Starkiller Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 http://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2017/story/_/id/19014328/nfl-teams-most-least-2017-draft-capital Even missing a 2nd round pick, getting the Rams' 1st obviously is the key. Cleveland is obviously far and away the top after trading down so much last year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 I'd love to get another 1st next year in a trade down. it just doesn't seem likely. I at least want to trade down and get a 2nd though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post headhunter Posted March 28, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 "We gave up too much for Conklin" says retards on TR. woolfolksunclesuncle, Starkiller, OILERMAN, and 11 others 14 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 Actually, this says the Titans acquired the 2nd most draft capital behind Cleveland (what they have now vs. their original picks before trades). SF and Chicago have more actual draft capital but it's largely original. The Titans have the 4th most draft capital. Ranking Every Team's 2017 NFL Draft Capital Tm Adj Orig Value Rank New Value Rank Diff Rank Browns 70.2 1 96.7 1 37.7% 1 Titans 44.3 18 58.7 4 32.5% 2 Saints 50.5 11 55.7 5 10.3% 3 Chiefs 39 27 40.7 18 4.3% 4 Steelers 37.3 30 37.6 22 0.8% 5 Washington 45.4 17 45.6 14 0.4% 6 Ravens 46.6 16 46.8 12 0.4% 7 Panthers 53.9 8 54.1 7 0.4% 8 Colts 47 15 47.1 11 0.2% 9 49ers 65.3 2 65 2 -0.5% 10 Seahawks 39.4 26 39.1 19 -0.8% 11 Bengals 52.7 9 52.1 8 -1.2% 12 Broncos 43.6 20 43 16 -1.4% 13 Bears 62 3 59.1 3 -4.7% 14 Texans 40.2 25 37.5 23 -6.7% 15 Eagles 50 12 46.6 13 -6.8% 16 Cardinals 48.7 13 44.8 15 -8.0% 17 Packers 37.8 29 34.5 27 -8.8% 18 Jets 56.2 6 50.8 9 -9.6% 19 Jaguars 60.3 4 54.5 6 -9.6% 20 Chargers 55.3 7 49.5 10 -10.5% 21 Lions 42.6 21 37.8 21 -11.3% 22 Buccaneers 44 19 38.7 20 -12.1% 23 Raiders 40.8 24 35.8 24 -12.3% 24 Giants 41.4 23 35.6 25 -14.0% 25 Falcons 36.8 31 31.5 30 -14.4% 26 Bills 51 10 42.8 17 -16.1% 27 Dolphins 41.9 22 34.8 26 -17.0% 28 Cowboys 38.4 28 31.7 29 -17.5% 29 Vikings 47.4 14 33.9 28 -28.5% 30 Patriots 36.1 32 21 32 -41.8% 31 Rams 58.1 5 31.5 31 -45.8% 32 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted March 28, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 3 minutes ago, BudAdams said: Actually, this says the Titans acquired the 2nd most draft capital behind Cleveland (what they have now vs. their original picks before trades). SF and Chicago have more actual draft capital but it's largely original. The Titans have the 4th most draft capital. Ranking Every Team's 2017 NFL Draft Capital Tm Adj Orig Value Rank New Value Rank Diff Rank Browns 70.2 1 96.7 1 37.7% 1 Titans 44.3 18 58.7 4 32.5% 2 Saints 50.5 11 55.7 5 10.3% 3 Chiefs 39 27 40.7 18 4.3% 4 Steelers 37.3 30 37.6 22 0.8% 5 Washington 45.4 17 45.6 14 0.4% 6 Ravens 46.6 16 46.8 12 0.4% 7 Panthers 53.9 8 54.1 7 0.4% 8 Colts 47 15 47.1 11 0.2% 9 49ers 65.3 2 65 2 -0.5% 10 Seahawks 39.4 26 39.1 19 -0.8% 11 Bengals 52.7 9 52.1 8 -1.2% 12 Broncos 43.6 20 43 16 -1.4% 13 Bears 62 3 59.1 3 -4.7% 14 Texans 40.2 25 37.5 23 -6.7% 15 Eagles 50 12 46.6 13 -6.8% 16 Cardinals 48.7 13 44.8 15 -8.0% 17 Packers 37.8 29 34.5 27 -8.8% 18 Jets 56.2 6 50.8 9 -9.6% 19 Jaguars 60.3 4 54.5 6 -9.6% 20 Chargers 55.3 7 49.5 10 -10.5% 21 Lions 42.6 21 37.8 21 -11.3% 22 Buccaneers 44 19 38.7 20 -12.1% 23 Raiders 40.8 24 35.8 24 -12.3% 24 Giants 41.4 23 35.6 25 -14.0% 25 Falcons 36.8 31 31.5 30 -14.4% 26 Bills 51 10 42.8 17 -16.1% 27 Dolphins 41.9 22 34.8 26 -17.0% 28 Cowboys 38.4 28 31.7 29 -17.5% 29 Vikings 47.4 14 33.9 28 -28.5% 30 Patriots 36.1 32 21 32 -41.8% 31 Rams 58.1 5 31.5 31 -45.8% 32 Good point, you are right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 