socaljake

A lot of really good college players don't pan out in the NFL. GM and teams worry about how you project to the NFL game. Physical attributes are a part of that. It's why Reese is going to go ahead of Bain even if Bain is the more productive college player. I'm sure Will Campbell was pretty good in college. He went top 5 last year. But his physical limitations are getting more exposed at the NFL level. You can get away with it in college when you're beating up on college DL.

Delane Commandeers gave up the 5th most passing yards last season. They cut Lattimore and have not done anything to replace him. They've addressed pass rush in FA with Oweh and Chaisson.

Could just depend on how the board falls. Last year it seemed like they were pretty locked in on DE which ended up being the case. I could see the first two picks being Love and one of Concepcion, Boston, or Bell. Another poster had an interesting thought about drafting an OT if there's someone they think could replace Moore in 2027. You could play the OT at G his rookie season similar to Lewan.

I think this is more like the JPP, Morgan, Graham draft. FWIW, all those guys were fairly productive, but I wouldn't call any of them elite. JPP maybe for certain stretches. If I thought any of these guys would turn into Nick Bosa, Aidan Hutchison, Micah Parsons I'd be all for taking one. But I don't see with this group. I think they'll be "good" but #4 pick level? Not so sure about that.

Yeah I never get that logic. You can literally name any position and there were guys found well after round 1. Tom Brady, Brock Purdy, Antonio Brown, Puka Nacua, Amon Ra St Brown, Travis Kelce, Danielle Hunter, Jonathan Greenard, Trey Hendrickson, Fred Warner, Richard Sherman, etc

Carnell Tate. Browns get an OSU guy to stay home.

Downs. At his opening PC, Harbaugh talked about the importance of the S position. I think he takes Downs as his Kyle Hamilton.

Cards trade the pick to the Rams or Cowboys. If it's the Rams, it will be Tate. If it's the Cowboys, it's for one of the DE. Cards trade down and take Ty Simpson. Been a lot of buzz about Simpson and the Cards recently. They could go the Dart route and try to trade up from round 2. I'll say they trade down instead from 3. I think you want to stay ahead of the Steelers at 20 and the Jets at 16. They could wait until round 2 and hope one of the OT like Lomu or Blake Miller falls, or they could also use the extra capital to trade back up from 2.

I just find it real hard to believe Robinson and a blocking TE is their only move. It's likely Love or Tate.

It's going to be one of the top 2 needs next to WR next season, so not a bad idea at all to jump ahead of it if they think there's a worthy guy. Didn't Lewan play G his rookie year. Can't remember if Roos did. You could draft an OT and play him at G the first year to fill that need.

Borgonzi was on the Schrager Hour. Borg got asked 40 min in about Love at 4.

No. It's called a figure of speech. They want a veteran C backing Ward. Not that he's literally behind Ward.

It's been widely reported that they want a vet C behind Ward, so I can't see it being a rookie C next to Volson. Personally I wouldn't want that either. That could be disastrous. Hopefully they resign Zeitler. Maybe another vet C gets cut at some point and they can add that player to the mix.

Mike Trout never won anything and he's one of the all time greats. I don't blame him for not winning. There's a lot of factors that go into it beyond the control of one player. QB might be the only exception that transcends that. Otherwise I think it's a bit silly. Calvin Johnson never won anything and I'd still love to have him.