Little Earl Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 Mark Levin has spoken: In their drive to impeach President Donald Trump, Democrats are throwing out all previous historical precedent and shutting the president and the American people out of it, says LevinTV host Mark Levin. “This is the first time in American history that we have a rogue speaker of the House and a small-majority Democrat Party in the House of Representatives that’s trying to drag our country in a different direction,” Levin explained. “They have rejected, completely and utterly, the background of the impeachment process when it comes to presidents of the United States.” In addition to failing to hold a full House vote on the matter, Levin explained, minority party members of investigating committees have not been given the same investigative powers as they were during previous impeachment efforts. These same process concerns were also laid out in a letter from the White House last week, explaining why the “Executive Branch cannot be expected to participate.” To make his point, Levin referred to a House Judiciary Committee resolution from former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment in October 1998, in which top committee Democrats were given those powers and the inquiry was authorized by a vote of the whole House before it began. “That’s not happening today,” the host remarked. “The Democrats are the only ones who can issue subpoenas and call witnesses and cross-examine and all the rest of it.” The 1998 document also explains that the committee found it necessary to have its investigation authorized by a House vote because “the issue of impeachment is of such overwhelming importance, the Committee decided that it must receive authorization from the full House before proceeding on any further course of action,” as well as the fact that the same historical precedent was set by the House’s impeachment efforts against Presidents Andrew Johnson and Richard Nixon. In contrast, Levin said, the current impeachment effort announced by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has afforded none of the same due process. “This isn’t the way America does things; this isn’t the way our Constitution’s intended to work,” Levin concluded. “The Democrat Party has hijacked the House of Representatives. It doesn’t speak for the full House, because the full House hasn’t spoken. The Democrat Party is pushing this impeachment. This is a Democrat Party impeachment, as I’ve been saying, a silent coup effort. This is why they dispense with all the traditions involving the last three presidents who went through this process.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 15 minutes ago, Rogue said: How long will it before Trump says he never knew RG? He knew him a long time ago and he helped him out in smaller cases. But he moved on because he was a terrible lawyer. MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 Fiona Hill, President Donald Trump's former top Russia adviser, raised concerns about Rudy Giuliani's role in US foreign policy toward Ukraine, telling lawmakers on Monday that she saw "wrongdoing" in the American foreign policy and tried to report it to officials including the National Security Council's attorney, according to multiple sources. "She saw wrongdoing related to the Ukraine policy and reported it," one source said. The same source told CNN that Hill testified that former national security adviser John Bolton referred to Giuliani -- Trump's personal attorney -- as a "hand grenade" who was "going to blow everybody up," as first reported by The New York Times. Hill additionally told lawmakers about what she described as a rogue operation carried out by US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, which Bolton characterized as being like a "drug deal," that source said. A separate source said Hill also drew a link between Sondland and Trump in her testimony. Sondland and Trump "were in direct contact," Hill told the lawmakers, according to the source. This source said Hill said the contacts between Trump and Sondland went beyond the discussion about texts exchanged between Sondland and other American diplomats in Ukraine that have been made public. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Little Earl said: Mark Levin has spoken: In their drive to impeach President Donald Trump, Democrats are throwing out all previous historical precedent and shutting the president and the American people out of it, says LevinTV host Mark Levin. “This is the first time in American history that we have a rogue speaker of the House and a small-majority Democrat Party in the House of Representatives that’s trying to drag our country in a different direction,” Levin explained. “They have rejected, completely and utterly, the background of the impeachment process when it comes to presidents of the United States.” In addition to failing to hold a full House vote on the matter, Levin explained, minority party members of investigating committees have not been given the same investigative powers as they were during previous impeachment efforts. These same process concerns were also laid out in a letter from the White House last week, explaining why the “Executive Branch cannot be expected to participate.” To make his point, Levin referred to a House Judiciary Committee resolution from former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment in October 1998, in which top committee Democrats were given those powers and the inquiry was authorized by a vote of the whole House before it began. “That’s not happening today,” the host remarked. “The Democrats are the only ones who can issue subpoenas and call witnesses and cross-examine and all the rest of it.” The 1998 document also explains that the committee found it necessary to have its investigation authorized by a House vote because “the issue of impeachment is of such overwhelming importance, the Committee decided that it must receive authorization from the full House before proceeding on any further course of action,” as well as the fact that the same historical precedent was set by the House’s impeachment efforts against Presidents Andrew Johnson and Richard Nixon. In contrast, Levin said, the current impeachment effort announced by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has afforded none of the same due process. “This isn’t the way America does things; this isn’t the way our Constitution’s intended to work,” Levin concluded. “The Democrat Party has hijacked the House of Representatives. It doesn’t speak for the full House, because the full House hasn’t spoken. The Democrat Party is pushing this impeachment. This is a Democrat Party impeachment, as I’ve been