Jump to content

Amy Adams Strunk likely behind stripping Brian Callahan of his play-calling(Terry McCormick)


OILERMAN

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

 

Might of been Breer or Fowler but one of the national guys reported this week that the Titans are not using a search firm for the HC search.


Thank god. With Brinker, Borgonzi, Zeigler, and Smith, they have all the football people in the room they need to be able to create, compile, and interview the best candidates there are for this job. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 712
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

rumor is Amy was the one demanding all the wr screens

Why hire Brinker and give him total control over football decisions if you're going to meddle and make decisions like this.    She's just like her dad if this story is true and there is litt

It's 1 of 32. It is going to attract a quality candidate. The bears fired Matt Eberflus midseason and hired Ben Johnson.    This whole notion of "no one is going to want the job" is bullshit

Posted Images

6 hours ago, titanskick8851 said:


Thank god. With Brinker, Borgonzi, Zeigler, and Smith, they have all the football people in the room they need to be able to create, compile, and interview the best candidates there are for this job. 

Why is this even necessary?  I'd like to know the coaches places by these firms, and if they've found any candidates beyond the options which are obvious to everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TF_Titan said:

The pool of potential NFL head coaches is incredibly small and the candidates are well known within the NFL fraternity. I wouldn't expect search firms would provide much benefit other than saving them some administrative legwork reaching out to guys and coordinating interviews. It's not like they're going to uncover some hidden gem they didn't know about. I'm sure they either already know, or will soon know who their primary targets are barring someone unexpectedly becomes available later in the season.

 

Yeah. They are used more often for front office types. Even so a benefit of a search firm even for HCs is the common set of criteria and the way candidates are compared and presented. With established guys like Brinker and Borgonzi on board, there is far less a benefit to use a search firm or outside consultant like you said.

Edited by oldschool
Link to post
Share on other sites

They do it for the cash.  Incentives dictate their outcomes.  corporatizing NFL franchises has been the biggest mistake for goverance in the last 25 yrs.  It is good for profit but not outcome and because it drives the profits that is why they keep it in place.  You can blame Jerry Jones for this change.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, titanruss said:

 

Well when you've got 12 weeks to look yourselves then it seems superfluous. 

We could probably find every single person that's 65 and under that has been a head coach and / or OC in college or pros within a day or two. 

 

Brinker said that think their process was correct last time. So that indicates to me an Offensive HC

They also lament the lack of experience and the need to right the ship.. so someone that's been a HC before. 

List is already getting much smaller. 

Wait, Brinker said the approach was correct last time? Wow. Yeah fire that motherfucker into the sun. Hand the reins to Borgonzi. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mythos27 said:

This is a tough situation for me because I try hard to not have overly strong opinions on things I don't feel I know enough about and this is one of them but I know enough to be very concerned that we are not under strong leadership. I'm hanging all of my hopes for the future of the franchise on Borgonzi because if we can have a few more drafts like this past one, we'll climb out of the hole almost regardless of what Strunk does or doesn't do. Talent is king. 

Hearing that Brinker doesn't question their process is a massive red flag to me. I don't care about the politics of it. I don't care what Callahan's qualifications were. To say that out loud after hiring that fucking loser is beyond me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Huh? The process could have been correct but yield the wrong outcome. In this case Callahan didnt perform. Most HC hires fail. 

The process wasn't fine. It was overseen by Carthon, who we know is lazy and an idiot. It led to hiring a coach who never called plays from an offense that gets its QBs killed and relies on elite talent at the position to function, which obviously resulted in us being the worst team in the NFL in a decade+. It wasn't fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

The process wasn't fine. It was overseen by Carthon, who we know is lazy and an idiot. It led to hiring a coach who never called plays from an offense that gets its QBs killed and relies on elite talent at the position to function, which obviously resulted in us being the worst team in the NFL in a decade+. It wasn't fine.

 

You are confusing outcome with process. They interviewed all the hot candidates on the market. Callahan had ringing endorsements from coaches and players alike. The team thought it was an acceptable risk to hire a young OFF guy who hadn't called plays and let him grow into the position. They were obviously wrong and Callahan didn't work out, couldn't handle the jump to HC. It happens. That doesn't mean the process is broken. it simply means they chose wrong. Like I said the vast majority of HC hires fail within 2-3 years. Lastly, if you really think they aren't looking into things to tweak during the selection process, you are crazy. The most obvious one is they can't afford to take a chance on another unproven guy and let him learn on the job. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, oldschool said:

 

You are confusing outcome with process. They interviewed all the hot candidates on the market. Callahan had ringing endorsements from coaches and players alike. The team thought it was an acceptable risk to hire a young OFF guy who hadn't called plays and let him grow into the position. They were obviously wrong and Callahan didn't work out, couldn't handle the jump to HC. It happens. That doesn't mean the process is broken. it simply means they chose wrong. Like I said the vast majority of HC hires fail within 2-3 years. Lastly, if you really think they aren't looking into things to tweak during the selection process, you are crazy. The most obvious one is they can't afford to take a chance on another unproven guy and let him learn on the job. 

Once again, the process was over headed by a guy who was fired for being lazy. Not a great point man. The process was flawed from there. 

 

Hired a guy who had never called plays to call plays. Might want to rethink that one! 

 

Hired a guy who never once in his career elevated the play of the QB except for a 6 game run with a backup QB. Every QB he worked with prior is a HOFer. Might want to see player progression next time?

 

Hired a soft spoken beta male as an overcorrection. Maybe want to tweak the over correction? 

 

That process was likely dog shit and the results speak for themselves. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TF_Titan said:

 

The process and the people executing it are two different things.

Depends on who instituted the process. Carthon was the point man and oversaw it. Was he the architect? He probably had quite a bit of say in the process itself. So, no, not really. They're intertwined. 

 

If you guys can't see that statement for what it is I.E. "none of this was my fault" I don't know what to tell you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ctm said:

Callihan  was the first person interviewed.  AAS sat in on the interviews.  They wouldn't let Callihan leave to interview elsewhere.  Good chance this was a consensus decision by the owner and front office.

Yeah they might want to rethink that step in the process and actually interview multiple candidates. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Wait, Brinker said the approach was correct last time? Wow. Yeah fire that motherfucker into the sun. Hand the reins to Borgonzi. 

 

The approach was good. Callahan just sucked. Unless that was predictable (Holz was a warning sign and I quibble a bit over his contact with great QBs but not much else) I have no issues with that comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...