Jump to content
Forums Titans & NFL Talk NFL Draft Fantasy Football College Football Other Sports Off-Topic Discussion Politics Feeds New Content Trending My Content All Activity Other Chat Room Podcast Advanced Search

WG53

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    18,984

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

About WG53

  • Rank
    Hall Of Famer
  • Birthday July 29

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

33,429 profile views
  1.    charleytolar reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  2.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Tannehill "In Process" of Getting Vaccine; Would've Declined Without NFL Protocols
  3.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Tannehill "In Process" of Getting Vaccine; Would've Declined Without NFL Protocols
  4.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Tannehill "In Process" of Getting Vaccine; Would've Declined Without NFL Protocols
  5.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Tannehill "In Process" of Getting Vaccine; Would've Declined Without NFL Protocols
  6.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Tannehill "In Process" of Getting Vaccine; Would've Declined Without NFL Protocols
  7.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Only half of NFL teams have 51 or more of their players that are vaccinated? That's absurd.
  8.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Only half of NFL teams have 51 or more of their players that are vaccinated? That's absurd.
  9.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Only half of NFL teams have 51 or more of their players that are vaccinated? That's absurd.
  10.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Only half of NFL teams have 51 or more of their players that are vaccinated? That's absurd.
  11.    titanruss reacted to a post in a topic: NFL Power Rankings
  12.    WG53 reacted to a post in a topic: Only half of NFL teams have 51 or more of their players that are vaccinated? That's absurd.
  13. WG53
  14. WG53
    Just stfu you goddamn moron.
  15.    titanruss reacted to a post in a topic: Only half of NFL teams have 51 or more of their players that are vaccinated? That's absurd.
  16.    OILERMAN reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  17. WG53
    I haven't moved the goalpost at all dipshit. https://www.apa.org/topics/anger You seriously are trying to argue that anger isn't an emotion. We're done here. There's nothing more to be said. You are clearly a simpleton.
  18.    ctm reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  19. WG53
    Do you seriously not think that anger is an emotion? You think that your copy and paste of a definition discounted what I said? Because it most certainly did not. You talk about come back to what you said when nothing you said impacted my statement at all. You didn't negate anything I have said.
  20.    rns90 reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  21.    charleytolar reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  22. WG53
    I don't pay for ESPN. Someone here might. I'm sure that they could be persuaded to post on the subject. We've seen it happen many times before.
  23. WG53
    Well if the efficacy of a vaccine is around 90%....
  24. WG53
    There you go again with your falling on the sword nonsense. JFC you are clueless.
  25. WG53
    It isn't that anyone cares. It is the dead period. It's just content to talk about at this point. Otherwise the board is nearly dead this time of year.
  26. WG53
    Ugh...you are dumb. Falling on a sword? Hardly. Your making shit up is saying I have a limited understanding while you post a dictionary definition of the word anger as if that helped you at all, it didn't. How can you possibly be so stupid as to think anger is not an emotion or that being angry is an emotional state?
  27.    charleytolar reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  28. WG53
    LOL Limited understanding? Nice job making shit up that doesn't match reality. You really need to look up the word anger in order to determine that it is an emotion? Dude. You are incredibly dumb.
  29. WG53
    Definitely in the top 10 at least.
  30. WG53
    You actually think that posting the definition of a word we all know the meaning of is somehow a good retort? You always love to double down on your stupid.
  31. WG53
    Like I don't think RT is currently a top 5 QB but in no way do I think he is anywhere near 14! I figured people here might get a good laugh at the article.
  32.    charleytolar reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  33. WG53
    If you're angry by the very definition then you are emotional. Anger is an emotion. If you are angry then you are being emotional. This is like talking to a 7 year old.
  34.    Mythos27 reacted to a post in a topic: Farley is going to change this team quickly
  35. WG53
    Of course the espn article mentioned here is under their paywall.
×
×
  • Create New...