Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, NashvilleNinja said:

 

But if we trade down from 35, we could potentially do all 3... Edge, WR, and OL. Maybe the individual pieces later won't be as good as the one piece at 35 would have been, but thanks to JQuiver and Ran-away we need quantity just as much as we do quality at this point.

 

 

 

Comedy Central Mm GIF by Workaholics

Im all for drafting a guard but idk how it fits in before the 4th round. Especially if we dont get a trade back. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I think the reality is that if the Titans are forced to stick and pick on day 1 and 2, it's simply unrealistic to expect them to be dramatically improved in the short term even if the long term view i

Not sure how anyone can read that EDGE writeup and think that isn’t the biggest need outside of qb.

Given the current state of the roster you can't be mad if Borgonzi trades back from #35, takes an EDGE or takes a WR.   Projecting out 12 months Jaylen Harrell might be the only "contributor

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said:

 

But if we trade down from 35, we could potentially do all 3... Edge, WR, and OL. Maybe the individual pieces later won't be as good as the one piece at 35 would have been, but thanks to JQuiver and Ran-away we need quantity just as much as we do quality at this point.

 

 

 

Comedy Central Mm GIF by Workaholics

Ideally you’d trade down from like 35 to something like 45 (or close by) pick up an early 3rd and take best available edge /wr with those picks and grab best available OL with the first pick of the fourth round.  Would also consider a TE w/that pick as well .

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, headhunter said:

We will take a OT over guard at some point in the draft

Which OT are scheduled to go in round 4?  Could see that 2nd fourth rounder being used there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Callidus said:

Im all for drafting a guard but idk how it fits in before the 4th round. Especially if we dont get a trade back. 

 

Barring any wild/inexplicable events transpiring (trade down from 1, trading Simmons for picks, etc) we've got limited resources. Any chance we have to increase those should be a welcome one.

 

Assuming we truly are taking Cam and not trading down, staying at 35 is a luxury we probably can't afford, unless we just don't get any offers there. But if one of those expected 1st round edge guys falls to 35 there may be a suitor or two we can milk something out of. Are the Burches and Princleys of the draft so much worse than those guys?

 

1 minute ago, rns90 said:

Ideally you’d trade down from like 35 to something like 45 (or close by) pick up an early 3rd and take best available edge /wr with those picks and grab best available OL with the first pick of the fourth round.  Would also consider a TE w/that pick as well .

 

Yep, or trade down even further in the 2nd to the 50s if you can pick up another pick on top of the 3rd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zach Lyons may be right. Fuck the defense. Can't fix both sides of the ball. Go get a #2 WR,  a #3 WR, a G to replace Zeitler in a year or two, a true swing tackle who could replace Moore if they walk away from his contract after 2 years, a hammerhead RB and a big body TE. Yes, we are likely to give up 45 points a game. But give Cam Ward a chance to be successful. Fix the defense in '26.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NashvilleNinja said:

 

Barring any wild/inexplicable events transpiring (trade down from 1, trading Simmons for picks, etc) we've got limited resources. Any chance we have to increase those should be a welcome one.

 

Assuming we truly are taking Cam and not trading down, staying at 35 is a luxury we probably can't afford, unless we just don't get any offers there. But if one of those expected 1st round edge guys falls to 35 there may be a suitor or two we can milk something out of. Are the Burches and Princleys of the draft so much worse than those guys?

 

 

Yep, or trade down even further in the 2nd to the 50s if you can pick up another pick on top of the 3rd.

I agree, i think trading down from 35 is a necessity unless some nutjob wants to give us a 3rd for levis straight up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NashvilleNinja said:

 

Are the Burches and Princleys of the draft so much worse than those guys?

I don’t see it with Burch.  I just saw a guy who got cleanup sacks who has great triangle numbers.

 

I think they stick and pick if there’s someone they clearly expected to be gone is still sitting there when 35 comes up (WR or edge).  But outside of that odds are it’s a trade down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Callidus said:

I agree, i think trading down from 35 is a necessity unless some nutjob wants to give us a 3rd for levis straight up. 

I think a 4th is the most we can expect here.  Hes worth more than a 6th though.  
 

A 5th sounds right for the return on a trade.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rns90 said:

I don’t see it with Burch.  I just saw a guy who got cleanup sacks who has great triangle numbers.

 

I think they stick and pick if there’s someone they clearly expected to be gone is still sitting there when 35 comes up (WR or edge).  But outside of that odds are it’s a trade down.

Yep

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Callidus said:

I agree, i think trading down from 35 is a necessity unless some nutjob wants to give us a 3rd for levis straight up. 

 

I would run screaming to that trade like Bongo to turn in a card for... whatever he's turning it in for.

 

12 minutes ago, rns90 said:

I don’t see it with Burch.  I just saw a guy who got cleanup sacks who has great triangle numbers.

 

I think they stick and pick if there’s someone they clearly expected to be gone is still sitting there when 35 comes up (WR or edge).  But outside of that odds are it’s a trade down.

 

I just wonder... let's say both Eze and Golden fell to 35 and they stayed to pick one of them who would it be? Who should it be? Who would you want it to be?

 

9 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

I just can't imagine a team trying to sell Levis to the fan base as hope....

 

Desperation is a virtue for some. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...