Jump to content

Hamas Brutally Massacres Scores of Civilians: Israel Turns Genocidal


tgo

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Did this motherfucker just equate the Civil War with the situation in Israel and say it's equivalent with the idea of a 2 state solution? That may be one of the stupidest things I've ever read. 

 

That's because you and other libtards on this site are what your name implies....retarded.

 

Mark Levin tweet:

Caller to my radio show, Bill, made a great point about "a two-state solution."  In 1861, the southern states rebelled and fought for "a two-state solution," setting up their own country and government -- the Confederacy.  In the end, there were 700,000 casualties.  I also don't recall the Army of the North feeding, medicating, and otherwise assisting the citizens in the southern states during the course of the Civil War.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hell yeah! John Calvin & friends never burned "heretics" at the stake. Protestants never burned "witches". All the bad stuff was the Catholics fault! That's the ticket! 

There's simply no defense for what has taken place. This wasn't a military encounter; this was terrorism plain and simple. There's a huge difference. It's unjustifiable and has setback peace for decad

The 6 billion was Iranian money from prior oil sales and held in South Korea.   In addition, it wasn't turned over directly to Iran.  The money is to be used for humanitarian purposes and pa

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Little Earl said:

 

That's because you and other libtards on this site are what your name implies....retarded.

 

Mark Levin tweet:

Caller to my radio show, Bill, made a great point about "a two-state solution."  In 1861, the southern states rebelled and fought for "a two-state solution," setting up their own country and government -- the Confederacy.  In the end, there were 700,000 casualties.  I also don't recall the Army of the North feeding, medicating, and otherwise assisting the citizens in the southern states during the course of the Civil War.

The Confederacy rebelled against their pre-existing country. They were traitors to the United States of America. There was no “two state solution” on the table.
 

And the Union army did not make a habit of simply murdering unarmed civilians in the South to try to get at Confederate troops. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Little Earl said:

 

That's because you and other libtards on this site are what your name implies....retarded.

 

Mark Levin tweet:

Caller to my radio show, Bill, made a great point about "a two-state solution."  In 1861, the southern states rebelled and fought for "a two-state solution," setting up their own country and government -- the Confederacy.  In the end, there were 700,000 casualties.  I also don't recall the Army of the North feeding, medicating, and otherwise assisting the citizens in the southern states during the course of the Civil War.

My name implies retarded? That's a new one, and one I would expect from someone without a sense of humor or any real understanding of the world outside of their Bible study class. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

outside of their Bible study class. 

 

His very skewed, dumbed down Bible study class that has bastardized and distorted all relevant messaging while ignoring key historical context in order to feel powerful, right, and better than anyone who doesn't wholly agree with them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Little Earl said:

 

That's because you and other libtards on this site are what your name implies....retarded.

 

Mark Levin tweet:

Caller to my radio show, Bill, made a great point about "a two-state solution."  In 1861, the southern states rebelled and fought for "a two-state solution," setting up their own country and government -- the Confederacy.  In the end, there were 700,000 casualties.  I also don't recall the Army of the North feeding, medicating, and otherwise assisting the citizens in the southern states during the course of the Civil War.

 

To recap:

1) Posts one of the most retarded analogies I've ever seen as his own work

2) Thinks one is retarded because he called you a libtard

3) Thinks one is a libtard because they can't think for themselves

4) Posts the source of where he ripped off the fucking partial birth abortion of an analogy as his supporting work for his initial statement

 

Upcoming:

5) Watch this post fly right over his head

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/06/04/israel-50-years-occupation-abuses

cover.jpg?itok=yxnyYRBX

 

Illegal Settlements
Israeli authorities have since 1967 facilitated the transfer of its civilians to the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. In 1967, Israel established two settlements in the West Bank: Kfar Etzion and East Talpiot; by 2017, Israel had established 237 settlements there, housing approximately 580,000 settlers. Israel applies Israeli civil law to settlers, affording them legal protections, rights, and benefits that are not extended to Palestinians living in the same territory who are subjected to Israeli military law. Israel provides settlers with infrastructure, services, and subsidies that it denies to Palestinians, creating and sustaining a separate and unequal system of law, rules, and services.

__)__)

They are taking a people's land.  They are currently blowing up their infrastructure.  Do you think the Israeli's deserve more and more of the Palestinians homeland?  Should they be force to give back ALL the land they have taken?

 

There is a lot of wrong that has created this current situation.  The Palestinians have gotten the shit end  of the stick from day one.  

 

We see only one side of the story presented by a media that supports Israel.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Little Earl said:

 

That's because you and other libtards on this site are what your name implies....retarded.

 

Mark Levin tweet:

Caller to my radio show, Bill, made a great point about "a two-state solution."  In 1861, the southern states rebelled and fought for "a two-state solution," setting up their own country and government -- the Confederacy.  In the end, there were 700,000 casualties.  I also don't recall the Army of the North feeding, medicating, and otherwise assisting the citizens in the southern states during the course of the Civil War.

No one gives a fuck what that dumb hack Levin has to say about anything. Why you idiots love con artists so much is astonishing.

Edited by WG53
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Little Earl said:

That's because you and other libtards on this site are what your name implies....retarded.

 

Mark Levin tweet:

Caller to my radio show, Bill, made a great point about "a two-state solution."  In 1861, the southern states rebelled and fought for "a two-state solution," setting up their own country and government -- the Confederacy.  In the end, there were 700,000 casualties.  I also don't recall the Army of the North feeding, medicating, and otherwise assisting the citizens in the southern states during the course of the Civil War.

 

'patriots'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • tgo changed the title to Hamas Brutally Massacres Scores of Civilians: Israel Turns Genocidal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...