saying, a silent coup effort. This is why they dispense with all the traditions involving the last three presidents who went through this process.” Why is it so hard for you to read? The Republicans changed the rules. There no longer has to be a formal vote for the House to subpoena an individual. This is not complicated. If the Republicans hadn’t of changed the rules then the Dems would have been forced to hold a formal vote, but now they don’t. reo, MadMax, and pamo9 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 36 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Why is it so hard for you to read? The Republicans changed the rules. There no longer has to be a formal vote for the House to subpoena an individual. This is not complicated. If the Republicans hadn’t of changed the rules then the Dems would have been forced to hold a formal vote, but now they don’t. I always find it hilarious when one party changes the rules to benefit themselves, then it comes back to bite them in the ass. Dems got a taste of that with Reid and his nuclear option for judges. Starkiller, IsntLifeFunny, and MadMax 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 3 minutes ago, Omar said: I always find it hilarious when one party changes the rules to benefit themselves, then it comes back to bite them in the ass. Dems got a taste of that with Reid and his nuclear option for judges. The president blatantly manufacturing a national emergency to appropriate funds and initiate unilateral executive action will bite the repubs in the ass with an activist liberal president. The republican congress should have checked Trump on that one. Omar, and Starkiller 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 52 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Why is it so hard for you to read? The Republicans changed the rules. There no longer has to be a formal vote for the House to subpoena an individual. This is not complicated. If the Republicans hadn’t of changed the rules then the Dems would have been forced to hold a formal vote, but now they don’t. Doesn't matter what the official rules are. We are talking about the President of the United States. Democrats are wrong to play partisan politics and refuse to allow Republicans to issue subpoenas and call witnesses and cross-examine. That is why Trump should and is telling the Democrats to go pound sand on their requests. begooode, and reo 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 "Democrats are wrong to play partisan politics" LOL, this is all you guys understand. Fairness / reasonableness is a joke with this new GOP -- it's all about power. Elections have consequences, loser. Just wait until Trump takes you down the drain with him. LOL Starkiller, and MadMax 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Little Earl said: Doesn't matter what the official rules are. We are talking about the President of the United States. Democrats are wrong to play partisan politics and refuse to allow Republicans to issue subpoenas and call witnesses and cross-examine. That is why Trump should and is telling the Democrats to go pound sand on their requests. Republicans control the Senate and the DOJ. They can do their own investigation of Biden if they choose to embarrass themselves... As for Trump blocking witnesses, that just gives the Dems an easy argument for widening the impeachment inquiry. After all, adding more charges is a slam dunk now that he has handed them obstruction on a silver platter as well. Edited October 15, 2019 by Starkiller MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post IsntLifeFunny Posted October 15, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 39 minutes ago, Little Earl said: Doesn't matter what the official rules are. We are talking about the President of the United States. Democrats are wrong to play partisan politics and refuse to allow Republicans to issue subpoenas and call witnesses and cross-examine. That is why Trump should and is telling the Democrats to go pound sand on their requests. Who says they won’t? You do understand that the impeachment inquiry into Nixon started a whole year before he was formally impeached, yes? They have to gather facts and evidence before they hold a formal vote. Once that happens the Administration will be able to do all of the things you said above. As of now, the House has the right to Subpoena people without a formal vote, and they’re using that power, given to them by their colleagues the Republicans. So, essentially, quit ya bitching and deal with the fact you support an idiot overseeing a crooked administration m. ChemEngr79, Starkiller, Omar, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 7 minutes ago, Starkiller said: Republicans control the Senate and the DOJ. They can do their own investigation of Biden if they choose to embarrass themselves... As for Trump blocking witnesses, that just gives the Dems an easy argument for widening the impeachment inquiry. After all, adding more charges is a slam dunk now that he has handed them obstruction on a silver platter as well. yep, slam dunk to get rejected by the Senate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMax Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Little Earl said: yep, slam dunk to get rejected by the Senate. Which is a win you'll feel good about. Think about that for a moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Little Earl said: yep, slam dunk to get rejected by the Senate. I agree. But it’s still well worth impeaching Trump and airing his dirty laundry for the country to see. MadMax, Mythos27, and Omar 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post begooode Posted October 15, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Starkiller said: Republicans control the Senate and the DOJ. They can do their own investigation of Biden if they choose to embarrass themselves... The same Senate controlled intel committee that concluded indeed Russia interfered in an unprecedented fashion to assist Trump. The same conclusion on Russia that Trump and Giuliani were trying to discredit by cooking up misinformation that a besieged Ukraine was interfering to help Clinton,... And kick up dirt on Biden -- 2 fer the price of a few Javelin missiles,... But Ukraine shouldn't believe our president , because Putin will call him on a Sunday afternoon and the USA will withdraw their allied assistance overnight,... Edited October 15, 2019 by begooode Omar, Starkiller, MadMax, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted October 15, 2019 Report Share Posted October 15, 2019 11 minutes ago, begooode said: 2 fer the price of a few Javelin missiles,... LOL! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.