Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Bud on suicide watch

I'm still holding out hope Austin or San Antonio can swoop in at the last minute!

Get rekt     

Posted Images

16 minutes ago, No1TitansFan said:

What's really hilarious is the corporate conortium opposing the ammendment, as if big music business is the slightest bit concerned about how much event goers pay for tickets. 

Ofc they care, they want to be the ones squeezing every last penny they can out of the customers not letting someone else do it. Does it really matter for them? No, but they sure as hell want to be the ones making that extra 3-10%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think their big point, of course, is that a higher "tax" or "fee" makes them less competitive with other venues/cities for concerts and events.  That's in part why the other council person is trying to propose a 3% cap for the city.   The team may still balk as of right now, the agreement entitles the Titans to this money, not the city.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This article breaks down what the Council member changed pretty well

 

Quote

Under the original deal, each ticket for events like concerts and college sports would come with a $3 flat fee, with the revenue directed into a fund the Titans could use on stadium renovations to the new facility. 

 

Taylor’s proposal changed that payment to a 3% fee — which would be incrementally raised to a maximum of 10% over seven years — with the first $3 of that percentage going to the renovation fund and the rest to the city’s general fund. 

 

There is debate on whether to call these charges a fee or tax. The mayor’s office and Titans are calling this a fee as part of the team’s rent for the new stadium to lower the threshold from 27 to 21 votes necessary to pass the deal. This means the ticket fee or tax doesn’t have to be paid by ticket buyers. Instead, the Titans and promoters can choose whether to pass it on to consumers.

 

https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/04/17/titans-stadium-deal-opponents-slip-in-language-to-redirect-funds-to-taxpayers-pandemonium-ensues/

 

The second article claims another council member is working to propose an amendment to the amendment wiping away the 10% and instead making it 3%.

 

Quote

The delay will allow Councilmember Jennifer Gamble to propose a modification of Taylor’s amendment, which would cap the ticket tax at 3% and exempt college events and the CMA from paying the fee. Her amendment will also put the tax revenue in a special fund instead of the city’s main fund. 

Gamble called it a “compromise” because sports and concerts groups thought the fee would be too costly to host events in Nashville and instead they would go to places like Indianapolis. 

 

https://frontofficesports.com/titans-sec-oppose-attempted-ticket-tax-on-nashville-stadium-proposal/

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Justafan said:

Good luck fellas with the move the stadium campaign.  NFL wants a stadium in Nashville and Nashville is gonna make it happen.  Titans are going to stay right where they are for a very long time.  

It was always about the funding.  The NFL and team wanted a new stadium regardless of location.  Nashville is not some strategic market for them….

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Amy said:

So they vote again next Tuesday and then after that if it is approved and if they could (which I know they can’t), they technically could break ground after that?

Sounds like 3rd reading us supposed to be a formality from everything I’ve read on it.

 

I don’t think the people opposed to the stadium have enough votes at this point. The guy that tried the big bait and switch with the 10% deal voted no

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

Sounds like 3rd reading us supposed to be a formality from everything I’ve read on it.

 

I don’t think the people opposed to the stadium have enough votes at this point. The guy that tried the big bait and switch with the 10% deal voted no

Thank You.  Was confused why they have to vote three times and a week apart 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

It was always about the funding.  The NFL and team wanted a new stadium regardless of location.  Nashville is not some strategic market for them….

Do you not see why people have called you out on this? You’ve been openly rooting for it. You’ve been absolutely giddy about the possibility. No one is denying the NFL always wins. If the NFL and team wanted to stick it to the city then they would have unilaterally renewed their lease and said 100% fun the contractually obligated upgrades out of the general fund. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...