Jump to content

Biden White House: Year 4


tgo

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, titanruss said:

 

I watched the speech yesterday dumdum.

 

He said sanctions are to inflict the most possible pain without joining a physical war.

 

Sanctions came after they did something. Cant be a deterrent.

 

The rest is just semantics. .. obviously.

Well, then why did his top aides say it was a deterrent? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No I don't think that has anything to do with super rich. It is the top 1.8% of income earners though.    Also if you think the proposals to raise the taxes on people making that much are ex

A couple of years ago, I was  late for a conference call with colleagues in Germany and India. After joining the call and apologizing for being late. Someone from India said, "just be like Trump and s

Voter ID isn't the big issue. The big issue is state law proposals that allow state legislatures to overrule the vote in elections and that take power away from the state's secretaries of state as wel

Posted Images

2 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

There’s no need for clarification. What he said was correct as were the people discussing the start of the invasion. Sanctions were used in hopes of stopping a full on invasion past the Donbas region. Biden was saying the long term goal is to isolate them and that those sanctions were never meant to stop the invasion in the first place and that Europe must unite around removing themselves from dependency on Russian oil and natural gas. 
 

Anyone who doesn’t understand that is either intentionally obtuse or an idiot. 

 

Come on now, "sanctions never deter" was a dumb thing to say.  You've got the entire GOP in line, weapons drawn, aimed, and just waiting for ammo to drop in the chamber.  LTF was more than happy to do so. 

It's clear what Biden's point is, but that was just a dumb thing to say.    

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

Well, then why did his top aides say it was a deterrent? 

 

ask them. Biden said what he said and he made it clear that he's always said that.

 

This is likely mostly just political posturing anyhow. He says deterrent .. you scream it doesnt work because Russia is still there. He says the intention is to inflict pain and you have no answer other than "whatabout"

 

He goes to war there... you say he's starting WW3 and getting involved in things that dont involve us (bet you were all about the middle east wars though!)

He doesnt go to war there... you call him weak.

 

Of the 4 options above - he basically did the one that you cant say shit about other than complaining about something 1 or 2 of his aides said that didnt come from his mouth directly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Rogue said:

 

Come on now, "sanctions never deter" was a dumb thing to say.  You've got the entire GOP in line, weapons drawn, aimed, and just waiting for ammo to drop in the chamber.  LTF was more than happy to do so. 

It's clear what Biden's point is, but that was just a dumb thing to say.    

 

Biden misspeaking or saying kinda dumb things has been his brand forever. It's funny that right wingers think it's some big gotcha.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tgo said:

Saying dumb things is in Biden's DNA. 

 

But let's be real: He says about 1/100th of the dumb shit that Trump does on a constant basis. 

Biden puts his foot in his mouth occasionally. Trump has eaten an entire shoe store…

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, tgo said:

Saying dumb things is in Biden's DNA. 

 

But let's be real: He says about 1/100th of the dumb shit that Trump does on a constant basis. 


Yep.  And so LTF doesn't feel we're being unfair, I'll give the same level of criticism at Biden as LTF did Trump's dumb shit.  Ready?  Here goes.....

 

Quote

 


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/us/politics/biden-billionaires-minimum-tax.html
 

The White House will ask Congress on Monday to pass a new minimum tax on billionaires as part of a budget proposal intended to revitalize President Biden’s domestic agenda and reduce the deficit.

 

The tax would require that American households worth more than $100 million pay a rate of at least 20 percent on their income as well as unrealized gains in the value of their liquid assets, such as stocks and bonds, which can accumulate value for years but are taxed only when they are sold.

 

Mr. Biden’s proposal to impose a tax on billionaires is the first time he has explicitly called for a wealth tax. While many in his party have advocated taxes that target an individual’s wealth — not just income — Mr. Biden has largely steered clear of such proposals in favor of increasing the top marginal income tax rate, imposing a higher tax on capital gains and estates, and raising taxes on corporations.

 

The “Billionaire Minimum Income Tax” would apply only to the top one-hundredth of 1 percent of American households, and over half of the revenue would come from those worth more than $1 billion. Those already paying more than 20 percent would not owe any additional taxes, although those paying below that level would have to pay the difference between their current tax rate and the new 20 percent rate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • tgo changed the title to Biden White House: Year 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...