aren't looking to give out a entertainment hub discount) and if the city didn't agree to the contract demands that the NFL wants, the NFL will just gladly move to a city that has no problem signing on the dotted line to hand over 100s of millions.

 

Of course the NFL WANTS to be in Nashville (I've never said anything close to denying that), but they certainly won't treat that city any more special than anyone they've ever done business with and strong armed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The overwhelming idiot takes in this thread were that:

 

  • The city had any leverage over the Titans and NFL in this negotiation
  • The NFL prioritized Nashville as a venue versus another city in the scenario where the city would not fund the project to the team and NFL's demands.

Any long time Oiler/Titan fan knew how this would play out if the city didn't play ball and pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wiscotitansfan said:

The entire point all along which for some reason people seem to want to argue against is that the NFL doesn't prioritize Nashville enough to the tune of losing out on funding (it's obviously only about money and they aren't looking to give out a entertainment hub discount) and if the city didn't agree to the contract demands that the NFL wants, the NFL will just gladly move to a city that has no problem signing on the dotted line to hand over 100s of millions.

 

Of course the NFL WANTS to be in Nashville (I've never said anything close to denying that), but they certainly won't treat that city any more special than anyone they've ever done business with and strong armed.

I think the NFL would try very hard to keep the team here if push came to shove.  Versus going back to a declining city like STL. 

 

Side note: Keeping a team in a city doesn't always have to be about money.  Case in point is New Orleans playing the race card after Katrina to stop the move to San Antonio.  NFL values PR sometime over money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, japan said:

I think the NFL would try very hard to keep the team here if push came to shove.  Versus going back to a declining city like STL. 

I honestly think you are just trying to be offended and think I am knocking a city.

 

Of course the NFL wants to stay and will try very hard to do so. But in a case like this where the city was trying to stand it's ground financially at the negotiating table putting their own demands into the contract is something the NFL isn't going to consider. The NFL loses no PR whatsoever by telling the world that they are moving to a city that is more in step with them.

Edited by wiscotitansfan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Aside from Kroenke moving the Rams, I don't think there's been one other team that willingly moved from one city to another by choice.  They all were results of failed attempts to either get a new stadium or substantial improvements to the existing venue and lease.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously a team can leave Nashville.  Teams have left Los Angeles, Cleveland, Houston, St. Louis, San Diego, Oakland and nearly the Boston area over the last 30 years.  Nashville's not an exception to that.  I'm sure the NFL's preference is for no team to ever leave their city.  But sometimes that's not how it works out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...