Jump to content

Trade Deadline Discussion


AussieTitanFan08

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Titandan said:

Is Key a difference maker? 

 

If he's not in our long term plans, I think we should trade him.  

If they can get a 5th or a decent 6th im for it. If not as meh as he is our edge depth is so bad keeping him around is likely the better option. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Pollard to the Ravens?

If you think trading away AJ Brown was a bad idea, trading Simmons is far, far worse.  He's a high level established player in his prime. Trading him also likely gets a huge negative reaction from tea

Once the Jets got Brownlee they didn't need Gardener

Posted Images

On 10/10/2025 at 12:01 PM, TerryBoats said:

It's for his benefit as well.  They likely won't replace him with the late 1st they'd get, but they could find another quality player and spend their own 1st on Peter Woods and likely come out of this just fine.  While he'd be able to compete for a SB.

 

With all due respect to Simmons. Who gives a fuck what's best for him? You don't put your team in a worse situation in order to put one of your players in a better situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TF_Titan said:

 

With all due respect to Simmons. Who gives a fuck what's best for him? You don't put your team in a worse situation in order to put one of your players in a better situation.

Players like Simmons usually get a say in where they are traded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone think Brinker/Borgonzi actually have the stomach to do what is necessary ahead of the trade deadline and try and get something for any player not in their plans post 2025 even if it could be even more detrimental to Ward's development over these last 11 games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

Anyone think Brinker/Borgonzi actually have the stomach to do what is necessary ahead of the trade deadline and try and get something for any player not in their plans post 2025 even if it could be even more detrimental to Ward's development over these last 11 games.

Brinker needs to go with Callahan.  Nobody who had a say in or who was even a passive participant in the Callahan hire can be trusted to make high level decisions for an NFL team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

Anyone think Brinker/Borgonzi actually have the stomach to do what is necessary ahead of the trade deadline and try and get something for any player not in their plans post 2025 even if it could be even more detrimental to Ward's development over these last 11 games.

 

I think they do. The real question is who is/isn't in their plans for 2026 and beyond? The roster has so many holes who do you decide who to move on from? say a guy like McCreary or even chig? guys you can easily afford? I'd move on from both but I don't get paid to be the GM of the Titans so its easy to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion.

 

Players not available aside from rookies.....Skoronski, Simmons, Latham, Grey, Sweat

 

Players I would not trade because they play above their contracts......Udoh, Levin, McCreary

(obviously no one is trading for Udoh or Levin)

 

everyone else is fair game....

 

On Simmons. He probably has three or four more years of elite play. If we can't turn this thing around by then we should just all quit. 

Edited by Lantern
Link to post
Share on other sites

If Amy thought that Robinson's 7-5 record wasn't sufficient to keep him employed for the remainder of the drain, there is no reason for Callahan to still be here.  There was no reason to keep him after last season.  The organization is trying to do damage control for that decision so that they don't appear like a dumpster fire like the Jets, having to settle for another bad HC candidate like Aaron Glenn.  We better hope that it doesn't end up getting Ward hurt or  set back his development too far, as things are definitely trending that way.

Edited by TerryBoats
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

Anyone think Brinker/Borgonzi actually have the stomach to do what is necessary ahead of the trade deadline and try and get something for any player not in their plans post 2025 even if it could be even more detrimental to Ward's development over these last 11 games.


If they are on the fence now…next week should push them into clarity with 2.5 weeks left in the deadline after the NE game. 
 

For me personally, I trade them all if there is any value to be had. I’m fine with rookies, older PS vets, and depth guys playing the rest of the year. Can’t be much worse than we’ve seen through the first 6 games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...