Jump to content

Titans Get The #4 Pick In The Draft


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Love immediately makes you a more explosive team. He's going to add 10-20 TDs a year through the run and pass game. He's going to upgrade your pass protection. He's going to force teams to account for

The Jaguars gave up what again for Travis Hunter? This notion we should take less capital is kind of mind boggling. If a team wants to move then they need to pay the full price.

lol    

Posted Images

13 minutes ago, Justafan said:

The Titans aren't taking a G or C at 35. If they take an IOL in the second, it will be after they trade back. Otherwise, it's a reach for a need instead of getting a solid player. The sweet spot is 50-75, which is why many people are saying they will wait until pick 66. I think there is a strong possibility they trade back in the second to amass more top 100 picks and then possibly even trade back up later as well. 

 

The Titans need an Edge, WR, and IOL in the top 100 picks imo. If they want Love at #4, they'll have to trade back in the second to hit all of those positions. If they take Bailey at #4, then I think they may take a WR at 35 and then address IOL at 66. 

 

Just some random thoughts. 

You forgot the best version, Tate, edge then IOL😉 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Justafan said:

The Titans aren't taking a G or C at 35. If they take an IOL in the second, it will be after they trade back. Otherwise, it's a reach for a need instead of getting a solid player. The sweet spot is 50-75, which is why many people are saying they will wait until pick 66. I think there is a strong possibility they trade back in the second to amass more top 100 picks and then possibly even trade back up later as well. 

 

The Titans need an Edge, WR, and IOL in the top 100 picks imo. If they want Love at #4, they'll have to trade back in the second to hit all of those positions. If they take Bailey at #4, then I think they may take a WR at 35 and then address IOL at 66. 

 

Just some random thoughts. 

 

The question is how far back can you go and still get one of Bisontis, Pregnon or Rutledge.

 

Personally I think Dunker is a tier below those 3.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OnsideKick said:

 

 

If we don't draft an edge at 4 and if we miss out on an edge if we trade back from 35, he could be a really good sneaky consolation prize at the back of the 2nd/top of the 3rd in leu of getting an edge. He would be a great DPR IDL or rotational piece to give Simmons/JFM a break.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Justafan said:

 

Another stat that is misleading because of the team he was on. You try and break out on a team with smith, harrison and egbuka. Thats multiple first round talents with seniority and wr jesus. 

 

Edit: he also had a pretty good sophmore season, idk If i would say he didnt "break out" till his last year. 

Edited by Callidus
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, airmcnair22 said:

Another radio call with  Schefter on Love going to Washington

 

 

 

I think one of the teams behind the Titans is prodding him to keep peddling this. Even if it's true the Titans aren't planning on taking Love at 4 it would greatly benefit us for them to think we do so that maybe someone who's afraid he won't drop will jump up to our spot to get him.

 

Or maybe it's the Titans trying to muddy the waters. Idk... but it's getting deep into propaganda season now, especially with the pro days popping off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

 

The question is how far back can you go and still get one of Bisontis, Pregnon or Rutledge.

 

Personally I think Dunker is a tier below those 3.

 

 

 

How dare you insult Free Bird like that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Callidus said:

Another stat that is misleading because of the team he was on. You try and break out on a team with smith, harrison and egbuka. Thats multiple first round talents with seniority and wr jesus. 

 

Edit: he also had a pretty good sophmore season, idk If i would say he didnt "break out" till his last year. 

 

Don't you get exhausted having to constantly rebuttal that bullshit about him never being a #1 on that depth chart? It's like do people think the reputation Ohio State has built these last few years was bullshit? One of their alumni just became the highest paid WR in NFL history and at least 1-2 more from them are going to come in and take his place in a couple years.

 

Tate fits the hole on our depth chart better than any other receiver in the whole class. And he's coming from the creme de le creme of WR producing universities right now. The arguments against him are bankrupt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

DL and OL a way higher priority than  WR.... I wouldn't be surprised if WR is ignored in the draft

Or perhaps one of the really tall developmental WR in the later rounds  to be an X receiver next year..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...