Jump to content

Total Trump Victory Celebration Thread


Mercalius

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, pat said:

I’m still trying to figure out why more workers would not yield more production.  That seems an odd assertion.  The assumption is that immigration “steals” jobs, but in practice what I see is immigrants do jobs that others aren’t willing to do.

 

I do see companies sending jobs offshore or near shore, but again that isn’t immigration.  Rather that’s capital performing wage arbitrage over borders.  Such arbitrage opportunities are created when capital has fewer barriers to movement while labor has high barriers to move.

 

If you wanna educate me then go ahead, but no I’m not gonna be convinced by merely “nope you’re wrong and not trying”.  Share more evidence.

No one ever said more workers don't yield more production. No one ever made the assumption that immigration "steals" jobs. Your inability to have a nuanced discussion and your insistence on putting words in my mouth to further your entrenched worldview are precisely the reasons I won't have this conversation or "try to convince you." The last thing I could ever do is convince you. I regret even dipping my toes in the toxicity of the politics forum. Good luck in your quest for education. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The United States is opposing calling Russia the aggressor in the war with Ukraine in a Group of 7 statement being drafted to mark the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion, four senior of

The funny thing about Levin is he was a Never Trumper and supported Cruz in the 2016 primaries. He said he'd never vote for Trump in a general election.  Just like we saw in all the Fox host text

Posted Images

5 hours ago, Titans279 said:

What do you mean by it "artificially" boosts the GDP? The GDP is going to actually increase if you add more people. What makes that artificial?

 

GDP per capita could increase or decrease depending on the productivity of the people added.

 

Which brings me to my last question... Couldn't the economic growth outpace the population growth in a ton of scenarios? I don't understand your reasoning here that it just doesn't fullstop.

 

 

What I mean is that it will increase general GDP while actually lowering GDP per capita. 

 

Yes, economic growth could outpace population growth in a ton of scenarios which is one of the reasons why immigration is generally a good thing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My next door neighbor's a white quadriplegic.  He had a job working for the government.  His mom told me that when he was born they told them to leave him at the hospital.  His parents were good christian people.  They didn't believe in murdering children, definitely not their own child.  They took him home.  He grew up and got a government job.   He's rolling out of there too.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Number9 said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgj288ywj23o

Trump puts all US government diversity staff on paid leave 'immediately'

 

Well @Mercalius, looks like you black guys and hispanics who voted for Trump got a big surprise.  LMAO!!

 


Diversity as a whole and DEI programs are different things.  Rage away though 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Titandan said:

 But yes, with more money comes greater temptation and  more opportunity to do evil things. 

 

You can start the evil before you get the money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Justafan said:

What I mean is that it will increase general GDP while actually lowering GDP per capita. 

 

Yes, economic growth could outpace population growth in a ton of scenarios which is one of the reasons why immigration is generally a good thing. 

Is there a factual basis for this assertion that immigration lowers GDP per capita?

 

Many immigrants come to the US as a young adult, work through their productive years, then go back home to retire.  In such cases the US isn't paying for their retirement or long term healthcare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And yes, I know one can go back to 2021 and 2022 to find yearly inflation of about 7%, which was wild.  From what I can tell, the Trump victory starts with going back to January 6, 2021 and resuming undeterred.  In a conversational sleight of hand, that isn't a good place for inflation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Jamalisms said:

 

 

Well if you can't find a single link that represents every opinion out there in a comprehensive way, then believe whatever you want, right? Using individual sources to begin educating the discussion, while acknowledging many other useful sources? Largely pointless. 

 

I'm willing to accept that you don't want to discuss. I'll move on.

We are at war with Eastasia. We've always been at war with Eastasia!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...