The Titans are the only team with a winning record in 2016 with top 10 draft capital. Huston, Supdawg, Cornrow Wallace, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 1 hour ago, Starkiller said: http://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2017/story/_/id/19014328/nfl-teams-most-least-2017-draft-capital Even missing a 2nd round pick, getting the Rams' 1st obviously is the key. Cleveland is obviously far and away the top after trading down so much last year. Really??? I'm shocked. I was told on these boards that those picks are to be looked at in a vacuum. EagleEye 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 No question that Robinson has been successful in adding draft capital so far. Now it's more about making the picks count. I think the AV draft chart they use is interesting. Similar in concept to the Jimmy Johnson one but adjusted based on the players average value in their first 5 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleytolar Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 You would expect to come away with a haul if you are trading out of 1-1 and there are some QB hungry teams who value those players that high. Duh. Glad to have Conklin; never even said I would un-do the deal. I've still assert that we paid too much. It's "OKAY" if you disagree. In your arrogance, though, try to be graceful about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post headhunter Posted March 28, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 Just now, charleytolar said: You would expect to come away with a haul if you are trading out of 1-1 and there are some QB hungry teams who value those players that high. Duh. Glad to have Conklin; never even said I would un-do the deal. I've still assert that we paid too much. It's "OKAY" if you disagree. In your arrogance, though, try to be graceful about it. No Huston, Soxcat, wiscotitansfan, and 3 others 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 44 minutes ago, charleytolar said: You would expect to come away with a haul if you are trading out of 1-1 and there are some QB hungry teams who value those players that high. Duh. Glad to have Conklin; never even said I would un-do the deal. I've still assert that we paid too much. It's "OKAY" if you disagree. In your arrogance, though, try to be graceful about it. I think the forum has paid too much attention to this silly, pointless non-sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamlngEnvy Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, headhunter said: "We gave up too much for Conklin" says retards on TR. We did so if you got a million dollars and paid 100,000 for a cheeseburger you'd still be smart cuz you have 900,000? No also what makes anyone think Conklin ain't leaving for lt money as soon as he can if he still as highly regarded. Edited March 28, 2017 by 52O Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 Yeah, if building a team was like buying cheeseburgers,... EagleEye, and Mythos27 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleEye Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 Maybe they'll be more inclined to use some of capital after getting money from the Raiders move. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 31 minutes ago, 52O said: We did so if you got a million dollars and paid 100,000 for a cheeseburger you'd still be smart cuz you have 900,000? No also what makes anyone think Conklin ain't leaving for lt money as soon as he can if he still as highly regarded. Awful analogy. Half the problem is that most of us don't even agree that we overpaid. Paying a high price =/= overpaying. You guys can't seem to grasp that concept. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.