Jump to content

Trump tariff thread


Starkiller

Recommended Posts

President Donald Trump on Thursday contradicted his top aides on the purpose of his sprawling new global tariff regime, adding to the uncertainty over the trade war that has sent markets reeling.

Earlier in the day, top Trump aide Peter Navarro and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the president was not looking to strike deals over the tariffs. “This is not a negotiation,” Navarro told CNBC.

White House officials also circulated internal talking points telling surrogates that the tariffs should not be characterized as a starting point for negotiations, according to three people with knowledge of the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal matters.

But after markets closed down sharply, Trump told h on Airi Force One that he would be open to striking deals with individual countries.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/trump-contradicts-aides-talking-points-on-purpose-of-global-tariffs/ar-AA1Cfwpm?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=f21fb039135046efaeb3af6cd6a5d7ee&ei=22

 

This is the contradiction I've posted about.  Are the tariffs a short term negotiating tactic or a long term plan to reshore manufacturing?  Even Trump and his aides can't agree on their own strategy.  I guarantee that the CEOs and guys on wall street with the sharp pencils can see the issue here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It's really hard to fathom the level of retardation that is required to vote someone in based on reacting to high (but falling) inflation, and then supporting this idiot as he goes about implementing

It isn't difficult; they are just that stupid...

Also, can we just laugh at the absurdity of Trump claiming to be some master deal-maker and then revealing that the primary tool in his tool-kit is threatening his allies with economic violence? Are w

Posted Images

52 minutes ago, ctm said:

 

Yup. The most likely outcome here if Trump doesn't back down is that the global economy moves on sans the U.S. which means USD will be sidelined and countries like China will step in, already seeing it with the Japan, South Korea, and the China trade agreement. The EU and Canada will follow suit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Yup. The most likely outcome here if Trump doesn't back down is that the global economy moves on sans the U.S. which means USD will be sidelined and countries like China will step in, already seeing it with the Japan, South Korea, and the China trade agreement. The EU and Canada will follow suit. 

 

China's finance ministry on Friday said it will impose a 34% tariff on all goods imported from the U.S. starting on April 10, following duties imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration earlier this week, according to state news outlet Xinhua.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/china-to-impose-34-retaliatory-tariff-on-all-goods-imported-from-the-us/ar-AA1ChKKX?ocid=BingNewsSerp

 

Everyone knew there would be countermeasures.  Now we have a tariff war and a race to the bottom.  Meanwhile, Trump is playing golf and market futures are down big again.

 

Next question.  How much punishment can congressional republicans who are on the ballot next year take?  They are going to be absolutely desperate for deficit financed tax cuts.  It's their only lifeline unless they stand up to Trump and his tariffs.

 

 

 

Edited by ctm
Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ctm said:

Next question.  How much punishment can congressional republicans who are on the ballot next year take?  They are going to be absolutely desperate for deficit financed tax cuts.  It's their only lifeline unless they stand up to Trump and his tariffs.

 

Senators unveil bill to claw back power over tariffs amid Trump trade wars

 

Trade Review Act would require greater checks on tariffs in further sign of congressional disquiet over president’s plans

 

The Trade Review Act of 2025, co-sponsored by Senator Chuck Grassley, a top Republican lawmaker from Iowa

 

 

Grassley was not among the four Republican senators who voted to approve a Democratic-led resolution that would nullify the national emergency Trump used to justify 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, which passed shortly after the president’s so-called “liberation day” tariff announcement on Wednesday.

 

Yet support from Grassley, third in line to the presidency as the president pro tempore of the Senate, is a sign of the deep unease many Republicans have with the president’s efforts to remake global trade.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

Senators unveil bill to claw back power over tariffs amid Trump trade wars

 

Trade Review Act would require greater checks on tariffs in further sign of congressional disquiet over president’s plans

 

The Trade Review Act of 2025, co-sponsored by Senator Chuck Grassley, a top Republican lawmaker from Iowa

 

 

Grassley was not among the four Republican senators who voted to approve a Democratic-led resolution that would nullify the national emergency Trump used to justify 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, which passed shortly after the president’s so-called “liberation day” tariff announcement on Wednesday.

 

Yet support from Grassley, third in line to the presidency as the president pro tempore of the Senate, is a sign of the deep unease many Republicans have with the president’s efforts to remake global trade.

 

 

 

The Senate isn't the blocker here, it's the House where that bill likely never sees the floor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldschool said:

 

The Senate isn't the blocker here, it's the House where that bill likely never sees the floor. 

Yea. it's largely symbolic.  Until the Trump's tariff policy actually changes, nothing else is going to matter on the economic front.  Real change is needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ctm said:

Yea. it's largely symbolic.  Until the Trump's tariff policy actually changes, nothing else is going to matter on the economic front.  Real change is needed.

 

Which is why my earlier point is that the GOP has to revolt. It's a question of support for Trump, not legislation. The only way out of this debacle is if Trump back down due to internal pressure. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldschool said:

 

Which is why my earlier point is that the GOP has to revolt. It's a question of support for Trump, not legislation. The only way out of this debacle is if Trump back down due to internal pressure. 

 

Don't tell @Little Earl and @Mercalius.  According to them everything is going according to plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ctm said:

First 4 stories on Fox this AM:

 

Iran

female fencer who refuse to compete against a trans athlete

HS athlete who died in TX

live from Doral golf course

 

No stock ticker or mention of the market

 

Gotta keep the suckers watching

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Which is why my earlier point is that the GOP has to revolt. It's a question of support for Trump, not legislation. The only way out of this debacle is if Trump back down due to internal pressure. 

 

We need a hero to come forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

Senators unveil bill to claw back power over tariffs amid Trump trade wars

 

Trade Review Act would require greater checks on tariffs in further sign of congressional disquiet over president’s plans

 

The Trade Review Act of 2025, co-sponsored by Senator Chuck Grassley, a top Republican lawmaker from Iowa

 

 

Grassley was not among the four Republican senators who voted to approve a Democratic-led resolution that would nullify the national emergency Trump used to justify 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, which passed shortly after the president’s so-called “liberation day” tariff announcement on Wednesday.

 

Yet support from Grassley, third in line to the presidency as the president pro tempore of the Senate, is a sign of the deep unease many Republicans have with the president’s efforts to remake global trade.

 

 

 

Grassley's bill isn't retroactive.  It would do nothing to get rid of existing tariffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...